CERTAIN ISSUES ON INTERACTIONAND COORDINATION OF UKRAINIAN FORENSIC INSTITUTIONS WORK WITH OTHER ENTITIES WHILE IMPLEMENTING PREVENTIVEACTIVITY

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32353/khrife.1.2020_13

Keywords:

forensic examination,expert prevention, interaction, coordination, special knowledge, law enforcement agencies, forensic institutions.

Abstract

The article analyzes the conceptual principles, views and ideas on understanding the nature and forms of interaction of forensic institutions with law enforcement and judicial authorities in the implementation of preventive measures, considers its concept.

The correlation between the concepts of «interaction» and «coordination» has been studied, because one of the main problems that cannot be avoided in the forensic study of the phenomenon of expert prevention is the ambiguity of both scientific understanding and elaboration and practical application of the conceptual and categorical apparatus. In our opinion, the interaction of forensic institutions of Ukraine with other entities in the implementation of preventive activities should be understood based on laws and regulations, coordinated preventive activities of independent bodies to combine opportunities, methods and tools they have, to conduct an effective set of organizational, managerial, technical, scientific and other prevention measures. Interaction is carried out in two forms: procedural and non-procedural (organizational). The procedural form of interaction includes: conducting an examination to establish the circumstances that contributed to the commission of the offense (conducting an examination on preventive issues); establishing circumstances that are important for the prevention of offenses on the own initiative of the expert (use of the expert’s right to initiative); participation of an expert in investigative actions as a specialist; participation in the review of the scene and the reproduction of the situation and circumstances of the event; Advice from a specialist on the cessation of crimes can sometimes be provided by a specialist in the process of conducting operational and investigative measures (for example, recommendations for photographing non-commodity documents operatively), etc.

The next type of interaction and coordination of forensic institutions of Ukraine with other entities in the implementation of preventive activities are non-procedural (organizational) measures. In contrast to the procedural form of interaction, the emergence and development of organizational forms is not associated with the requirements of procedural law, but with the participants’ awareness of the need for cooperation based on mutual assistance and assistance to each other to more effectively achieve common goals.

The implementation of joint, coordinated preventive activities involves several mutually agreed stages, namely: interaction at the preparatory (information-analytical), main and final stages. It should be emphasized that in the professional literature the number and nature of these stages may differ. 

References

Aliyev, I. A. (1986) Problemy borby s prestupnostyu na osnove primeneniya spetsialnykh poznaniy v epokhu uskoreniya nauchno-tekhnicheskogo progressa: mat. Vse-soyuznoy nauch.-praktich. konf. «Pravovyye, organizatsionnyye i metodicheskiye problemy profilakticheskoy deyatelnosti uchrezhdeniy sudebnoy ekspertizy», (Baku, 9-10 oktyabrya 1986 g.). Baku [in Russian].
Atakhodzhayev, S. A. (1979) Nekotoryye voprosy ekspertnoy profilaktiki i yeye organi-zatsiya. Problemy sudebnoy ekspertizy. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov. Tashkent. [in Russian].
Averyanova, T. V. (2007) Sudebnaya ekspertiza. Moscow: Norma [in Russian].
Azarov, YU. I. & Rafalskiy, E. O. (2014) Osoblivosti vzaemodii slidchogo z yekspertom (spetsialistom) na pochatkovomu yetapi dosudovogo rozsliduvannya. URL: http:// irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/cgi-bin/irbis_nbuv.pdfirbis-nbuv.gov.ua-cgi-bin-irbis_nbuv-cgiirbis_64-jnn_2014_10_11. [in Ukrainian].
Bandurka, A. M. & Bocharova, S. P. & Zemlyanskaya, Ye. V. (2007) Psikhologiya upra-vleniya: uchebnoye posobiye. Kharkiv. Titul [in Russian].
Bandurka, A. M. & Davydenko, L. M. (2003) Prestupnost v Ukraine: prichiny i protivod-eystviye: monografiya. Kharkiv: Gos. spets. izd-vo «Osnova» [in Ukrainian].
Bandurka, O. M. & Litvinov, O. M. (2016) Pro kriminologichniy stsenariy svitu infor-matsiynoi yepokhi. Aktualni problemi kriminalnogo prava ta kriminologii u svit-li reformuvannya kriminalnoi yustitsii: zb. tez dop. Mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konf. (m. Kharkiv, 19 trav. 2016 r.). MVS Ukraini, Kharkiv. nats. un-t vnutr. sprav; Kriminol. asots. Ukraini; Un-t Angliya Raskin; Praz. in-t doslidzh. z pitan bezpeki (PSSI); Ches. kriminol. t-vo; Kharkiv. misk. oseredok grom. org. «Vseukr. asots. krimin. prava». Kharkiv: Kharkiv. nats un-t vnutr. sprav [in Ukrainian].
Bandurka, O. M. & Zatserklyaniy, M. M. & Vepritskiy, R. S. (2013) Zlochinnist v Ukraini: yekonomiko-kriminologichniy analiz: monografiya. D-r yurid. nauk, prof. O. M. Litvinov (Ed.). Kharkiv: Zolota milya. [in Ukrainian].
Bandurka, O. M. (2000) Upravlinnya v organakh vnutrishnikh sprav Ukraіni: Pidruchnik. Kharkiv: Un-t vnutr. sprav, 1998 [in Ukrainian].
Bandurka, O. M. (2002) Operativno-rozshukova diyalnist. Chastina I: Pidruchnik. Kharkiv: NUVS. [in Ukrainian].
Belkin, R. S. (2000) Kriminalisticheskaya entsiklopediya. Moscow: Delo [in Russian]. Bondar, G. YU. (2003) Problemi viznachennya sutnosti ta znachennya vzaemodii v di-yalnosti slidchikh pravookhoronnikh vidomstv. Visnik Natsionalnogo universitetu
vnutrishnikh sprav. Vip. 22 [in Ukrainian].
Fedkovych, O.V. (2007) Rol orhaniv yustytsiyi v orhanizatsiyi ta zabezpechenni funkt-sionuvannya systemy pravosuddya. (Dys. kand. yuryd. nauk. 12.00.10). NAN Ukrayiny; Instytut derzhavy i prava im. V.M. Koretskoho. Kyiv [in Ukrainian]. Filipenko, N. YE., Shendryk V. V., S. V. Markov. (2010). Pravovi ta orhanizatsiyno-tak-tychni osnovy profilaktyky penitentsiarnoyi zlochynnosti: navch. posibnyk.
Kharkiv: UVPD HSH MVS Ukrayiny. [in Ukrainian].
Filipenko, N. YE. (2009) Spivvidnoshennya ponyat «vzayemodiya» i «koordynatsiya» v teoriyi operatyvno-rozshukovoyi diyalnosti. Visnyk Luhanskoho derzhavnoho universytetu vnutrishnikh sprav. LDUVS. № 2. Ch. 2 [in Ukrainian].
Filosofskyy entsyklopedychnyy slovnyk. (2002). Dovidkove vydannya. Natsionalna akademiya nauk Ukrayiny. Instytut filosofiyi im. H. S. Skovorody. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Frydman, Y. YA. (1972) Yspolzovanye dannykh sudebnoy ekspertyzy dlya preduprezhde-nyya pravonarushenyy. Kyiv: RYO MVD USSR [in Russian].
Frydman, Y. YA. (1974) Sudebnaya ekspertyza y voprosy preduprezhdenyya prestuplenyy. (Extended abstract of dys. d-ra yuryd. nauk: 12.00.09). Moscow [in Russian].
Gurina, D. P. (2009) Yekspertna profilaktika: formi realizatsii ta sposobi fiksatsii. Visnik Akademii advokaturi Ukraini. 1(14) [in Ukrainian].
Khan, H. A. (2006) Profilaktyka zlochyniv (kryminalistychnyy aspekt). DNDEKTS MVS Ukrayiny; KNUVS. Kryminalistychnyy visnyk: naukovo-praktychnyy zbirnyk. Kyiv. № 2(6). [in Ukrainian].
Kliuiev, O. M. (2005) Vzayemodiya pidrozdiliv orhaniv vnutrishnikh sprav na rehional-nomu rivni: monohrafiya. Kharkiv: Osnova. [in Ukrainian].
Kliuiev, O. M. (2011) Ponyattya ta sutnist kontrolyu, shcho zdiysnyuyetsya pravookhoron-nymy orhanamy. URL: http://www.nbuv.gov.ua /portal/soc_gum /Yurnip/2011_1/ Klyuev.pdf.[in Ukrainian].
Kliuiev, O. M. (2011) Problemy rozmezhuvannya ponyat «koordynatsiya» i «vzayemodi-ya» v upravlinskiy nautsi ta praktychniy diyalnosti orhaniv vnutrishnikh sprav. URL: http://www.nbuv.gov.ua/portal/2011_3.pdf. [in Ukrainian].
Kliuiev, O. M. (2018) Mizhnarodni standarty ta mizhnarodne spivrobitnytstvo u sferi sudovo-ekspertnoyi diyalnosti v Ukrayini. Aktualni pytannya sudovoyi eksper-tyzy ta kryminalistyky: materialy mizhnarod. nauk.-prakt. konf., prysvyachenoyi 95-richchyu stvorennya Kharkivskoho naukovo-doslidnoho instytutu sudovykh ekspertyz im. Zasl. prof. M. S. Bokariusa (m. Kharkiv, 10–11 zhovtnya 2018 r.). Kharkiv: Pravo [in Ukrainian].
Kononenko, Y. P. (1978) Ob osnovnykh napravlenyyakh y orhanyzatsyy profylak-tycheskoy raboty v sudebno-еkspertnom uchrezhdenyy. Puty sovershenstvo-vanyya metodyky y orhanyzatsyy profylaktycheskoy deyatelnosty ekspertnykh uchrezhdenyy: mat-ly Vsesoyuz. nauch.-prakt. semynara (h. Kyiv, 27-29 aprelya 1976 h.). Kyiv [in Russian]
Kulyk, V. P. (1978) Metodolohyya prava. Moscow: Prohress [in Russian].
Lytvynov, A. N. & Havrysh, T. S. (2003) Profylaktyka prestuplenyy. Ot teoryy k praktyke: nauch.-prakt. posobye. Moscow: EKMOS [in Russian].
Melnyk P. V., Dankovych N. O., Fridman I. YA. (2011). Profilaktyka pravoporushen (kry-minolohichni ta ekspertno-kryminalistychni aspekty): monohrafiya. Irpin: Natsio-nalnyy universytet DPS Ukrayiny. [in Ukrainian].
Moyisyeyev, O. M. (2010) Ekspertna profilaktyka v umovakh protydiyi rozsliduvannyu. Borotba z orhanizovanoyu zlochynnistyu i koruptsiyeyu (teoriya i praktyka). № 23 [in Ukrainian].
Nehodchenko, V. O. (2003) Diyalnist orhaniv vnutrishnikh sprav shchodo poperedzhenn-ya zlochyniv u suchasnykh umovakh.(Dys. kand. yuryd. nauk. 12.00.08). Kharkiv: NUVS [in Ukrainian].
Obrusna, S. YU. (2010) Teoretyko-metodolohichni zasady sudovoho upravlinnya: shcho-do postanovky problemy. Forum prava. № 2 [in Ukrainian].
Osoblyvosti rozkryttya zlochyniv, povyazanykh iz zastosuvannyam vybukhivky: nauk.-prakt. (2002). Posibnyk. Chl.-kor. akademiyi ped. nauk YA.YU. Kondratyeva (Ed.). Kyiv: Natsionalna akademiya vnutrishnikh sprav Ukrayiny. [in Ukrainian].
Plishkin, V. M. (1999)Teoriya upravlinnya orhanamy vnutrishnikh sprav.Kharkiv: NAVSU. [in Ukrainian].
Polyshchuk, A. D. (1982) Ponyatye vzaymodeystvyya mylytsyy y dobrovolnykh narodnykh druzhyn v okhrane obshchestvennoho poryadka. Vzaymodeystvye orhanov vnu-trennykh del s obshchestvennostyu po obespechenyyu okhrany obshchestvenno-ho poryadka. Kharkiv: NyyRYO KVSH MVD SSSR. [in Russian].
Poperedzhennya i rozkryttya zlochyniv pidrozdilamy karnoho rozshuku: pidruchnyk. (2000). Kyiv: RVV MVS Ukrayiny. [in Ukrainian].
Preduprezhdenye prestuplenyy y sudebnaya ekspertyza. (1968). Moscow: Yuryd. lyt. [in Russian].
Pro zatverdzhennya Instruktsiyi z orhanizatsiyi vzayemodiyi orhaniv dosudovoho rozsl-iduvannya z inshymy orhanamy ta pidrozdilamy Natsionalnoyi politsiyi Ukrayiny v zapobihanni kryminalnym pravoporushennyam, yikh vyyavlenni ta rozsliduvan-ni. Nakaz MVS Ukrayiny vid 07.07.2017 № 575 https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/ show/z0937-17#Text [in Ukrainian].
Profylaktycheskaya deyatelnost ekspertnykh uchrezhdenyy systemy Mynysterstva yustyt-syy SSSR (metodycheskoe posobye dlya sudey, sledovateley y sudebnykh eksper-tov). Moscow, 1980. 186 s. [in Russian].
Rekomendatsiya (2000) 19 Komitetu Ministriv Rady Yevropy derzhavam-chlenam shcho-do roli prokuratury v systemi kryminalnoho pravosuddya, ukhvalena Komitetom Ministriv Rady Yevropy na 724 zasidanni zastupnykiv ministriv 6 zhovtnya 2000 roku. (2010). Mizhnarodni standarty u sferi sudochynstva. Kyiv: Istyna. [in Russian].
Shamray, V. (2004) Ponyattya i sut vzayemodiyi, yiyi znachennya. Prokuratura, lyudyna, derzhava. № 1 (31) [in Ukrainian].
Shcherbakovskyy, M. H. (2016) Teoretyko-metodolohichni ta prakseolohichni zasady sudovykh ekspertyz u kryminalnomu protsesi. (Extended abstract of candidates thesis: 12.00.09). Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
Shepitko, V. YU. (2001) Kryminalistyka: entsyklopedychnyy slovnyk (ukrayinsko-rosiys-kyy i rosiysko-ukrayinskyy).Akad. HAH Ukrayiny V. YA. Tatsiya (Ed.). Kharkiv: NYUA [in Ukrainian].
Shepitko, V. YU. (2013) O novellakh v yspolzovanyy spetsyalnykh znanyy v uholov-nom protsesse Ukrayny. Teoryya y praktyka sudebnoy ekspertyzy v sovremennykh uslovyyakh: materyaly 4-y Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. 30–31 yanv. 2013 h. Moscow: Prospekt [in Russian].
Simakova-Yefremian, E. B. (2017) Do pytannya pro vzayemozalezhnist yevropeyskykh intehratsiynykh protsesiv i tendentsiy intehratsiyi spetsialnykh znan v Ukrayini. Teoriya ta praktyka sudovoyi ekspertyzy i kryminalistyky.Vyp. 17. Kharkiv: Pravo [in Ukrainian].
Snigerov, O. P., Dusheyko, H. O., Dolhyy, O. A. ta in. (2003). Operatyvno-rozshukova in-formatsiya: problemy realizatsiyi: monohrafiya. A. M. Podolyaky i P. V. Kolyady (Eds.). Sumy: VVP «Mriya-1». [in Ukrainian].
Sushko, YU. S. (1994) Aktualni problemy profilaktychnoyi diyalnosti pry provedenni su-dovo-ekonomichnykh ekspertyz. (Extended abstract of candidates thesis). Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Velikiy tlumachniy slovnik suchasnoi ukrainskoi movi (s dod. i dopovn.). (2005). Uklad. i golov. red. V.T. Busel. Kharkiv; Irpin: VTF «Perun» [in Ukrainian].
Vilgushinskiy, M. Y. (2012) Osoblivosti vzaemodii sudiv iz pravookhoronnimi organami. Naukovi zapiski Institutu zakonodavstva Verkhovnoi Radi Ukraini. Vip. № 4 (13). URL: http://archive.nbuv.gov.ua/Portal/Soc_gum/nzizvru/ 2012_4/p13_13.html. [in Ukrainian].

Published

2020-07-21

How to Cite

Snigerov, O., & Filipenko, N. (2020). CERTAIN ISSUES ON INTERACTIONAND COORDINATION OF UKRAINIAN FORENSIC INSTITUTIONS WORK WITH OTHER ENTITIES WHILE IMPLEMENTING PREVENTIVEACTIVITY. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science and Criminalistics, 21(1), 194–217. https://doi.org/10.32353/khrife.1.2020_13

Issue

Section

GENERAL REGULATIONS OF FORENSIC EXAMINATION