Research, verification and evaluation of forensic expert conclusion: forensic veterinary aspect
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32353/khrife.1.2024.07Keywords:
forensic veterinary medicine; forensic expert conclusion; research, verification, forensic expert conclusion evaluation; objectivity; comprehensiveness; reliability; validity; research completeness; source of evidence.Abstract
The author aimed to outline the grounds and criteria, to single out methods and characterize procedural of research specifics, verification and evaluation of forensic veterinary expert conclusion . In order to achieve this goal, a set of interrelated research methods (dialectical, systemic-structural, systemic-functional, comparative-legal, formal logic (analysis, synthesis, deduction, induction, analogy), modeling, statistical) was applied. The grounds, criteria, methods and procedural specifics of the research, verification and assessment of forensic expert conclusion are considered. Attention is focused on forensic and veterinary aspect of this issue. It is claimed that during verification of forensic expert conclusion, it is necessary to assess its comprehensiveness, completeness and objectivity, as well as scientific validity, reliability, correctness, admissibility of using methods and techniques, means and methods of conducting expert research, as well as adequacy and relationship with other evidence collected within the framework of a criminal proceeding (case) with the aim of making a correct procedural decision (for evidence of factual data and circumstances proven by expert research). The criteria for completeness and reasonableness of the expert’s conclusion are proposed, as well as the algorithm for evaluating such a conclusion by the investigator, prosecutor, defense attorney, investigative judge, and court. The application of a set of these criteria to the assessment of a forensic expert’s opinion will guarantee the reliability of the verification and assessment of such conclusion, as well as create reliable conditions for making procedural decisions in legal proceedings.
References
Amelina, A. S., Bilousov, B. L. (2018). Otsinka vysnovku eksperta ta yoho dokazove znachennia [Evaluation of fornsic expert conclusion and its evidentiary value]. Mizhnarodnyi yurydychnyi visnyk: aktualni problemy suchasnosti (teoriia ta praktyka). Vyp. 1—2 (10—11). URL: http://nbuv. gov.ua/UJRN/muvnudp_2018_1-2_33 [in Ukrainian].
Barbash, D. (2023). Otsinka vysnovku eksperta sudom u kryminalnomu provadzhenni: teoretychni ta prykladni aspekty u svitli sudovoi praktyky [Evaluation of forensic expert conclusion by court in criminal proceedings: theoretical and applied aspects in the light of judicial practice]. Aktualni pytannia sudovoi ekspertyzy i kry-minalistyky : zb. mat-liv mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konf. z nahody 100-rich. NNTs «ISE im. Zasl. prof. M. S. Bokariusa» (Kharkiv, 10.11.2023). Kharkiv. URL: https://drive. google.com/file/d/1Kwin74kcc8IVhymxGL XWOEAccvxnpzA6/view [in Ukrainian].
Baulin, O. V., Izotov, O. I. (2021). Perevirka i оtsinka vysnovku eksperta u kryminalnomu provadzhenni [Verification and evaluation of forensic expert conclusion in criminal proceedings]. Kryminalistyka i sudova ekspertyza. Vyp. 66. DOI: 10.33994/ kndise.2021.66.11 [in Ukrainian].
Bazhaniuk, V. V. (2021). Otsinka vysnovku eksperta u kryminalnomu provadzhenni [Evaluation of forensic expert conclusion in criminal proceedings]. Naukovyi visnyk Mizhnarodnoho humanitarnoho universytetu. Seriia: Yurysprudentsiia. № 54. T. 2. DOI: 10.32841/2307-1745.2021.54.2.24 [in Ukrainian].
Biedermann, A., Kotsoglou, K. N. (2018). Decisional Dimensions in Expert Witness Testimony — A Structural Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology. Vol. 31. Is. 9. Art. 2073. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02073.
Chornous, Yu., Leliuk, T. (2023). Aktualni pytannia orhanizatsii provedennia su-dovykh ekspertyz u kryminalnomu provadzhenni [Topical issues of the organization of forensic examinations in criminal proceedings]. Aktualni pytannia sudovoi ekspertyzy i kryminalistyky : zb. mat-liv mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konf. z nahody 100-rich. NNTs «ISE im. Zasl. prof. M. S. Bokariusa» (Kharkiv, 10.11.2023). Kharkiv. URL: https://drive.google.com/ file/d/1Kwin74kcc8IVhymxGLXWOEAccvx npzA6/view [in Ukrainian].
Dementiev, M. (2021). Umovy ta kryterii dostovirnosti vysnovku eksperta [Conditions and criteria for the reliability of forensic expert conclusion]. Knowledge, Education, Law, Management. № 6 (42). DOI: 10.51647/kelm.2021.6.25 [in Ukrainian].
Fedyk, Yu. Ya., Besaha, I. V. (2023). Dokazove znachennia vysnovku fakhivtsia u haluzi veterynarnoi medytsyny u sudovomu protsesi [Evidence value of the conclusion of a specialist in the field of veterinary medicine in the trial]. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Seriia: Pravo. Vyp. 77. Ch. 2. DOI: 10.24144/2307-3322.2023.77.2.44 [in Ukrainian].
Korzh, V. P. (2022). Otsinka vysnovku eksperta: protsesualni pidstavy, kryminalistychni rekomendatsii [Evaluation of forensic expert conclusion: procedural grounds, forensic recommendations]. Suchasni tendentsii rozvytku kryminalistyky ta kryminalnoho protsesu v umovakh voiennoho stanu : tezy dop. Mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konf. (25.11.2022, Kharkiv). Kharkiv. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7339681 [in Ukrainian].
Kozhushko, O. V. (2020). Metodychnyi pidkhid do otsinky vysnovku sudovoho eksperta po rezultatam provedennia sudovo-ekonomichnoi ekspertyzy [Methodical approach to evaluating forensic expert conclusion based on the results of a forensic economic examination]. Efektyvna ekonomika. № 6. DOI: 10.32702/2307-2105-2020.6.53 [in Ukrainian].
Kutskir, H. M. (2020). Protsesualni osoblyvosti dopytu eksperta v sudi [Procedural spesifics of interrogation of an expert in court]. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Seriia: Pravo. Vyp. 60. DOI: 10.32782/2307-3322/2020.60.37 [in Ukrainian].
Lukianchuk, O. I. (2021). Pravomirnist retsenzuvannia vysnovku eksperta v sudovomu protsesi [Legality of reviewing forensic expert conclusion in court]. Kryminalistychnyi visnyk. № 1 (35). DOI: 10.37025/1992-4437/2021-35-1-38 [in Ukrainian].
Myroshnychenko, Yu. M. (2009). Doslidzhennia, perevirka ta otsinka sudom vysnovku eksperta [Examination, verification and evaluation by the court of forensic expert conclusion]. Forum prava. № 3. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/FP_index. htm_2009_3_67 [in Ukrainian].
Puchko, D. V. (2020). Relevance and reliability of an expert conclusion as a criteria for evaluating forensic examination. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science and Criminalistics. Is. 22. DOI: 10.32353/ khrife.2.2020.17.
Satiani, Bh. (2006). Expert witness testimony: rules of engagement. Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. Vol. 40. Is. 3. DOI: 10.1177/153857440604000307.
Shabarovskyi, B. V. (2019). Sposoby perevirky vysnovku eksperta u kryminalnomu protsesi Ukrainy [Means of verifying forensic expert conclusion in legal proceedings of Ukraine]. Pravo i bezpeka. № 2 (73). DOI: 10.32631/ pb.2019.2.13 [in Ukrainian].
Shcherbakovskyi, M. H. (2015). Provedennia ta vykorystannia sudovykh ekspertyz u kry-minalnomu provadzhenni [Conducting and using forensic examinations in criminal proceedings] : monohrafiia. Kharkiv. URL: https://dspace.univd.edu.ua/xmlui/ handle/123456789/6020 [in Ukrainian].
Shcherbakovskyi, M. (2021). The standard of forensic report veracity in criminal proceedings. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science and Criminalistics. Is. 3 (25). DOI: 10.32353/khrife.3.2021.03.
Shcherbakovskyi, M. H., Dementiev, M. V., Protsenko, A. M. (2022). Kryterii ta vydy protsesualnykh porushen yak pidstavy nedopustymosti vysnovku eksperta [Criteria and types of procedural violations as grounds for the inadmissibility of an expert’s conclusion]. Visnyk Luhanskoho derzhavnoho universytetu vnutrishnikh sprav im. E. O. Didorenka. Vyp. 3 (99). DOI: 10.33766/2524-0323.99.173-186 [in Ukrainian].
Viter, D. (2020). Otsiniuvannia dopustymosti ta dostovirnosti vysnovku eksperta slidchym pid chas rozsliduvannia zlochyniv u sferi finansuvannia sotsialnykh tsilovykh prohram [Evaluation of admissibility and reliability of forensic expert conclusion by investigator during crime investigation]. Naukovyi visnyk Dnipropetrovskoho derzhavnoho universytetu vnutrishnikh sprav. № 3. DOI: 10.31733/2078-3566-2020-3-256-264 [in Ukrainian].
Vorobchak, A. R. (2019). Vysnovok eksperta yak dzherelo dokaziv u kryminalnomu provadzhenni [Forensic expert conclusion as a source of evidence in criminal proceedings] : dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk. Odesa. URL: https://dspace.onua.edu. ua/server/api/core/bitstreams/d2dfd0ad-7eb3-460f-965f-698f2d97b889/content [in Ukrainian].
Yatsenko, I. V. (2021). Metodyka sudovo-veterynarnoho doslidzhennia tvaryn z metoiu vstanovlennia yikh kalitstva [Methods of forensic veterinary examination of animals in order to establish their mutilation]. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
Yatsenko, I. (2022). Legal Status of Forensic Veterinarian as a Subject of Forensic Science Activity in Context of the Latest Legislation of Ukraine. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science and Criminalistics. Is. 4 (29). DOI: 10.32353/khrife.4.2022.04.
Yatsenko, I. V. (2022). Predmet sudovo-veterynarnoi ekspertyzy ta yoho znachennia v teorii i praktytsi sudovoi ekspertyzy [Topic of forensic veterinary examination and its importance in the theory and practice of forensic science]. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Seriia: Pravo. Vyp. 73. Ch. 2. DOI: 10.24144/2307-3322.2022.73.55 [in Ukrainian].
Yatsenko, I. V. (2022). Sudova veterynarna medytsyna yak navchalna komponenta dlia profesiinoho formuvannia likariv veterynarnoi medytsyny ta yii znachennia u systemi pidhotovky sudovo-veterynarnykh ekspertiv u derzhavnykh ekspertnykh ustanovakh Ukrainy [Forensic veterinary medicine as an educational component for the professional formation of veterinary medicine doctors and its importance in the training system of forensic veterinary experts in the state expert institutions of Ukraine]. Current trends in the development of modern scientific thought : Proceedings of the I International Scientific and Practical Conference (Khaifa, Izrail, 27—30.09.2022). Haifa, Israel. DOI: 10.46299/ISG.2022.2.1 [in Ukrainian].
Yatsenko, I. (2023). Epistemological Characteristic and Procedural Significance of Steps and Stages of Appointing and Conducting Forensic Veterinary Examination. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science and Criminalistics. Is. 1 (30). DOI: 10.32353/khrife.1.2023.05.
Yatsenko, I. (2023). Legal Status and Epistemological Characteristics of Forensic Veterinary Science Objects. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science and Criminalistics. Is. 2 (31). DOI: 10.32353/ khrife.2.2023.05.
Yatsenko, I. V. (2023). Zavdannia sudovo-veterynarnoi ekspertyzy: teoretychni y prakseolohichni problemy ta shliakhy yikh vyrishennia [Tasks of forensic veterinary examination: theoretical and praxeological issues and ways for their solving]. Forum prava. Vyp. 74. № 1. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7319900 [in Ukrainian].
Yatsenko, I. V., Derecha, L. M., Parylovskyi, O. І. (2020). Peculiarities of the forensic veterinarian conclusion structure based on the results of research on animal corpse bearing signs of violent death. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science and Criminalistics. Is. 21. DOI: 10.32353/khrife.1.2020.44.
Yatsenko, I. V., Kazantsev, R. H. (2022). Metodyka sudovo-veterynarnoi ekspertyzy trupiv tvaryn [Methods of forensic veterinary examination of animal corpses]. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
Yatsenko, I. V., Parylovskyi, O. I. (2022). Pravyla sudovo-veterynarnoho vyznachennia stupenia tiazhkosti shkody, zapodiianoi zdoroviu tvaryny (metodychni rekomendatsii) [Rules of Forensic Veterinary Determination of the Severity of Damage Caused to the Animal’s Health (Guidelines)]. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
Yunatskyi, O. (2023). Ustanovlennia dosto-virnosti vysnovku eksperta pid chas yoho otsinky [Establishing reliability of forensic expert’s conclusion during its assessment]. Aktualni pytannia sudovoi ekspertyzy i kryminalistyky : zb. mat-liv mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konf. z nahody 100-rich. NNTs «ISE im. Zasl. prof. M. S. Bokariusa» (Kharkiv, 10.11.2023). Kharkiv. URL: https://drive. google.com/file/d/1Kwin74kcc8IVhymxGL XWOEAccvxnpzA6/view [in Ukrainian].
Zhmudinskyi, V. P. (2022). Mekhanizm oskarzhennia ta sposoby perevirky vysnovku eksperta v kryminalnomu provadzhenni [Appeal mechanism and ways of verifying forensic expert’s conclusion in criminal proceedings]. Copernicus Political and Legal Studies. Vol. 1. Is. 3. DOI: 10.15804/CPLS.20223.06 [in Ukrainian].
Barbash, D. (2023). Otsinka vysnovku eksperta sudom u kryminalnomu provadzhenni: teoretychni ta prykladni aspekty u svitli sudovoi praktyky [Evaluation of forensic expert conclusion by court in criminal proceedings: theoretical and applied aspects in the light of judicial practice]. Aktualni pytannia sudovoi ekspertyzy i kry-minalistyky : zb. mat-liv mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konf. z nahody 100-rich. NNTs «ISE im. Zasl. prof. M. S. Bokariusa» (Kharkiv, 10.11.2023). Kharkiv. URL: https://drive. google.com/file/d/1Kwin74kcc8IVhymxGL XWOEAccvxnpzA6/view [in Ukrainian].
Baulin, O. V., Izotov, O. I. (2021). Perevirka i оtsinka vysnovku eksperta u kryminalnomu provadzhenni [Verification and evaluation of forensic expert conclusion in criminal proceedings]. Kryminalistyka i sudova ekspertyza. Vyp. 66. DOI: 10.33994/ kndise.2021.66.11 [in Ukrainian].
Bazhaniuk, V. V. (2021). Otsinka vysnovku eksperta u kryminalnomu provadzhenni [Evaluation of forensic expert conclusion in criminal proceedings]. Naukovyi visnyk Mizhnarodnoho humanitarnoho universytetu. Seriia: Yurysprudentsiia. № 54. T. 2. DOI: 10.32841/2307-1745.2021.54.2.24 [in Ukrainian].
Biedermann, A., Kotsoglou, K. N. (2018). Decisional Dimensions in Expert Witness Testimony — A Structural Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology. Vol. 31. Is. 9. Art. 2073. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02073.
Chornous, Yu., Leliuk, T. (2023). Aktualni pytannia orhanizatsii provedennia su-dovykh ekspertyz u kryminalnomu provadzhenni [Topical issues of the organization of forensic examinations in criminal proceedings]. Aktualni pytannia sudovoi ekspertyzy i kryminalistyky : zb. mat-liv mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konf. z nahody 100-rich. NNTs «ISE im. Zasl. prof. M. S. Bokariusa» (Kharkiv, 10.11.2023). Kharkiv. URL: https://drive.google.com/ file/d/1Kwin74kcc8IVhymxGLXWOEAccvx npzA6/view [in Ukrainian].
Dementiev, M. (2021). Umovy ta kryterii dostovirnosti vysnovku eksperta [Conditions and criteria for the reliability of forensic expert conclusion]. Knowledge, Education, Law, Management. № 6 (42). DOI: 10.51647/kelm.2021.6.25 [in Ukrainian].
Fedyk, Yu. Ya., Besaha, I. V. (2023). Dokazove znachennia vysnovku fakhivtsia u haluzi veterynarnoi medytsyny u sudovomu protsesi [Evidence value of the conclusion of a specialist in the field of veterinary medicine in the trial]. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Seriia: Pravo. Vyp. 77. Ch. 2. DOI: 10.24144/2307-3322.2023.77.2.44 [in Ukrainian].
Korzh, V. P. (2022). Otsinka vysnovku eksperta: protsesualni pidstavy, kryminalistychni rekomendatsii [Evaluation of forensic expert conclusion: procedural grounds, forensic recommendations]. Suchasni tendentsii rozvytku kryminalistyky ta kryminalnoho protsesu v umovakh voiennoho stanu : tezy dop. Mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konf. (25.11.2022, Kharkiv). Kharkiv. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7339681 [in Ukrainian].
Kozhushko, O. V. (2020). Metodychnyi pidkhid do otsinky vysnovku sudovoho eksperta po rezultatam provedennia sudovo-ekonomichnoi ekspertyzy [Methodical approach to evaluating forensic expert conclusion based on the results of a forensic economic examination]. Efektyvna ekonomika. № 6. DOI: 10.32702/2307-2105-2020.6.53 [in Ukrainian].
Kutskir, H. M. (2020). Protsesualni osoblyvosti dopytu eksperta v sudi [Procedural spesifics of interrogation of an expert in court]. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Seriia: Pravo. Vyp. 60. DOI: 10.32782/2307-3322/2020.60.37 [in Ukrainian].
Lukianchuk, O. I. (2021). Pravomirnist retsenzuvannia vysnovku eksperta v sudovomu protsesi [Legality of reviewing forensic expert conclusion in court]. Kryminalistychnyi visnyk. № 1 (35). DOI: 10.37025/1992-4437/2021-35-1-38 [in Ukrainian].
Myroshnychenko, Yu. M. (2009). Doslidzhennia, perevirka ta otsinka sudom vysnovku eksperta [Examination, verification and evaluation by the court of forensic expert conclusion]. Forum prava. № 3. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/FP_index. htm_2009_3_67 [in Ukrainian].
Puchko, D. V. (2020). Relevance and reliability of an expert conclusion as a criteria for evaluating forensic examination. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science and Criminalistics. Is. 22. DOI: 10.32353/ khrife.2.2020.17.
Satiani, Bh. (2006). Expert witness testimony: rules of engagement. Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. Vol. 40. Is. 3. DOI: 10.1177/153857440604000307.
Shabarovskyi, B. V. (2019). Sposoby perevirky vysnovku eksperta u kryminalnomu protsesi Ukrainy [Means of verifying forensic expert conclusion in legal proceedings of Ukraine]. Pravo i bezpeka. № 2 (73). DOI: 10.32631/ pb.2019.2.13 [in Ukrainian].
Shcherbakovskyi, M. H. (2015). Provedennia ta vykorystannia sudovykh ekspertyz u kry-minalnomu provadzhenni [Conducting and using forensic examinations in criminal proceedings] : monohrafiia. Kharkiv. URL: https://dspace.univd.edu.ua/xmlui/ handle/123456789/6020 [in Ukrainian].
Shcherbakovskyi, M. (2021). The standard of forensic report veracity in criminal proceedings. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science and Criminalistics. Is. 3 (25). DOI: 10.32353/khrife.3.2021.03.
Shcherbakovskyi, M. H., Dementiev, M. V., Protsenko, A. M. (2022). Kryterii ta vydy protsesualnykh porushen yak pidstavy nedopustymosti vysnovku eksperta [Criteria and types of procedural violations as grounds for the inadmissibility of an expert’s conclusion]. Visnyk Luhanskoho derzhavnoho universytetu vnutrishnikh sprav im. E. O. Didorenka. Vyp. 3 (99). DOI: 10.33766/2524-0323.99.173-186 [in Ukrainian].
Viter, D. (2020). Otsiniuvannia dopustymosti ta dostovirnosti vysnovku eksperta slidchym pid chas rozsliduvannia zlochyniv u sferi finansuvannia sotsialnykh tsilovykh prohram [Evaluation of admissibility and reliability of forensic expert conclusion by investigator during crime investigation]. Naukovyi visnyk Dnipropetrovskoho derzhavnoho universytetu vnutrishnikh sprav. № 3. DOI: 10.31733/2078-3566-2020-3-256-264 [in Ukrainian].
Vorobchak, A. R. (2019). Vysnovok eksperta yak dzherelo dokaziv u kryminalnomu provadzhenni [Forensic expert conclusion as a source of evidence in criminal proceedings] : dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk. Odesa. URL: https://dspace.onua.edu. ua/server/api/core/bitstreams/d2dfd0ad-7eb3-460f-965f-698f2d97b889/content [in Ukrainian].
Yatsenko, I. V. (2021). Metodyka sudovo-veterynarnoho doslidzhennia tvaryn z metoiu vstanovlennia yikh kalitstva [Methods of forensic veterinary examination of animals in order to establish their mutilation]. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
Yatsenko, I. (2022). Legal Status of Forensic Veterinarian as a Subject of Forensic Science Activity in Context of the Latest Legislation of Ukraine. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science and Criminalistics. Is. 4 (29). DOI: 10.32353/khrife.4.2022.04.
Yatsenko, I. V. (2022). Predmet sudovo-veterynarnoi ekspertyzy ta yoho znachennia v teorii i praktytsi sudovoi ekspertyzy [Topic of forensic veterinary examination and its importance in the theory and practice of forensic science]. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Seriia: Pravo. Vyp. 73. Ch. 2. DOI: 10.24144/2307-3322.2022.73.55 [in Ukrainian].
Yatsenko, I. V. (2022). Sudova veterynarna medytsyna yak navchalna komponenta dlia profesiinoho formuvannia likariv veterynarnoi medytsyny ta yii znachennia u systemi pidhotovky sudovo-veterynarnykh ekspertiv u derzhavnykh ekspertnykh ustanovakh Ukrainy [Forensic veterinary medicine as an educational component for the professional formation of veterinary medicine doctors and its importance in the training system of forensic veterinary experts in the state expert institutions of Ukraine]. Current trends in the development of modern scientific thought : Proceedings of the I International Scientific and Practical Conference (Khaifa, Izrail, 27—30.09.2022). Haifa, Israel. DOI: 10.46299/ISG.2022.2.1 [in Ukrainian].
Yatsenko, I. (2023). Epistemological Characteristic and Procedural Significance of Steps and Stages of Appointing and Conducting Forensic Veterinary Examination. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science and Criminalistics. Is. 1 (30). DOI: 10.32353/khrife.1.2023.05.
Yatsenko, I. (2023). Legal Status and Epistemological Characteristics of Forensic Veterinary Science Objects. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science and Criminalistics. Is. 2 (31). DOI: 10.32353/ khrife.2.2023.05.
Yatsenko, I. V. (2023). Zavdannia sudovo-veterynarnoi ekspertyzy: teoretychni y prakseolohichni problemy ta shliakhy yikh vyrishennia [Tasks of forensic veterinary examination: theoretical and praxeological issues and ways for their solving]. Forum prava. Vyp. 74. № 1. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7319900 [in Ukrainian].
Yatsenko, I. V., Derecha, L. M., Parylovskyi, O. І. (2020). Peculiarities of the forensic veterinarian conclusion structure based on the results of research on animal corpse bearing signs of violent death. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science and Criminalistics. Is. 21. DOI: 10.32353/khrife.1.2020.44.
Yatsenko, I. V., Kazantsev, R. H. (2022). Metodyka sudovo-veterynarnoi ekspertyzy trupiv tvaryn [Methods of forensic veterinary examination of animal corpses]. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
Yatsenko, I. V., Parylovskyi, O. I. (2022). Pravyla sudovo-veterynarnoho vyznachennia stupenia tiazhkosti shkody, zapodiianoi zdoroviu tvaryny (metodychni rekomendatsii) [Rules of Forensic Veterinary Determination of the Severity of Damage Caused to the Animal’s Health (Guidelines)]. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
Yunatskyi, O. (2023). Ustanovlennia dosto-virnosti vysnovku eksperta pid chas yoho otsinky [Establishing reliability of forensic expert’s conclusion during its assessment]. Aktualni pytannia sudovoi ekspertyzy i kryminalistyky : zb. mat-liv mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konf. z nahody 100-rich. NNTs «ISE im. Zasl. prof. M. S. Bokariusa» (Kharkiv, 10.11.2023). Kharkiv. URL: https://drive. google.com/file/d/1Kwin74kcc8IVhymxGL XWOEAccvxnpzA6/view [in Ukrainian].
Zhmudinskyi, V. P. (2022). Mekhanizm oskarzhennia ta sposoby perevirky vysnovku eksperta v kryminalnomu provadzhenni [Appeal mechanism and ways of verifying forensic expert’s conclusion in criminal proceedings]. Copernicus Political and Legal Studies. Vol. 1. Is. 3. DOI: 10.15804/CPLS.20223.06 [in Ukrainian].
Downloads
Published
2024-03-29
How to Cite
Yatsenko, I. (2024). Research, verification and evaluation of forensic expert conclusion: forensic veterinary aspect. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science and Criminalistics, 34(1), 111–131. https://doi.org/10.32353/khrife.1.2024.07
Issue
Section
Articles
