FORENSIC ACTIVITY AS AN OBJECT OF ADMINISTRATIVE AND LEGAL REGULATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32353/khrife.1.2020_17Keywords:
efficiency; administrative and legal regulation; forensic activitiesAbstract
Any society today is a system consisting of certain objects and entities that constantly interact with each other, it requires introducing an effective social and administrative mechanism that would timely regulate the social relations and norms of participants’ behavior of such relationships, maintain their organization, orderliness and stable development, contributing to proper regulatory order.
Observing the political steps of the Ukrainian government along the path of European standards, we can argue about the actualization of democratic values implementation and the establishment of an effective state power system, where the content and focus of the state determine human rights and freedoms.
Considering the above, the analysis of problematic issues arising during the study of the administrative regulation effectiveness of forensic activities is an urgent need today.
Based on the analysis of scientific sources and Ukrainian legislation, forensic activity in the article is considered as one of the administrative and legal regulation objects, the purpose of which is to establish the rule of law and strengthen institutions at all levels in the field of management in general and in law enforcement and judicial authorities in particular on the basis of the principle of human rights and fundamental freedoms respect. It should also be borne in mind that forensic science occupies a special place in implementation of the principle of rule of law and citizens’ rights and freedoms protection, since the effective functioning of the constitutional foundations of the entire human rights system of power in Ukraine largely depends on it. Thus, the current legislation of Ukraine, as part of the ongoing legal reform, should be aimed at enhancing the role and reassessing the importance of forensic examinations institution, without which investigation of the case cannot be effectively carried out and the crime solved.
References
Averyanova, T. V., Belkin, R. S., Korukhov Yu. G., Rossinskaya, E. R. (2001). Kriminal-istika: ucheb. dlya vuzov. Moscow: NORMA–INFRA M [in Russian].
Bakumenko, V. D. (2012). Derzhavno-upravlinski rishennia: navch. posib. Kyiv: VPTs AMU [in Ukrainian].
Derzhavne upravlinnia. Kovbasiuk, Yu. V., Vashchenko, K. O., Surmin, Yu. P. et al.
(Eds.). (2012). (Vols. 1– 2; Vol. 1). Kyiv; Dnipropetrovsk: NADU [in Ukrainian].
Dudych, A. V. (2016). Ekspert yak uchasnyk kryminalnoho provadzhennia. Candidates thesis: 12.00.09. Odesa [in Ukrainian].
Foris Yu. B. (2003). O formirovanii sudebno-ekspernogo prava: postanovka problemy.
Teorіya ta praktika sudovoї ekspertizi і krimіnalіstiki, issue 3 [in Russian].
Glavatskaya, N., Mezentseva, K., Serianova, S. (2005). Problems of Reforming Local Selfgovernance: Structural and Financial Aspects. Moscow: IET [in English].
Klymenko, N., Fedchyshyna, V. (2013). Z istorii rozvytku i stanovlennia Kyivskoho nau-kovo-doslidnoho instytutu sudovykh ekspertyz Ministerstva yustytsii Ukrainy. Vi-che. (Rubryka «Naukova biblioteka») [in Ukrainian].
Kolpakov, V. K. (2001). Administratyvne pravo Ukrainy: pidruchnyk. Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter [in Ukrainian].
Komissarova, Ya. V. (2013). Kontseptualnye osnovy professionalnoy deyatelnosti eksper-ta v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. (Diss. doctora yurid. nauk: 12.00.09), Moscow [in Russian].
Kontseptsiia adaptatsii zakonodavstva Ukrainy do zakonodavstva Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu: zatv. postanovoiu Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrainy vid 16 serp. 1999 r. N 1496 (1999). URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1496-99-%D0%BF [in Ukrainian].
Kozlov, Yu. M. (1976). Administrativnye pravootnosheniya. Moscow: Yurid. lit. [in Rus-sian].
Malynovskyi, V. Ya. (2005). Slovnyk terminiv i poniat z derzhavnoho upravlinnia. Kyiv:
Atika [in Ukrainian].
Oliinyk, O. O. (2013). Zarubizhnyi dosvid administratyvno-pravovoho rehuliuvannia su-dovo-ekspertnoi diialnosti. Mytna sprava, 4(88) [in Ukrainian].
Oliinyk, O. O., Halunko, V. V., Yeshchuk, O. M. (2015). Administratyvno-pravove rehuli-uvannia sudovo-ekspertnoi diialnosti. Kherson: Hrin D. S.[in Ukrainian].
Petrova, V. Yu., Semenov, A. A. (2015). Ponyatie administrativno pravovogo reguliro-vaniya. Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya, 16 [in Russian].
Proekt Zakonu pro sudovo-ekspertnu diialnist v Ukraini vid 30.03.2017 r. № 6264 (2017). URL: http://w1.c1.rada.gov.ua/pls/zweb2/webproc4_1?pf3511=61469 [in Ukrainian].
Proekt Zakonu pro sudovu ekspertyzu ta samovriaduvannia sudovykh ekspertiv vid 03.04.2018 r. № 8223 (2018). URL: http://w1.c1.rada.gov.ua/pls/zweb2/web-proc4_1?pf3511 =63780 [in Ukrainian].
Prysiazhniuk, A.V. (2016). Administratyvno-pravove zabezpechennia pasazhyrskykh per-evezen avtomobilnym transportom v Ukraini. Candidates thesis: 12.00.07. Odesa [in Ukrainian].
Pyrih, I.V. (2011). Teoretychni osnovy ekspertnoi diialnosti orhaniv vnutrishnikh sprav. Dnipropetrovsk: Dniprop. derzh. un-t vnutr. sprav ; Lira LTD [in Ukrainian].
Rusetskyi, A. A. (2017). Pro orhanizatsiiu sudovo-ekspertnoi diialnosti: mizhnarod-nyi aspekt. Teoriia ta praktyka sudovoi ekspertyzy i kryminalistyky, issue 17 [in Ukrainian].
Sehai, M.Ya. (2003). Sudova ekspertolohiia: obiekt, predmet, pryroda y systema nauky. Teoriia ta praktyka sudovoi ekspertyzy i kryminalistyky, issue 3 [in Russian].
Shemshuchenko, Yu.S. (1996). Yurydychnyi slovnyk-dovidnyk. Kyiv: Femina [in Ukrainian]. Shkolyk , A. M. (2000). Administratyvno-pravove zabezpechennia upravlinskoi diial-nosti v Ukraini. (Extended abstract of candidateʼs thesis: 12.00.07). Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Shumak, G.A., Svetlichnaya, T.A. (2016). Prognosticheskaya funktsiya sudebnoy ekono-micheskoy nauki. Pravo i demokratiya, 27 [in Russian].
Simakova-Yefremian, E.B. (2017). Teoretyko-pravovi ta metodolohichni zasady komplek-snykh sudovo-ekspertnykh doslidzhen. (Dyser. doktora urydychnykh nauk za spet-sialnistiu 12.00. 09), Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
Skorobahatko, O.V. Administratyvno-pravove rehuliuvannia naukovoho zabezpechennia funktsionuvannia systemy Ministerstva vnutrishnikh sprav Ukrainy. Candidates thesis: 12.00.07. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Skoryk, A.L., Biriukov, M. A. (2020). Poniattia ta sutnist kryminalistychnoi ekspertyzy. Teoriia i praktyka sudovoi ekspertyzy i kryminalistyky: materialy III-oi Vseu-krainskoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii, Kyiv, 27 liutoho 2020 r. Kyiv-Mari-upol, 27 February [in Ukrainian].
Smirnova, A. (2004). Sudebnaya ekspertiza na rubezhe XXI veka: Sostoyanie, razvitie, problemy. Sankt-Petersburg: Piter [in Russian].
Sniherov, O.P., Bublikov, A.V., Kurdes, E.P. (2019). Mistse eksperta v systemi subiektiv sudovo-ekspertnoi diialnosti. Teoriia ta praktyka sudovoi ekspertyzy i kryminal-istyky, issue 20 [in Ukrainian].
Teremetskyi, V.I. (2012). Poniattia administratyvno-pravovoho rehuliuvannia u sferi opo-datkuvannia. Derzhava ta rehiony. Seriia «Pravo»,1 (35) [in Ukrainian].
Uhoda pro asotsiatsiiu mizh Ukrainoiu, z odniiei storony, ta Yevropeiskym Soiuzom, Yev-ropeiskym spivtovarystvom z atomnoi enerhii i yikhnimy derzhavamy-chlenamy, z inshoi storony: mizhnarod. dokument vid 27.06.2014 № 984_011 (2014). URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/984_011.
Yakovchuk, M.Yu. (2009). Administratyvno-pravove rehuliuvannia strakhovoi diialnosti v Ukraini (Extended abstract of candidates thesis: 12.00.07). Irpin [in Ukrainian].
Yaroshevska, R.S. (2015). Mistobudivna diialnist, yak obiekt administratyvno-pravovoho rehuliuvannia. Porivnialno-analitychne pravo, 2 [in Ukrainian].
Zahalnoderzhavna prohrama adaptatsii zakonodavstva Ukrainy do zakonodavstva Yev-ropeiskoho Soiuzu: zatv. Zakonom Ukrainy «Pro Zahalnoderzhavnu prohramu adaptatsii zakonodavstva Ukrainy do zakonodavstva Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu» vid 18 ber. 2004 r. № 1629-IV (2004). URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/ show/1629-15 [in Ukrainian].
Zahumennyk, V. I., Musiienko, V. V., Protsenko, V. V. (2010). Administratyvne pravo Ukrainy: osnovni katehorii ta poniattia: navch. posib. O. Kh. Yuldasheva (Ed.). Kyiv: Polihrafist [in Ukrainian].
Zherebko, O. I. (2019). Sutnist y zmist sudovo-ekspertnoi diialnosti: vitchyznianyi dos-vid. Teoriia ta praktyka sudovoekspertnoi diialnosti: materialy VIII mizhvidom-choi konf., 27 lystop. 2019 r. Kyiv, 19, November. URL: http://elar.naiau.kiev.ua/ bitstream/123456789/15297/3/zbirnyk_ 28112019.pdf [in Ukrainian].
