SOME ISSUES OF FORENSIC RESEARCH ON ADMINISTRATIVE ADMINISTRATION BY A COMMANDER (CHIEF) AFTER IMPLEMENTATION OF JUDICIAL EXPERIENCE TASKS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32353/khrife.1.2019.46Keywords:
ecision, management decision, management officer (chief), court of military expertise, military conflict, situational, solution, study algorithm of the decision of the commander (chief).Abstract
Analysis of the participation of military units of the Armed Forces, law enforcement agencies and military formations of Ukraine in the fighting showed that more effective use of the combat capabilities of units and military formations in modern conditions, the decisive value is used as a factor a control. One of the main tasks of managerial activity is decision making. In many spheres of life of any person, whether a Manager at work or the commander (chief) of military unit, the decision-making process is the basis of management activity.
The purpose of this article is a study by theoretical analysis of the procedure for adoption of administrative decisions of the commander (chief) at the court of military forensic examination.
The analysis of scientific works of modern Ukrainian and foreign scientists who were engaged in the study of the theoretical and practical aspects of the process of decision-making has shown that these works contain provisions that are different from each other. For the result of the analysis was reviewed and revealed the contents of the concepts "decision", "management decision", "management activities of the commander (chief)".
It should be noted that the main activity of an officer (chief) at any level is the management activity, which determines the form, content and direction of the entire military team, because the commander's decision is the basis of the process of managing the military team.
It was also revealed the main aspects and factors that affect the decisions of the commander (chief) of military unit with the participation in the fighting. After all, in the course of his professional activity there are tasks that are different in meaning and that are constantly changing over time. Conducted by forensic experts, the content and sequence of the commander's work in the execution of the combat mission provided opportunities for optimization of research methods, in determining the effectiveness of managerial decisions that were made by the commander using the study algorithm. The attention is focused on the existence of a deficit of scientific and methodological support of judicial expertise of the military.
References
Bogdanuk, I.V. (2017). Sudovo-erspertne doslidzhenny zmistu priynyattya rishennya komandirom tartichnogo rivnya. Collection. Theory and practice of forensic examination and criminalistics. Vp.17. 2017 [in Ukrainian].
Dechtyar, A. (2002). Sustemniy pidchid do priynyattya derzhavno- upravlinskich rishen. Visn. National un-th o affairs. Vip. 20. 192-196 [in Ukrainian].
Derlow, D. (2001) Klyuchovi upravlinski rishennya technologiya prinyattya rishen. Kyiv: Allow; Science thought, 2001. 242.
Ignateva, A.V. Maksimtsov, M. M. (2001). Issledovanie system upravlsnnya : study allowance for high schools. Moskva: UNITI-DANA, 2001. 160 [in Russian].
Kolpakov, V. M. (2000) Teoriya I praktika priynyatiya upravlencheskih resheniy: study allowance. Kyiv: MAUP, 2000. 256 [in Ukrainian].
Kuzmin, O. E., Melnik, O. G. (2003) Osnovi menedzhmentu. Kyiv: Akademvidav, 2003 [in Ukrainian].
Меtodika sudovo-erspertnogo doslidzhennia roboti komandirsv (zhtabiv) і vіyskovich formuvan pri pіdgotovtsi і vikonanni boyovih (sluzhbovо-boyovih) zavdan. [in Ukrainian].
Shemchuk, V. A. (2010). Model rozvytku upravlinskogo mislenny v protsesi viyskovo- profesiynoyi dsyalnosti komandsra. Materials of sciences. Pr. Seminar «Development of Psychological Competence of Officials in Solving the Tasks of Military and Social Work». National Unitary Defense of Ukraine. Kyiv: NUOU, 2010. 114-117 [in Ukrainian].
Podvirna N. Ukrainska Natsionalna idea: realii ta perspektivi rozvitku Collection of scientific works. National University «Lviv Polytechnic of the Ministry of Education of Ukraine». Whip 23, 2011 [in Ukrainian].
Pro Natsionalnu bezpeku Ukraini: Law of Ukraine dated June 21, 2018 № 2469-VIII [in Ukrainian].
Pro Statut vnutrishnioy sluzhbi Zbroynih Sil Ukraini: Law of Ukraine dated March 24, 1999 № 22-23. Information from the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, 1999. № 548-XIV [in Ukrainian].
Rolin, I. F., Kaverin, O. D. (2008). Osnovy viyskovogo upravlinnya. Teaching manual. Kharkiv, 2008 [in Ukrainian].
Ryabchuk, V. D., Kovalev, V. D. (1976). Psikhologiya resheniya komandira. Moskva: Warenizdat, 1976 [in Russian].
Shemchuk, V. А. (2012). Pedagogichni umovy rozvytku upravlinskogo myslenny maybutnih magistriv viyskovogo upravlinnya v systemi pislyadyplomnoyi osvity: dis... Candidate ped Sciences: 13.00.04. Kharkiv, 2012. 175 [in Ukrainian].
Shramchenko, А. F. (1973). Voprosy psikhologii upravlinny viyskamy. M. 1973 [in Russian].
Skribitska, L.I. (2010). Оrganizatsiya pratsi menedzhera. Kiev. Center for Educational Literature. 2010 [in Ukrainian].
Smirnov, E.A. (2001). Upravlencheskie resheniya. E. A. Smirnov — Collection «Question-answer» Moskva: INFRA-M, 2001 [in Russian].
Yudin, D. B. (1989) Vichislstelnie sistemi teorii prinyatiya rtsheniy. Moskva: Science [in Russian].
