Problematic Aspects of Appointing and Conducting a Forensic Fire Investigation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32353/khrife.3.2023.04Keywords:
forensic expert, forensic fire investigation, fire scene inspection; forensic research; assessment of forensic expert’s conclusion; forensic examination objectsAbstract
The authors aimed to outline problematic aspects of individual stages in investigation of circumstances of the fire; to formulate recommendations regarding requirements for the inspection of the scene and the circle of expert witnesses who should participate in this inspection, regarding the specifics of the appointment of forensic fire investigations and further evaluation of results of the conducted research; pay attention to errors that a forensic expert may make during a forensic fire investigation and reasons for such errors. For achieving this goal, general scientific and special scientific methods are applied, in particular, analysis, synthesis, analogy; formal and logical; logical and legal; systemic and structural ones. It has been proven that methods and expert techniques determined by the investigative-expert situation at each stage of the investigation should be used to investigate the fire. In order to prevent erroneous expert conclusion, the need to update to modern level of development of science and technology and unify methodical recommendations and forensic methods for conducting forensic researches on all possible objects at each of the stages of fire investigation has been identified. It is emphasized that the following criteria should be used to evaluate the results of a forensic fire research and form forensic expert conclusion: availability of dangerous process signs; the existence of fire-hazardous process factors; coincidence of detection place of fire-hazardous factor with the fire center; possibility of combustion from such a fire-hazardous factor; justified exclusion of other possible factors of fire occurrence. Errors that are most often assumed while conducting of forensic a fire investigations and preparation of forensic expert conclusion are highlighted.
References
Bezvesilnyi, V. D., Diachenko, O. F. (2007).
Rozsliduvannia ta sudovi ekspertyzy pozhezh [Investigation and forensic examination of fires] : dovid.-metod. posib. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
Bychkova, S. F. (1994). Stanovlenie i tendencii razvitiya nauki o sudebnoj ekspertize [Formation and trends in development of forensic science]. Almaty [in Russian].
Dulov, A. V. (1992). Modeli rassledovaniya prestuplenij [Models of crime investigation]. Sovremennye dostizheniya nauchno-tehni-cheskogo progressa v borbe s prestupnostyu : tez. dokl. nauch.-prakt. konf. Minsk [in Russian].
Fire and Environmental Research Applications Team / US Forest Service. URL: https://www. fs.usda.gov/pnw/fera/research/index.shtml.
Fire Investigations. URL: https://efectis.com/ app/uploads/2022/01/Fire-Investigation-June2022.pdf.
Fire Safety Experts. URL: https://efectis.com/ app/uploads/2023/05/Efectis_Group_ Brochure_May_2023_Italian_version.pdf.
Fire Testing For Railway And Marine Sectors. URL: https://efectis.com/app/ uploads/2023/03/Efectis_Fire_testing_for_ railway_and_marine_sectors_March_2023. pdf.
Goncharenko, V. I. (1984). Nauchno-tehnicheskie sredstva v sledstvennoj praktike [Scientific and technical means in investigative practice]. Kiеv [in Russian].
Granovskij, G. L. (1968). O modelirovanii i matematicheskih metodah issledovaniya v kriminalisticheskoj ekspertize [On modeling and mathematical methods of research in forensic examination]. Problemy socialisticheskoj zakonnosti na sovremennom etape razvitiya sovetskogo gosudarstva : tez. dokl. mezhvuz. nauch. konf. (Harkov, 25.10.1968). Harkov [in Russian].
Kitseliuk, V. M. (2015). Osoblyvosti provedennia ohliadu mistsia podii pid chas rozsliduvan-nia porushen vymoh pozhezhnoi bezpeky [Specifics of scene inspection during investigation of violations of fire safety requirements]. Prykarpatskyi yurydychnyi visnyk. Vyp. 3 (9). T. 2. URL: http://pjv.nuoua. od.ua/v3-2_2015/51.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Korotkih, N. I., Martynyuk, V. I. (1982). Metodicheskoe posobie po voprosam ustanov-leniya prichin vozniknoveniya pozharov i podgotovki materialov dlya provedeniya pozharno-tehnicheskoj ekspertizy [Best practice manual on issues of establishing the causes of fires and preparing materials for forensic fire investigation]. Chernovcy [in Russian].
Lisitskyi, A. V. (2023). Vykorystannia spetsialnykh znan pid chas rozsliduvannia kryminalnykh pravoporushen, vchynenykh shliakhom pidpalu [Specific expertise use during investigation of criminal offenses committed by arson] : dys. … d-ra filos. za spets. 081 — Pravo. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Luzgin, I. M. (1983). Rekonstrukciya v kriminalisticheskih ekspertizah [Reconstruction in forensic examinations]. Sovremennye problemy sudebnoj ekspertizy i puti povysheniya effektivnosti deyatelnosti sudebno-ekspertnyh uchrezhdenij v borbe s prestupnostyu : tez. dokl. Resp. nauchn. konf. Kiev i Harkov. NIISE. Kiev [in Russian].
Mitrichev, S. P. (1986). Znachenie pozharno-tehnicheskoj ekspertizy pri rassledovanii pozharov [Importance of forensic fire investigations in investigation of fires]. Tashkentskaya kriminalisticheskaya konfe-renciya : sb. mat-lov nauch. konf. Tashkent [in Russian].
Nam, A. G. (1993). Ustanovlenie priznakov goreniya drevesiny pola s razlich-nymi pokrytiyami v prisutstvii legkovo-splamenyayushihsya zhidkostej (LVZh) ili goryuchej zhidkosti (GZh) neftyanoj prirody [Establishment of signs of burning floor wood with various coatings in availability of flammable liquids (FL) or combustible liquid (CL) of petroleum nature]. Ekspertnaya praktika : sb. metod. rek. Vyp. 1 [in Russian].
Nam, A. G. (2002). Metodicheskie podhody k provedeniyu integracionnyh ekspertnyh issledovanij po ustanovleniyu elementov mehanizma pozhara [Methodological approaches to conducting integration forensic research to identify elements of fire mechanism]. Teoreticheskie i prakticheskie voprosy sudebnoj ekspertizy : sb. nauch. tr. CSE Minyusta Resp. Kazahstan. Vyp. 5 [in Russian].
Rozrobka metodyky z teoretychnykh ta praktychnykh osnov provedennia sudovykh pozhezhno-tekhnichnykh ekspertyz (2019) [Development of methods for theoretical and practical foundations of forensic fire investigation] : zvit pro NDR № derzhreiestr. 0118U000977 ; nauk. kerivn. O. B. Shmereho / KNDISE. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Selivanov, N. A. (1962). Nekotorye voprosy teorii i praktiki kompleksnoj ekspertizy [Some issues of the theory and practice of forensic multidisciplinary examination]. Voprosy sudebnoj ekspertizy : tez. dokl. nauch. konf. Tbilisi [in Russian].
Shmereho, O. B. (2020). Vykorystannia spetsialnykh znan pry provedenni pozhezhno-tekhnichnykh ekspertyz ta ekspertnykh doslidzhen [Specific expertise use of in conducting forensic fire investigations and forensic researches]. Kryminalistyka i sudova ekspertyza. Vyp. 65. DOI: 10.33994/ kndise.2020.65.42 [in Ukrainian].
Tileubergenov, E. M. (2015). Teoreticheskie i prakticheskie problemy primeneniya dannyh estestvennyh i tehnicheskih nauk v processe raskrytiya i rassledovaniya prestuplenij [Theoretical and practical problems of the application of data from natural and technical sciences in the process of solving and investigating crimes] : dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk. Bishkek [in Russian].
Tsymbal, M. L. (2004). Rozsliduvannia pozhezh (ohliad mistsia podii ta problemy zastosuvannia spetsialnykh znan) [Investigation of fires (review of the scene and issues of specific expertise application)] : monohrafiia ; za red. d-ra yuryd. nauk, prof. V. Yu. Shepitka. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
Zahalni polozhennia inzhenerno-tekhnichnykh doslidzhen nebezpek u zhyttiediialnosti (2009) [General provisions of engineering researches on hazards in vital activity] : zvit pro NDR № derzhreiestr. 0108U000447 ; nauk. kerivn. O. F. Diachenko / KhNDISE. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
