Effective administrative and legal regulation of forensic activities in the context of European integration

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32353/khrife.2.2021.11

Keywords:

efficiency; administrative and legal regulation; forensic science activity; goals; tasks; European integration.

Abstract

Effective administrative and legal regulation of forensic activity depends on the goals and objectives. Ukrainian society began to radically restructure its national system of law, enshrining the principle of the rule of law in the Constitution in 1996 and ratifying in 1997 the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.

This article purpose is to define the main goals and objectives of the state to ensure effective forensic activities in the context of European integration. Ukrainian obligations to European community to build a developed and sustainable democracy and market economy require it, first of all, to focus the entire national system of law on such European values as democracy, respect for people and fundamental rights and freedoms, the rule of law, etc. For our state, the principle of the rule of law is related to the practice of the European Union, therefore, the main strategic direction is European integration.

Within the framework of European cooperation, the field of justice in general and law enforcement and judicial authorities in particular are acquiring particular importance. Effective implementation of judicial reform and the fight against corruption are currently the priority areas of our state on the way to European integration.

An important part of implementation of this goal is creation of a modern system of forensic science support of justice that should function effectively through the timely and proper implementation of the goals and objectives set before the subjects of forensic science.

References

Bachennia, misiia, tsinnosti (za danymy Ministerstva yustytsii Ukrainy) [Vision, Mission, Values (according to the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine)]. URL: https://minjust.gov.ua/pages/mission [in Ukrainian].

Buklet Tsentru 2021 r. (za danymy Naukovo-doslidnoho tsentru sudovoi ekspertyzy z pytan intelektualnoi vlasnosti Ministerstva yustytsii Ukrainy). URL: https://intelect.org.ua/wp-content/ uploads/2020/12/buklet_czentru-2021.pdf [in Ukrainian].

Filipenko, N., Spitsyna, H., Shynkarenko, I., Tsymbalistyi, V. Implementation of Preventive Activity; Foreign Experience in Criminological Work of Forensic Science Institutions. Electronic Scientific Journal Socrates. Vol. 1. № 19. DOI: 10.25143/socr.19.2020.1.032-038.

Klimenko, N. I., Kupriievych, O. A. (2015). Mizhnarodne spivrobitnytstvo sudovo-ekspertnykh ustanov [International Cooperation of Forensic Science Institutions]. Visnyk kryminalnoho sudochynstva. № 4 [in Ukrainian].

Kliuiev, O. M. (2019). Udoskonalennia ekspertnoho zabezpechennia pravosuddia: teoretychni, pravovi ta orhanizatsiini aspekty [Improving Forensic Science Support of Justice: Theoretical, Legal and Organizational Aspects]. Teoriia ta praktyka sudovoi ekspertyzy i kryminalistyky. Vyp. 19. DOI: 10.32353/khrife.1.2019.08 [in Ukrainian].

Kolomoiets, T. O., Baranchyk, P. O. (2012). Pryntsypy administratyvnoho prava [Principles of Administrative Law] : monohrafiia. Zaporizhzhia [in Ukrainian].

Koly Ukraina stane chlenom Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu? (za danymy Uriadovoi kampanii EUKraina) [When will Ukraine Become a Member of European Union? (according to the EU Government Country Government Campaign)]. URL: https:// association4u.in.ua/?utm_source=search&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=association4u_ search_mpb&utm_term=21.12.20&gclid=Cj0KCQiA1pyCBhCtARIsAHaY_5eATqpz x0LNXnsKcLWlrPbqFS4f3imPdqqDRnD_a5ksTzBzEJ0SPwAaAhLHEALw_wcB#european_ integration [in Ukrainian].

Kornieiev, S. M. (2015). Suchasni problemy rozvytku sudovoi ekspertyzy v aspekti yevrointehratsii Ukrainy [Current Issues of Forensic Science Development in the Aspect of Ukraine European integration]. Sudovo-ekspertna diialnist: suchasnyi stan ta perspektyvy rozvytku : zb. mat-liv kruhloho stolu (Kyiv, 23.04.2015). Kyiv. URL: https://www. naiau.kiev.ua/news/sudovo-ekspertna-diyalnistsuchasnij-stan-ta-perspektivi-rozvitku.html [in Ukrainian].

Oliinyk, O. O. (2013). Zarubizhnyi dosvid administratyvno-pravovoho rehuliuvannia sudovo-ekspertnoi diialnosti [Foreign Experience of Administrative and Legal Regulation of Forensic Activity]. Mytna sprava. № 4 (88) [in Ukrainian].

Oliinyk, O. O., Halunko, V. V., Yeshchuk, O. M. (2015). Administratyvno-pravove rehuliuvannia sudovoekspertnoi diialnosti [Administrative and Legal Regulation of Forensic Activity] : monohrafiia. Kherson [in Ukrainian].

Ovsiannykova, I. M. (2020). Sudovo-ekspertna diialnist yak obiekt administratyvno-pravovoho rehuliuvannia [Forensic Activity as Object of Administrative and Legal Regulation]. Teoriia ta praktyka sudovoi ekspertyzy i kryminalistyky. Vyp. 21. DOI: 10.32353/khrife.1.2020.017 [in Ukrainian].

Plakhotniuk, N., Koruts, U., Doroshenko, E. (2021). Constitutional Restriction on Human Rights and Freedoms in the Development of Liberal Democracy in Europe. Access to Justice in Eastern Europe. Vol. 3. № 11. DOI: 10.33327/AJEE-18- 4.3-n000075.

Rusetskyi, A. A. (2017). Pro orhanizatsiiu sudovoekspertnoi diialnosti: mizhnarodnyi aspekt [On Management of Forensic Activities: International Aspect]. Teoriia ta praktyka sudovoi ekspertyzy i kryminalistyky. Vyp. 17 [in Ukrainian].

Simakova-Yefremian, E. B. (2017). Do pytannia pro vzaiemozalezhnist yevropeiskykh intehratsiinykh protsesiv i tendentsii intehratsii spetsialnykh znan v Ukraini [On the Issue of Interdependence of European Integration Processes and Trends in Integration of Specific Expertise in Ukraine].

Teoriia ta praktyka sudovoi ekspertyzy i kryminalistyky. Vyp. 17 [in Ukrainian].

Skoryk, A. L., Biriukov, M. A. (2020). Poniattia ta sutnist kryminalistychnoi ekspertyzy [Concept and Essence of forensic Science]. Teoriia i praktyka sudovoi ekspertyzy i kryminalistyky : matly III Vseukr. nauk.-prakt. konf. (Kyiv, 27.02.2020). Kyiv ; Mariupol [in Ukrainian].

Statut Natsionalnoho naukovoho tsentru «Instytut sudovykh ekspertyz im. Zasl. prof. M.S. Bokariusa» (za danymy NNTs «ISE im. Zasl. prof. M. S. Bokariusa») [Charter of National Scientific Center «Hon. Prof. M. S. Bokarius Forensic Science Institute» «(according to NSC «Hon. Prof. M. S. Bokarius FSI»)]. URL: https://www. hniise.gov.ua/14136-statut.html [in Ukrainian].

Stefanchuk, M., Hladun, O., Stefanchuk, R. (2021). Establishing Trust in the Court in Ukraine as a Strategic Task for Judicial Reform. Access to Justice in Eastern Europe. Vol. 3. № 11. DOI: 10.33327/AJEE-18-4.3-n000073.

Suspilno-politychni oriientatsii naselennia Ukrainy (za danymy Kyivskoho mizhnarodnoho instytutu sotsiolohii za kviten 2020 r.) [Social and Political Orientations of Ukrainian Population of (according to Kyiv International Institute of Sociology in April 2020)]. URL: https://www. kiis.com.ua/materials/pr/20200406_pressconf/ politics_april%202020.pdf [in Ukrainian].

Ukrainskyi naukovo-doslidnyi instytut spetsialnoi tekhniky ta sudovykh ekspertyz SBU (za danymy Sluzhby bezpeky Ukrainy) [Ukrainian Research Institute of Special Equipment and Forensic Science of the Security Service of Ukraine (according to the Security Service of Ukraine)]. URL: https://ssu.gov.ua/naukovo-doslidnytskyiinstytut [in Ukrainian].

Yakoviuk, I. V. (2014). Pravovi osnovy yevropeiskoi intehratsii ta yii vplyv na derzhavno-pravovyi rozvytok Ukrainy [Legal bases of European Integration and its Influence on State and Legal Development of Ukraine]: dys. … d-ra yuryd. nauk. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].

Zherebko, O. I. (2019). Sutnist y zmist sudovoekspertnoi diialnosti: vitchyznianyi dosvid [Essence and Content of Forensic Activity: Domestic Experience]. Teoriia ta praktyka sudovo-ekspertnoi diialnosti : zb. mat-liv VIII mizhvidom. nauk.-prakt. konf. (Kyiv, 27.11.2019). Kyiv. URL: http://elar.naiau.kiev.ua/ bitstream/123456789/15401/1/zbirnyk_27_11_19. pdf [in Ukrainian].

Published

2021-12-10

How to Cite

Ovsiannykova, I. (2021). Effective administrative and legal regulation of forensic activities in the context of European integration. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science and Criminalistics, 24(2), 171–185. https://doi.org/10.32353/khrife.2.2021.11