THE SYSTEM OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES INTERACTING WITH FORENSIC SCIENCE INSTITUTES
Abstract
The article outlines the content and features of the system of law enforcement agencies interacting with forensic science institutes. The concept of law enforcement agencies and their system are studied. The characteristics of the general category of interaction of law enforcement agencies with forensic science institutes have been determined. Signs of interaction of forensic science institutes with law enforcement agencies have been established. It is also found that today problems of cooperation of law enforcement agencies with forensic scientists require detailed study and identification of gaps in legal and regulatory frameworks, determination of ways for their elimination. It should be emphasized that signs of cooperation of forensic science institutions with law enforcement agencies may include the following: joint activity of the indicated legal entities regulated by administrative regulations and other fields of law; agreed on goals, tasks, place, time, means and methods of activity; aimed at achieving common goals and results; the content of interaction is determined by set tasks and results, it is aimed at fulfilling them; parties bear responsibility for nonperformance or improper execution of interaction tasks. Cooperation of forensic science institutes with law enforcement authorities called to provide skilled, rapid and objective execution of criminal proceedings tasks as well as application of special knowledge in other areas of law-enforcement activity.
References
Borodin, S. V. (1967). Nekotorye voprosy vzaimodeistviia operativnogo rabotnika i sledovatelia okhrany obshchestvennogo poriadka. Trudy VNII MOOP. Moscow [in Russian].
Burbyka, V. O. (2017). Administratyvno-pravovi zasady vzaiemodii orhaniv mistsevoho samovriaduvannia z pravookhoronnymy orhanamy (candidates thesis). Sumy [in Ukrainian].
Instruktsiia pro poriadok zaluchennia pratsivnykiv orhaniv dosudovoho rozsliduvannia politsii ta Ekspertnoi sluzhby Ministerstva vnutrishnikh sprav Ukrainy yak spetsialistiv dlia uchasti v provedenni ohliadu mistsia podii: zatv. nakazom MVS Ukrainy vid 03.11.2015 r. № 1339. URL: http://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/ z1392-15 (data zvernennia: 10.09.2020) [in Ukrainian].
Instruktsiia pro pryznachennia ta provedennia sudovykh ekspertyz ta ekspertnykh doslidzhen: zatv. nakazom Miniustu Ukrainy vid 08.10.1998 r. № 53/5 (zi zmin. ta dopov.). URL: http://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0705-98 (data zvernennia: 10.09.2020) [in Ukrainian].
Kagan, M. S. (1988). Mir obshcheniia: problemy mezhsubektnykh otnoshenii. Moscow [in Russian].
Korzh, V. P. (2000). Deiaki problemy vzaiemodii slidchoho z uchasnykamy rozkryttia ta rozsliduvannia ekonomichnykh orhanizovanykh zlochyniv. Visnyk prokuratury. № 1 (13) [in Ukrainian].
Kryminalnyi protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy (2013): Zakon Ukrainy vid 13.04.2012 r. № 4651-VI (zi zmin. ta dopov.). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy (VVR). № 9–10, 11–12, 13. St. 88 [in Ukrainian].
Melnyk, K. Yu. (2009). Problemy pravovoho rehuliuvannia trudovykh vidnosyn sluzhbovtsiv pravookhoronnykh orhaniv: monohrafiia. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
Muzychuk, O. M. (2010). Kontrol za diialnistiu pravookhoronnykh orhaniv v Ukraini: administratyvno-pravovi zasady orhanizatsii ta funktsionuvannia: dys. … d-ra yuryd. nauk. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
Naumenko, S. M. (2019). Administratyvno-pravovi zasady vzaiemodii ekspertnykh ustanov z pravookhoronnymy orhanamy (candidates thesis). Sumy [in Ukrainian].
Nazar, Yu. S. (2006). Vzaiemodiia terytorialnykh orhaniv vnutrishnikh sprav iz mistsevymy orhanamy vykonavchoi vlady ta orhanamy mistsevoho samovriaduvannia u profilaktytsi administratyvnykh pravoporushen (candidates thesis). Lviv [in Ukrainian].
Pchelina, O. V. (2017). Teoretychni zasady formuvannia ta realizatsii metodyky rozsliduvannia zlochyniv u sferi sluzhbovoi diialnosti: dys. … d-ra yuryd. nauk. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
Polozhennia pro Ekspertnu sluzhbu Ministerstva vnutrishnikh sprav Ukrainy: zatv. nakazom MVS Ukrainy vid 03.11.2015 r. № 1343 (zi zmin. ta dopov.). URL: http://zakon5.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z1390-15 (data zvernennia: 10.09.2020) [in Ukrainian].
Poplavska, S. D. (2009). Formuvannia hotovnosti studentiv medychnykh koledzhiv do komunikatyvnoi vzaiemodii u profesiinii diialnosti. (Abstract of candidates thesis). Zhytomyr [in Ukrainian].
Pro derzhavnyi zakhyst pratsivnykiv sudu i pravookhoronnykh orhaniv (1994): Zakon Ukrainy vid 23.12.1993 r. № 3781-XII (zi zmin. ta dopov.)//Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy (VVR). № 11. St. 50 [in Ukrainian].
Reshetnikova, I. V. (1997). Dokazatelstvennoe pravo Anglii i SShA. Ekaterinburg [in Russian].
Shoptenko, S. S. (2017). Shchodo zmistu poniattia «pravookhoronnyi orhan». Prykarpatskyi yurydychnyi visnyk. № 3 [in Ukrainian].
Shoptenko, S. S. (2017). Systema pravookhoronnykh orhaniv Ukrainy. Naukovyi visnyk publichnoho ta pryvatnoho prava. Vyp. 3. [in Ukrainian].
Shoptenko, S. S. (2018). Administratyvno-yurysdyktsiina diialnist pravookhoronnykh orhaniv v Ukraini. Ed.: O. M. Muzychuka. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
Sokolenko, O. L. (2012). Administratyvno-pravovi zasady zakhystu prav hromadian u diialnosti pravookhoronnykh orhaniv: dys. … d-ra yuryd. nauk. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
Sudebnye i pravookhranitelnye organy Ukrainy (1999): uchebnik. Ed.: A. M. Bandurka. Kharkov [in Russian].
Sushchenko, V. D., Smyrnov, A. M., Kovalenko, O. I., Smirnov, A. A. (1999). Orhanizatsiia upravlinnia personalom v orhanakh vnutrishnikh sprav: monohraf. doslidzh. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Tertyshnyk, V. M. (2004). Naukovo-praktychnyi komentar do Kryminalno-protsesualnoho kodeksu Ukrainy. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Tkachenko, N. M. (2016). Subiekty sudovo-ekspertnoi diialnosti v suchasnii systemi ekspertnoho zabezpechennia kryminalnoho provadzhennia (candidates thesis). Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
Yurydychnyi slovnyk-dovidnyk. (1996). Ed.: Yu. S. Shemshuchenko. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Abstract views: 328 PDF Downloads: 1140
