Strategies for Minimizing Errors in Forensic Expert Practice

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32353/khrife.4.2024.03

Keywords:

forensic activity; forensic examination; error minimization; cognitive bias; modern technologies; artificial intelligence; automated systems; standardization; professional training; ethical standards.

Abstract

The Article Purpose is to enhance the understanding of error minimization strategies in forensic expert activity through an in-depth analysis of the most frequent errors and the development of new approaches to avoid them; to emphasize the classification of errors in order to identify key factors of their occurrence; to focus on the impact of cognitive biases, inadequate training of forensic experts and the lack of uniform standards; to develop recommendations for improving the system of training and certification of forensic experts; to address ethical aspects for the work of forensic experts. General scientific and special methods have been used to achieve this goal. The paper outlines strategies for minimizing errors in forensic expert activity; the impact of cognitive biases; issues of introducing state-of-the-art technologies, improving the system of forensic experts’ training and certification, as well as ethical dimensions of work. The author develops the main strategies for minimizing errors in forensic expert activity, which are of paramount theoretical and practical importance. A comprehensive approach to minimizing errors has been developed. Different aspects of the problem have been brought together to create a comprehensive approach to its resolution. Emphasis has been made on cognitive biases, insufficient training of forensic experts, and the lack of uniform standards. The impact of modern technologies on reducing the number of errors has been assessed. Recommendations have been proposed to improve the system of training and certification of forensic experts, as well as to adhere to high ethical standards.

References

Abramova, V. M. (2004). Ekspertni pomylky: sutnist, henezys, shliakhy podolannia [Expert Errors: Essence, Genesis, Ways to Overcome Them] : dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Cooper, G., Meterko, V. (2019). Cognitive Bias Research in Forensic Science: A Systematic Review. Forensic Science International. Vol. 297. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.01.016.

Croskerry, P. (2003). The importance of cognitive errors in diagnosis and strategies to minimize them. Academic Medicine. Vol. 78. Is. 8. DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200308000-00003.

Giannelli, P. C. (2007). Wrongful Convictions and Forensic Science: The Need to Regulate Crime Labs. North Carolina Law Review. Vol. 86 Is. 1. Art. 4. URL: https://scholarship.law.unc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4293&context=nclr.

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. NY. URL: http://dspace.vnbrims.org:13000/ jspui/bitstream/123456789/2224/1/DanielKahneman-Thinking-Fast-and-Slow-.pdf.

Kassin, S. M., Dror, I. E., Kukucka, J. (2013). The forensic confirmation bias: Problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. Vol. 2. Is. 1. DOI: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.01.001.

Kopylchenko, T. Yu. (2010). Ekspertni pomylky u pocherkoznavchomu doslidzhenni ta shliakhy yikh podolannia [The Expert Mistakes in Handwriting Research and the Way of Their Overcoming] : avtoref. dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk. Kyiv. URL: https://dspace.nlu.edu. ua//jspui/handle/123456789/13676 [in Ukrainian].

Latysh, K., Demydova, Ye., Domashenko, O., Kolesnikova, I. (2022). Ekspertni pomylky pid chas provedennia okremykh vydiv sudovykh ekspertyz u sferi informatsiinykh tekhnolohii [Expert’s Mistakes During Conducting Some Types of Criminalistics Expertise in the Field of Information Technologies]. Yurydychnyi visnyk. № 2. DOI: 10.32837/yuv.v0i2.2326 [in Ukrainian].

Maksymenko, M. I. (2022). Napriamky profilaktychnoi diialnosti po nedopushchenniu ekspertnykh pomylok [Directions of Preventive Activities in Order to Prevent Expert Errors]. Yurydychnyi naukovyi elektronnyi zhurnal. № 10. DOI: 10.32782/2524- 0374/2022-10/144 [in Ukrainian].

Nakhaeizadeh, Sh., Dror, I. E., Morgan, R. M. (2014). Cognitive bias in forensic anthropology: Visual assessment of skeletal remains is susceptible to confirmation bias. Science & Justice. Vol. 54. Is. 3. DOI: 10.1016/j.scijus.2013.11.003.

Reese, E. J. (2012). Techniques for Mitigating Cognitive Biases in Fingerprint Identification. UCLA Law Review. Vol. 59. Is. 5. URL: https:// www.uclalawreview.org/pdf/59-5-3.pdf.

Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward (2009) / National Academy of Sciences. Washington, D. С. URL: https:// www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/228091.pdf.

Published

2024-12-30

How to Cite

Bondarenko-Berehovych, V. (2024). Strategies for Minimizing Errors in Forensic Expert Practice. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science and Criminalistics, 37(4), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.32353/khrife.4.2024.03