Conducting Forensic Multidisciplinary Examinations and Sets of Forensic Examinations Using Specific Expertise in Economics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32353/khrife.1.2024.12Keywords:
multidisciplinary forensic examination; sets of forensic examinations.Abstract
The quality of forensic examination depends on a forensic expert’s qualification and his/her in-depth and responsible research on objects, the investigation of which arose during pre-trial investigation or trial. Currently, expert methodologies for conducting multidisciplinary forensic economic examinations and sets of forensic examinations require improvement, especial-ly in light of wartime conditions. Multidisciplinary examination reflects contemporary theoretical trends by integrating legal norms into practical application to address urgent tasks in pre-trial investigations and court proceedings. The most efficient approach is to use a set of methods and technical means that give rise to new branches of scientific knowledge, determine the regularities of their practical significance, and establish interdisciplinary links. At the same time, multidisciplinary examination demonstrates high efficiency and broad possibilities through the combined and synthesized application of knowledge from diverse scientific fields and technical tools in addressing tasks assigned to a forensic expert. Sequential conduct of various types of forensic examinations during the resolution of multidisciplinary tasks in some cases ensures the reliability of expert conclusions and optimizes the judicial process. Multidisciplinary examination conclusions have a varied impact on the decisions made by the parties to the dispute. Therefore, improving the methodology of conducting multidisciplinary forensic examinations or sets of forensic examinations during the resolution of complex issues, which often arise in conditions of martial law, is relevant. This allows for the determination of unified approaches to addressing problematic aspects of such research.
References
Bondarenko, O. O. (2012). Klasyfikatsiia sudovykh ekspertyz u kryminalnomu sudochynstvi [Classification of forensic examinations in a criminal proceeding]. Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni V. N. Karazina. Seriia «Pravo». № 1028 (12). URL: https://univd.edu.ua/ science-issue/issue/749 [in Ukrainian].
Chabaniuk, O. M., Loboda, N. O. (2022). Kompleksna sudova ekspertyza ta osoblyvosti yii provedennia [Multidisciplinary forensic examination and peculiarities of its conduct]. Suchasni problemy ekolohii : tezy KhVIII Vseukr. nauk. on-line konf. zdobuv. vyshch. osvity i molod. uchen. z mizhnar. uchastiu (Zhytomyr, 06.10.2022). URL: https://conf.ztu.edu.ua/wp-content/ uploads/2022/11/37.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Dondyk, H. P. (2013). Osoblyvosti protsesu doslidzhennia pry provedenni komisiinykh ta kompleksnykh ekspertyz [Features of research process in conducting commission and comprehensive forensic examinations]. Uchenye zapiski Tavricheskogo nacionalnogo universiteta im. V. I. Vernadskogo. Seriya «Yuridicheskie nauki». T. 26 (65). № 2—2. URL: https://juris.vernadskyjournals. in.ua/journals/2013/2-2_2013/55.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Dzhuzha, O. M., Vasylevych, V. V., Cher-niei, V. V., Cherniavskyi, S. S. ta in. (2020). Kryminolohiia [Criminology] : pidruchnyk / za zah. red. V. V. Chernieia ; za nauk. red. O. M. Dzhuzhi. Kyiv. URL: https://vo.uu.edu.ua/pluginfile.php/520868/mod_resource/co ntent/3/2020_%D0%9F%D1%96%D0%B4%D1%80%D1%83%D1%87%D0%BD%D0%B 8%D0%BA_%D0%9A%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%BC%D1%96%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%BB %D0%BE%D0%B3%D1%96%D1%8F.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Kapustnik, K., Khomutenko, O., Kipouras, P. (2022). On Improvement of Scientific and Methodological Basis for Conducting Forensic Economic Examinations Considering Other Types of Forensic Examinations (review article). Theory and Practice of Forensic Science and Criminalistics. Is. 4 (29). P. 160—169. DOI: 10.32353/ khrife.4.2022.06.
Kerevych, O. V. (2015). Osoblyvosti pryznachennia sudovykh ekspertyz dlia vstanovlennia indyvidualno-psykholohichnykh osoblyvostei pidozriuvanoho (obvynuvachu-vanoho) [Features purpose of forensic examination to establish individual psychological characteristics of the suspect (accused)]. Visnyk kryminalnoho sudochynstva. № 2. URL: https://vkslaw.knu. ua/images/verstka/2_2015_Kerevuch.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Klymenko, N. I. (2019). Poniattia ta zavdannia zahalnoi teorii sudovoi ekspertolohii v systemi yurydychnykh nauk [Theory of forensic expertology in the system of law]. Kryminalistyka i sudova ekspertyza. Vyp. 64. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/ krise_2019_64_6 [in Ukrainian].
Kostytskyi, M. V., Lutskyi, M. I. (2011). Sudovo-psykholohichna ekspertyza v administra-tyvnomu protsesi [Forensic psychological examination in administrative process] : monohrafiia. Ivano-Frankivsk [in Ukrainian].
Sehai, M. Ya., Nadhornyi, H. M., Isakovych, B. M. (1999). Propozytsii z pytan udoskonalennia rehlamentatsii sudovoi ekspertyzy v proektakh protsesualnykh kodeksiv Ukrainy [Proposals on the improvement of forensic examination regulation in Ukrainian draft procedural codes]. Visnyk Akademii pravovykh nauk Ukrainy. № 2 (17). [in Ukrainian].
Shcherbakovskyi, M. H. (2015). Provedennia ta vykorystannia sudovykh ekspertyz u kry-minalnomu provadzhenni [Conducting and utilizing forensic examinations in a criminal proceeding] : monohrafiia. Kharkiv. URL: https://dspace.univd.edu.ua/server/api/ core/bitstreams/0dd2821b-1646-4d5c-965f-c20e08dc1479/content [in Ukrainian].
Shulha, Yu. O. (2018). Osoblyvosti zaluchennia eksperta na pochatkovomu etapi roz-sliduvannia rozboiv, vchynenykh iz pronyknenniam u zhytlo [Peculiarities of involving an expert at the initial stage of investigation of home-invasion robberies]. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Seriia: Pravo. Vyp. 53. T. 2. URL: https://dspace.uzhnu.edu. ua/jspui/handle/lib/30686 [in Ukrainian].
Simakova-Yefremian, E. B. (2006). Sutnist subiekta intehratsii znan pry provedenni kompleksnykh sudovo-ekspertnykh doslidzhen [The essence of the subject of knowledge integration when conducting comprehensive forensic research]. Teoriia ta praktyka sudovoi ekspertyzy i kryminalistyky. Vyp. 6 [in Ukrainian].
Simakova-Yefremian, E. B. (2017). Teoretyko-pravovi ta metodolohichni zasady komp-leksnykh sudovo-ekspertnykh doslidzhen [Theoretical-legal and methodological foundations of complex forensic research] : avtoref. dys. ... d-ra yuryd. nauk. Kharkiv. URL: https://dspace.nlu. edu.ua//jspui/handle/123456789/13451 [in Ukrainian].
Sliusarenko, V. Ye. (2020). Ekonomichna ekspertyza. Teoriia i praktyka v Ukraini [Economic examination. Theory and practice in Ukraine]. Ekspert: paradyhmy yurydychnykh nauk i derzhavnoho up-ravlinnia. № 3 (9). DOI: 10.32689/2617-9660-2020-3(9)-101-107 [in Ukrainian].
Smyrnyi, M. F. (2018). Osnovy naukovykh doslidzhen [Scientific Research Fundamen-tals] : konspekt lektsii (dlia student. usikh form navch. za spets. 141 — Elektroenerh., elektrotekhn. ta elektromekh.). Kharkiv. URL: https://core.ac.uk/download/ pdf/162019668.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Veretun, H. S. (2018). Osoblyvosti ta vidminnosti poniat «kompleksna ekspertyza» ta «kom-pleks ekspertyz» [Features and distinctions of concepts «complex expertise» and «ex-pertises complex»]. Visnyk ONDISE. Vyp. 3. URL: http://ondise.od.ua/DOC/vipusk3/oso blivostitavidminostiponyatkomplecexperti za.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Yurchyshyn, V. D. (2013). Analiz ta klasyfikatsiia vysnovkiv eksperta u kryminalnomu provadzheni: teoretychnyi ta praktychnyi aspekty [Analysis and classification conclusions of expert in criminal proceedings: theoretical and practical aspects]. Prykarpatskyi yurydychnyi visnyk. Vyp. 1 (3). URL: http:// www.pjv.nuoua.od.ua/v1_2013/42.pdf [in Ukrainian].
