Forensic Disinformation as a Tactical and Forensic Means of Detecting and Solving Corruption Criminal Offenses

Authors

  • Larysa Bielik
  • Antonina Cheremnova

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32353/khrife.4.2023.02

Keywords:

corruption criminal offenses; forensic disinformation; investigative and operational search activities; detection and solving crimes.

Abstract

The article purpose is to study the peculiarities of implementing forensic disinformation as a tactical and forensic means for detecting and solving corruption criminal offenses. To achieve this goal, formal-logical and system-structural methods were used. Article 45 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine distinguishes two groups of corruption criminal offenses, during the detection and disclosure of which suspects (accused) provide false information about the method of preparation, commission or concealment of their criminal activity. The essence of criminal and forensic disinformation is compared. The author examines the practice of the US Supreme Court regarding the legality of using disinformation by police officers in identifying racketeers and corrupt organizations. The author substantiates the moral grounds for the use of forensic disinformation. It is noted that the legend remains an effective and classical means of its implementation, and the most common form is the tactical operation “staging”. The author distinguishes between the features of forensic and criminal staging. It is noted that forensic staging (as opposed to criminal staging) is a legitimate and constructive means of safeguarding and protecting the interests of an individual, society and the State from corruption criminal offenses. The author identifies the criteria for the use of forensic disinformation and defines its rules: 1) focus on the task; 2) validity, timeliness, mobility, efficiency, and flexibility; 3) compliance with the plan and the approved plan; 4) personnel, financial and logistical support; 5) situational validity, taking into account the personality of the offender; 6) creative approach with due regard for possible changes in the situation; 7) visualization.

References

Bandurka, O. M., Bandurka, I. O. (2020). Zlochynnist i suchasnist [Crime and modernity] : monohrafiia. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].

Kohutych, I. I. (2021). Taktychni skladovi dii prokurora z ukladennia uhody pro vyznannia vynuvatosti obvynuvachenym [Tactical components of the prosecutor’s actions to conclude a plea bargain with the accused]. Kryminalistyka i sudova ekspertyza. Vyp. 66. DOI: 10.33994/kndise.2021.66.20 [in Ukrainian].

Lukashevych, V. H. (2016). Dokazy ta dokazuvannia v kryminalno-protsesualnomu ta kryminalistychnomu vymiri [Evidence and proof in the criminal procedural and forensic dimensions]. Derzhava ta rehiony. Seriia: Pravo. № 1 (51). URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/drp_2016_1_16 [in Ukrainian].

Pohoretskyi, M., Starenkyi, O. (2018). Chomu rezultaty NS(R)D ne budut dokazamy bez rozsekrechuvannia dozvoliv na yikh provedennia [Why the results of CI (D) A will not be evidence without declassification of the permits for their conduct]. Zakon i biznes [Elektronnyi resurs]. Vyp. № 47 (1397). URL: https://zib.com.ua/ua/135424.html [in Ukrainian].

Pohoretskyi, M., Starenkyi, O. (2018). Nehlasni slidchi (rozshukovi) dii yak zasoby otrymannia dokaziv: okremi problemni pytannia [Covert investigative (detective) actions as a means of obtaining evidence: some problematic issues]. Pravo Ukrainy. № 8. DOI: 10.33498/louu-2018-08-085 [in Ukrainian].

RICO Offenses (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations). Prepared by the Office of the General Counsel. URL: https://www.ussc.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/training/primers/2023_Primer_RICO.pdf.

Shepitko, V. (2021). Theoretical and methodological model of criminalistics and its new directions. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science and Criminalistics. Is. 3 (25). DOI: 10.32353/khrife.3.2021.02.

Shepitko, V., Shepitko, M. Formuvannia tsyfrovoi kryminalistyky yak stratehichnyi napriamok rozvytku nauky [Formation of digital forensics as a strategic direction of science development]. Criminalistics and Forensic Expertology: Science, Studies, Practice : XVII Medzinarodny Kongres Kriminalistika a Forenzne Vedy (Bratislava, Slovenská republika, 16—17.09.2021). Bratislava [in Ukrainian].

Stashchak, M. V., Pleskach, O. Yu. (2020). Vykorystannia dezinformatsii pidrozdilamy kryminalnoi politsii v umovakh pravovoi derzhavy [The use of disinformation by criminal police units in the context of the rule of law]. Suchasni problemy pravovoho, ekonomichnoho ta sotsialnoho rozvytku derzhavy : tezy dop. Mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konf. (Kharkiv, 27.11.2020). Kharkiv. URL: https://dspace.univd.edu.ua/server/api/core/bitstreams/f27afe88-6df0-447b-82a8-563388f5b7bf/content [in Ukrainian].

Tishchenko, V. V. (2017). Shchodo poniattia, zavdan i zmistu kryminalistychnoi taktyky [On the concept, tasks and content of forensic tactics]. Tradytsii ta novatsii yurydychnoi nauky: mynule, suchasnist, maibutnie : mat-ly Mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konf. (Odesa, 19.05.2017). U 2 t. T. 2. Odesa. URL: http://hdl.handle.net/11300/11608 [in Ukrainian].

Tishchenko, V. V. (2020). Kryminalistychne rozpiznavannia v rozsliduvanni zlochy­niv [Forensic recognition in crime investigation]. Tradytsii ta novatsii yurydychnoi nauky: mynule, suchasnist, maibutnie : mat-ly Mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konf. (Odesa, 15.05.2020). U 3 t. T. 3. Odesa. URL: https://hdl.handle.net/11300/13329 [in Ukrainian].

Tishchenko, V. V., Bielik, L. S. (2019). Kryminalni ta kryminalistychni fiktsii yak formy dezinformuvannia u rozsliduvanni zlochyniv [Criminal and forensic fictions as forms of disinformation in crime investigation]. Pravove zhyttia suchasnoi Ukrainy : mat-ly Mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konf. (Odesa, 17.05.2019). U 2 t. T. 2. Odesa. URL: https://hdl.handle.net/11300/21513 [in Ukrainian].

Ukraina — 116-ta z-pomizh 180 krain v Indeksi spryiniattia koruptsii (2023) [Ukraine is 116th out of 180 countries in the Corruption Perception Index] / Detektor media [Elektronnyi resurs]. 07.02.2023. URL: https://cs.detector.media/reforms/texts/185173/2023-02-07-ukraina-116-ta-z-pomizh-180-krain-v-indeksi-spryynyattya-koruptsii/ [in Ukrainian].

Zhuravel, V. A. (2018). Alhorytmy v krymina­listytsi [Algorithms in Criminalistics] / Velyka ukrainska yurydychna entsyklo­pediia : u 20 t. T. 20 : Kryminalistyka, sudova ekspertyza, yurydychna psykholohiia // redkol.: V. Yu. Shepitko ta in. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].

Zhuravel, V. A. (2018). Zlochyny koruptsiinoi spriamovanosti [Algorithms in Criminalistics] / Velyka ukrainska yurydychna entsyklopediia [Corruption-related crimes] : u 20 t. T. 20 : Kryminalistyka, sudova ekspertyza, yurydychna psykholohiia // redkol.: V. Yu. Shepitko ta in. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].

Zhuravel, V. A. (2020). Obiekt piznannia kryminalistyky [The object of cognition in forensic science]. Pytannia borotby zi zlochynnistiu. Vyp. 39. DOI: 10.31359/2079-6242-2020-39-12 [in Ukrainian].

Zhuravel, V. A., Shepitko, V. Yu. (2021). Rozvytok kryminalistyky ta sudovoi ekspertyzy

v Ukraini: nablyzhennia do yedynoho yevro­peiskoho prostoru [Development of Criminalistics and Forensic Examination in Ukraine: Approximation to the Common European Space] / Pravova nauka Ukrainy: suchasnyi stan, vyklyky ta perspektyvy rozvytku : monohrafiia. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].

Published

2023-12-31

How to Cite

Bielik, L., & Cheremnova, A. (2023). Forensic Disinformation as a Tactical and Forensic Means of Detecting and Solving Corruption Criminal Offenses. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science and Criminalistics, 33(4), 12–22. https://doi.org/10.32353/khrife.4.2023.02