Forensic Science and Forensic Expert Activity: a View Through the Prism of Forensic Experts’ Opinions

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32353/khrife.1.2023.02

Keywords:

forensic examination; forensic expert activity; optimization of forensic expert activity; international cooperation in forensic science field; forensic expert practice; forensic report; forensic expert.

Abstract

The primary concerns of this paper are to study the phenomenon of forensic science and determine ways of optimizing forensic expert practice in Ukraine by summarizing opinions of forensic experts. Based on the survey conducted among forensic experts, issues of legal regulation of forensic science have been considered; the need to unify provisions governing conduct of forensic examination is justified; means of carrying out forensic expert activities (methods, methodologies, technologies) have been analyzed. Positions of forensic experts on certain procedural and substantive issues concerning appointment and conduct of forensic examinations have been determined. The role of the forensic expert’s automated workstation and electronic registers in forensic expert practice (the Register of Certified Forensic Experts and the Register of Methodologies of Forensic Examinations) is argued. The author underlines possibilities of improving the quality of forensic examination and outlines modern trends of international cooperation in the field of forensic science. The importance of cooperation between forensic science institutions of Ukraine within the European Network of Forensic Science Institutes is stressed. The Article Purpose is conditoned by the need to outline directions for forensic science development in Ukraine in current conditions and optimize forensic expert activity, as well as to determine ways to improve expert practice by summarizing forensic experts’ opinions. General scientific and special research methods have been used.

References

Avdieieva, H. K. (2018). Znannia spetsialni [Specific expertise] / Velyka ukrainska yurydychna entsyklopediia : u 20 t. T. 20: Kryminalistyka, sudova ekspertyza, yurydychna psykholohiia / redkol.: V. Yu. Shepitko (holova) ta in. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].

Avdieieva, H. K., Shepitko, V. Yu. (2018). Ekspertyza sudova [Forensic science] / Velyka ukrainska yurydychna entsyklopediia : u 20 t. T. 20: Kryminalistyka, sudova ekspertyza, yurydychna psykholohiia / redkol.: V. Yu. Shepitko (holova) ta in. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].

Kamynskyi, M. K. (2011). Spetsyalnie znanyia — syla? [Specific expertise: power?] Kryminalist pershodrukovanyi. № 3 [in Ukrainian].

Kliuiev, O., Simakova-Yefremian, E. (2021). Doktrynalni pidkhody do sudovoi ekspertyzy v Ukraini [Doctrinal approaches to forensic science in Ukraine]. Pravo Ukrainy. DOI: 10.33498/louu-2021-08-028 [in Ukrainian].

Klymenko, N. I., Kupriievych, O. A. (2015). Mizhnarodne spivrobitnytstvo sudovo-ekspertnykh ustanov [International cooperation of forensic expert institutions]. Visnyk kryminalnoho sudochynstva. № 4. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/vkc_2015_4_19 [in Ukrainian].

Lopata, O. (2016). Zmist, zavdannia ta formy mizhnarodnoho spivrobitnytstva u sferi sudovo-ekspertnoi diialnosti [Content, tasks and forms of international cooperation in the field of forensic science]. Visegrad Journal on Human Rights. Aug. [in Ukrainian].

Shepitko, V. Yu. (2014). Problemy vykorystannia spetsialnykh znan kriz pryzmu suchasnoho kryminalnoho sudochynstva v Ukraini [Problems of using specific expertise through the prism of modern criminal justice in Ukraine]. Sudova ekspertyza. № 1 [in Ukrainian].

Shepitko, V. Yu. (2022). Formuvannia doktryny kryminalistyky ta sudovoi ekspertyzy v Ukraini — shliakh do yedynoho yevro-peiskoho kryminalistychnoho prostoru [Formation of the doctrine of criminalistics and forensic science in Ukraine is the way to a unified European forensic space]. Pravo Ukrainy. № 2 [in Ukrainian].

Shepitko, M. V., Shepitko, V. Yu. (2018). Dopyt eksperta v sudi [Interrogation of the expert in court] / Velyka ukrainska yurydychna entsyklopediia : u 20 t. T. 20: Kryminalistyka, sudova ekspertyza, yurydychna psykho-lohiia / redkol.: V. Yu. Shepitko (holova) ta in. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].

Shepitko, V., Shepitko, M. (2021). Doktryna kryminalistyky ta sudovoi ekspertyzy: formuvannia, suchasnyi stan i rozvytok v Ukraini [Doctrine of criminalistics and forensic examination: formation, current state and development in Ukraine]. Pravo Ukrainy. № 8. DOI: 10.33498/louu-2021-08-012 [in Ukrainian].

Shepitko, V., Shepitko, M. (2021). Kryminalne pravo, kryminalistyka ta sudovi nauky [Crim-inal law, criminalistics and forensic scienc-es]: entsyklopediia. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].

Zakovyrko, O. M. (2018). Yevropeiska merezha sudovo-ekspertnykh ustanov (ENFSI): istoriia stvorennia ta perspektyvy rozvytku [The European Network of Forensic Science Institutes (ENFSI): history of creation and prospects for development]. Aktualni pytannia standartyzatsii sudovo-ekspertnoho zabezpechennia pravosuddia v Ukraini. Perspektyvy rozvytku : mat-ly mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konf., prysviach. 105-rich. sudov. ekspert. v Ukr. ta 95-rich. z dnia narodzh. akad. M. Ya. Sehaia (Kyiv, 04—05.07.2018). Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Zhuravel, V. A., Shepitko, V. Yu. (2021). Rozvytok kryminalistyky ta sudovoi ekspertyzy v Ukraini: nablyzhennia do yedynoho yevropeiskoho prostoru [Development of criminalistics and forensic science in Ukraine: approaching a unified European space] / Pravova nauka Ukrainy: suchasnyi stan, vyklyky ta perspektyvy rozvytku : monohrafiia. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].

Published

2023-03-31

How to Cite

Shepitko, V. (2023). Forensic Science and Forensic Expert Activity: a View Through the Prism of Forensic Experts’ Opinions. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science and Criminalistics, 30(1), 12–22. https://doi.org/10.32353/khrife.1.2023.02