General System of Forensic Engineering Tasks

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32353/khrife.4.2022.05

Keywords:

forensic science, research topic and object, tasks of forensic examination; expertology; species, subspecies of forensic science; forensic engineering; engineering and technological examination.

Abstract

Active development of forensic sciences in recent years (in accordance with the laws and principles of the genesis of forensic expertise) growing demand for their conduct and the urgent need for the emergence of new types of research make it necessary to systematize general tasks of forensic science in general and engineering in particular. This article purpose: to conduct an analysis of tasks solved by performing engineering and technical types of forensic science; determine the general principles of their formation; organize (unify) these tasks into a general (generic) system; to form a theoretical basis for improving the list of issues to be resolved while forensic engineering and technical researches (with the aim of modernizing Chapter II “Research guidelines concerning preparation and appointment of forensic examinations and researches”, that should be made the basic for new species(subspecies) of forensic engineering. In order to achieve the goal, methods of scientific knowledge were used: observation, comparison, abstraction, analysis, synthesis, modeling, etc. It is proposed to differentiate the tasks of engineering and technical research according to four groups that define the system as general (generic): 1) research of the state of objects; 2) establishment of conformity / non-conformity of the state of the object with certain requirements; 3) mechanism determination of investigated situation occurrence ; 4) clarification of cause-and-effect relationships in the situation under research.

References

Bilenchuk, P. D. (2012). Zasoby piznannia u sferi

kryminalnoho sudochynstva: naukovi zasady systematyzatsii ta osoblyvosti vykorystannia [Means of cognition in the field of criminal justice: scientific principles of systematization and features of use]. Kn. 1. Zahalnoteoretychna kharakterystyka zasobiv piznannia u sferi kryminalnoho sudochynstva: problemy metodolohii, systemolohii, prakseolohii : monohrafiia. Khmelnytskyi [in Ukrainian].

Holovchenko, L. M., Lozovyi, A. I., Simakova-Yefremian, E. B. ta in. (2016). Osnovy sudovoi ekspertyzy: navchalnyi posibnyk dlia fakhivtsiv, yaki maiut namir otrymaty abo pidtverdyty kvalifikatsiiu sudovoho eksperta [Forensic science essentials: manual for professionals intended to obtain or confirm forensic expert professional skills]. Kharkiv. URL: https://expertize-journal. org.ua/attachments/article/924/ose.pdf [in Ukrainian].

Honcharuk, H. M. (2021). Zaprovadzhennia ta stanovlennia sudovoi ekspertyzy bezpilotnykh litalnykh aparativ [Introduction and formation of forensic examination of unmanned aerial vehicles]. Vcheni zapysky TNU imeni V. I. Vernadskoho. Seriia: yurydychni nauky. T. 32 (71). № 2. DOI: 10.32838/TNU-2707-0581/2021.2/012 [in Ukrainian].

Klymenko, N. I. (2019). Poniattia ta zavdannia zahalnoi teorii sudovoi ekspertolohii v systemi yurydychnykh nauk [Theory of forensic expertology in the system of law]. Kryminalistyka i sudova ekspertyza. Vyp. 64. DOI: 10.33994/kndise.2019.64.02 [in Ukrainian].

Krupka, A., Duz, L., Kraliuk, M., Yakovlieva Ye. (2020). Judicial engineering and mechanical examination: practiceological approach [Judicial engineering and mechanical examination: practiceological approach]. National Technical University of Ukraine Journal. Political science. Sociology. Law. No. 3 (47). DOI: 10.20535/2308-5053.2020.3(47).229484.

Prokhorov-Lukin, G. V. (1993). Teoreticheskie i metodicheskie osnovy sudebno-ehkspertnoi situalogii [Theoretical and methodological foundations of forensic situationology] : dis. … kand. iurid. nauk. Kiev [in Russian].

Segai, M. Ia. (2003). Sudebnaia ehkspertologiia: obieekt, predmet, priroda i sistema nauki [Forensic Expertology: Object, Subject, Nature and System of Science]. Teoriia ta praktyka sudovoi ekspertyzy i kryminalistyky. Vyp. 3. URL: http://revopravo.kiev.ua/ s1.html [in Russian].

Sehai, M. Ya. (2003). Sudova ekspertolohiia — nauka pro sudovo-ekspertnu diialnist [Forensic expertology is the science of forensic expert activity]. Visnyk Akademii pravovykh nauk Ukrainy. № 2—3 (33—34) [in Ukrainian].

Shcherbakovskii, M. G. (2005). Sudebnye ehkspertizy: naznachenie, proizvodstvo, ispolzovanie [Forensic examinations: appointment, production, use] : ucheb.-prakt. posob. Kharkov. URL: https:// l i b rar y. n lu .e du .u a / P OLN_T E XT/ UP/ SHERBAKOVSKIY_2005.pdf [in Russian].

Shcherbakovskii, M. G. (2019). O predmete sudebnoi ehkspertologii [About of forensic expertology topic]. Aktualni pytannia sudovoi ekspertyzy i kryminalistyky : mat-ly Mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konf., prysviach. 150-rich. z dnia narodzh. Zasl. prof. M. S. Bokariusa (Kharkiv, 18—19.04.2019). Kharkiv. URL: http://dspace.univd.edu.ua/ xmlui/handle/123456789/9008 [in Russian].

Spasovich, V. D. (1895). Sochineniia [Writings]: v 10 t. Sankt-Peterburg, 1889—1902. T. 5 [in Russian].

Published

2023-04-18

How to Cite

Bohdaniuk, I. (2023). General System of Forensic Engineering Tasks. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science and Criminalistics, 29(4), 110–123. https://doi.org/10.32353/khrife.4.2022.05