CONTENT AND SYSTEM OF FORENSIC LAW SOURCES: THE GENERAL PART
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32353/khrife.1.2020_10Keywords:
forensic relations, source system, general part, forensic law, norms of law, forensic activities.Abstract
The problem of studying forensic law sources, as an element of the national legal system, is becoming urgent today. By studying their systemic properties, the possibility of scientific forecasting in the development of the legal system tendency, determining courses of the most effective steps to improve the entire mechanism of legal regulation of forensic relations’ complex is increasing.
The article purpose is to conduct research on the prerequisites for systematizing the modern array of the forensic science legal basis in Ukraine and to identify theoretical and applied peculiarities for the formation of the general part content in the system of forensic law sources.
To uncover the problem and subject of examination, as well as to accomplish the tasks, the synthesis method was used, which helped to identify the main areas of legal regulation and the system of general forensic relations, the formal legal method helped to clarify the content of forensic legislation legal norms.
Attention is drawn to the fact that the legal construction of the general part of the current Law on judicial examination from the point of view of legal technique in general and rule-making in particular is an example of legislative anachronism in which neither substantive nor formal requirements of the culture of law-making are properly observed, what directly complicates its implementation, compliance and application.
The need for injunctions of a general nature is emphasized with the purpose for a better understanding of the essence, objectives and content of specific injunctions. In general provisions of the basic act of forensic legislation it is offered to combine injunctions that define: the concept, terminology, content, legal basis, objectives, principles of forensic activity and their content, subject and object composition of forensic examination, as well as the powers of state, interdepartmental, departmental and public bodies on state regulation and forensic management.
It has been established that the content of most sources of forensic law testifies to the differentiation of their injunctions, which can be carried out in a special part according to three generic criteria: the type of forensic activity entity (based on departmental subordination, form of ownership); type of forensic examination; type of legal proceedings.
Arguments on the lack of a single scientifically based system of interconnected regulatory legal acts of forensic legislation are presented, which, as a result, created the social prerequisites for its systematization in the form of codification. The course of the highest degree of legislation perfection is substantiated, which should be presented in the form of Forensic Code of Ukraine.
References
Diialnist naukovoi ta redaktsiino-vydavnychoi rad DNDEKTs MVS Ukrainy. URL: https:// dndekc.mvs.gov.ua/ (data zvernennia 06.06.2020) [in Ukrainian].
Harashchuk, V. (2001). Upravlinski posluhy-novyi instytut chy nova pomylka? Kharkiv:
Pravo [in Ukrainian].
Holovchenko, L. M. (2013). Pro neobkhidnist vdoskonalennia zakonodavstva pro sudo-vo-ekspertnu diialnist v Ukraini. Kriminalistika i sudebnaia ekspertiza. Vyp. (1). URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/krise_2013_58%281%29__3 (data zvernennia: 06.06.2020) [in Ukrainian].
Ishchenko, A. V. (2019). Kyivskyi naukovo-doslidnyi instytut sudovykh ekspertyz: pohliad cherez pryzmu istorii. Kryminalistyka i sudova ekspertyza. Vyp. 64 [in Ukrainian].
Klymenko, N. I. (2007). Sudova ekspertolohiia. Kurs lektsii. Kyiv: In Yure [in Ukrainian]. Klymenko, N. I. (2013) Zakriplennia u KPK Ukrainy pryntsypu zmahalnosti y nezalezh-nosti sudovykh ekspertiv. Yurydychnyi chasopys Natsionalnoi akademii vnutrish-
nikh sprav. № 1 [in Ukrainian].
Lozovyi, A. I. (2014) Aktualni pytannia reformuvannia zakonodavstva u sferi sudovo-ek-spertnoi diialnosti v Ukraini. Teoriia ta praktyka sudovoi ekspertyzy i kryminal-istyky. Vyp. 14 [in Ukrainian].
Pro nevidkladni zakhody z provedennia reform ta zmitsnennia derzhavy: Ukaz Prezyden-ta Ukrainy vid 8 lystopada 2019 r. № 837/2019. Ofitsiinyi visnyk Prezydenta Ukrainy vid 19.11.2019. № 24, stor. 29, st. 1038 [in Ukrainian].
Pro sudovu ekspertyzu: Zakon Ukrainy vid 25 liutoho 1994 r. № 4038-XII. URL: https:// zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4038-12?find=1&text (data zvernennia 06.06.2020) [in Ukrainian].
Pro zatverdzhennia perelikiv rekomendovanoi naukovo-tekhnichnoi ta dovidkovoi liter-atury, shcho vykorystovuietsia pid chas provedennia sudovykh ekspertyz: nakaz Ministerstva yustytsii Ukrainy 30.07.2010 № 1722/5. URL: https://zakon.rada. gov.ua/laws/show/v1722323-10 (data zvernennia 08.06.2020) [in Ukrainian].
Pro zatverdzhennia Polozhennia pro Koordynatsiinu radu z problem sudovoi ekspertyzy pry Ministerstvi yustytsii Ukrainy: postanova Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrainy vid 16 lystopada 1994 r. № 778 (u redaktsii postanovy Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrainy vid 23 travnia 2007 r. № 770). URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/778-94-%D0%BF (data zvernennia 06.06.2020) [in Ukrainian].
Pro zatverdzhennia Polozhennia pro Ministerstvo vnutrishnikh sprav Ukrainy: posta-nova Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrainy vid 28 zhovtnia 2015 r. № 878. URL: https:// zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/878-2015-%D0%BF?find=1&text (data zvernennia 06.06.2020) [in Ukrainian].
Pro zatverdzhennia Polozhennia pro Ministerstvo yustytsii Ukrainy: postanova Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrainy vid 2 lypnia 2014 r. № 228 URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/ laws/show/228-2014-%D0%BF?find=1&text (data zvernennia 06.06.2020) [in Ukrainian].
Pro zatverdzhennia Polozhennia pro naukovo-konsultatyvnu ta metodychnu radu z prob-lem sudovoi ekspertyzy pry Ministerstvi yustytsii Ukrainy: nakaz Ministerstva yustytsii Ukrainy vid 27.03.2012 № 470/5. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/ show/z0460-12#n16 (data zvernennia 06.06.2020) [in Ukrainian].
Pro zatverdzhennia Poriadku atestatsii ta derzhavnoi reiestratsii metodyk provedennia sudovykh ekspertyz: postanova Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrainy vid 2 lypnia 2008 r.
№ 595. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/595-2008-%D0%BF (data zvernennia 08.06.2020) [in Ukrainian].
Pro zatverdzhennia Poriadku formuvannia Pereliku naukovykh fakhovykh vydan Ukrainy: nakaz Ministerstva osvity i nauky Ukrainy vid 15.01.2018 № 32. Ofitsiinyi visnyk Ukrainy vid 13.03.2018. № 20, stor. 155, st. 677 [in Ukrainian].
Pro zatverdzhennia Poriadku vedennia derzhavnoho Reiestru atestovanykh sudovykh ekspertiv: nakaz Ministerstva yustytsii Ukrainy vid 29.03.2012 № 492/5. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0484-12 (data zvernennia 08.06.2020) [in Ukrainian].
Pro zatverdzhennia Poriadku vedennia Reiestru metodyk provedennia sudovykh eks pertyz: nakaz Ministerstva yustytsii Ukrainy vid 02.10.2008 № 1666/5. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0924-08 (data zvernennia 08.06.2020) [in Ukrainian]
Pyrih, I.V. (2016). Pryntsypy sudovo-ekspertnoi diialnosti ta yikh spivvidnoshennia z pryntsypamy sudovoi ekspertolohii. Pravova pozytsiia. № 1 [in Ukrainian].
Reiestr naukovykh fakhovykh vydan Ukrainy. URL: http://nfv.ukrintei.ua/ (data zvernen-nia 06.06.2020) [in Ukrainian]
Saltevskyi, M. V. (2005). Kryminalistyka (u suchasnomu vyhliadi): pidruch. Kyiv: Kon-dor [in Ukrainian].
Sehai, M. Ya. (1970). Metodolohiia sudovoi identyfikatsii. Kyiv: RYO MVD USSR [in Ukrainian].
Sudovo-ekspertne pravo. (2019). Khrestomatiia u 4 t. systematyzov. zb. norm.-prav. aktiv. M-vo vnutr. sprav Ukrainy, Dnipr. nauk.-dosl. Ekspert.-kryminal. tsentr; R.S. Ki-rina ta V.M. Korotaieva (Eds). Dnipro: Zhurfond [in Ukrainian].
Zahalna teoriia derzhavy i prava. (2011). Pidruch. dlia stud. yuryd. spets. vyshch. navch. Zakl. M. V. Tsvika, O. V. Petryshyna (Eds). Nats. yuryd. akad. Ukrainy im. Yaro-slava Mudroho. Kharkiv: Pravo [in Ukrainian].
