CORRELATION AND STRUCTURE OF A FORENSIC TECHNIQUE AND FORENSIC SCIENCE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32353/khrife.1.2020_09Keywords:
criminalistics, forensic technique, forensic science, relationship and difference between forensic technique and forensic science, structure of sciences, legal applied sciences.Abstract
A historical analysis of forensic techniques and forensic science emergence as scientific branches is outlined, their interconnection, differences are considered, the subject, object and structure are clarified. It is shown that criminalistics and forensic science are both separate and kindred scientific branches that have common historical roots. The author proves that the development and gradual separation of forensic science from criminalistics did not change the scientific, methodological, didactic foundations and structure of a forensic technique as a component of criminalistics.
The structure of forensic technique and forensic science is suggested. The author presents the forensic technique modern structure in the form of the following sections: physical traces of crimes: types, classification, mechanism of formation; technical and forensic means and methods: classification, functional purpose; organizational and legal foundations of forensic support of offences investigation; means and methods of searching, recording, seizing, packaging and transporting traces of offenses; means and methods of preliminary investigation of offenses’ traces; information and reference support of offenses disclosure and investigation. Forensic science is represented in two parts: “General theory of forensic examination”, which includes theoretical provisions, doctrines inherent in all forensic fields, and “Methodological fundamentals of certain types of forensic examinations”, which are the theoretical basis of certain forensic branches and are used for the development of methods for solving typical forensic tasks.
The close connection and mutual influence of two scientific branches and types of activity are noted. The connection is manifested in the unity of theoretical foundations, methodological approaches to the study of objects and, partially, in the use of technical means. The development of new forensic methods affects the advancement and improvement of technical and forensic means of collecting physical traces of a crime. On the contrary, the emergence of new types of crime traces necessitates the creation of appropriate typical forensic research methods.
References
Averianova, T. V. (2017). Problemy teorii i praktiki sudebnoy ekspertizy. Diskussionnyye voprosy teorii i praktiki sudebnoy ekspertizy: mater. ІІ mezhd. nauchn.-prakt. konf. (Moscow, 28-27 oktiabria 2017) [in Russian].
Belkin, R. S. (1969). Kriminalistika i dokazyvanie (metodologicheskie problemy). Moscow: Iuridicheskaia literatura [in Russian].
Belkin, R. S. (1999). Istoriya otechestvennoy kriminalistiki. Moscow: NORMA [in Russian].
Crispino, F., Ribaux, O., Houck, M., Margot, P. (2011). Forensic science — а true science? Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, V. 43. № 2.
Entsiklopediya epistemologii i filosofii nauki (2009). Moscow: «Kanon”1”» ROOI «Reabilitatsiya» [in Russian].
Gross, G. (2002). Predisloviye k 3-yemu izdaniyu. Rukovodstvo dlya sudebnykh sledovateley kak sistema kriminalistiki. Novoye izd., perepech. s izd. 1908 g. Moscow: LeksEst [in Russian].
Gross, H: (1899). Handbuch für Untersuchungsrichter als System der Kriminalistik. Graz, Leuschner & Lubensky
Honcharenko, V. H. (2009). Kryterii virohidnosti vysnovkiv eksperta: hnoseolohichnyi, psykholohichnyi i protsesualnyi aspekty. Chasopys Akademii advokatury Ukrainy. № 3. URL: http://www.irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/cgibin/irbis_nbuv/cgiirbis_64.exe [in Ukrainian].
Iablokov, N. P. (2009). Kriminalistika: priroda, sistema, metodologicheskie osnovy/N. P. Iablokov, A. Iu. Golovin. Moscow: Norma [in Russian].
Jay, A. Siegel (2020). Forensic science. Encyclopaedia Britannica. URL: https: //www. britannica.com/science/forensic-science.
Klymenko N. I. Poniattia ta zavdannia zahalnoi teorii sudovoi ekspertolohii v systemi yurydychnykh nauk. Kryminalistyka i sudova ekspertyza. Kyiv: Lira-K, Vyp. 64. [in Ukrainian].
Klymenko, N. I. (2007). Sudova ekspertolohiia. Kyiv: In Yure [in Ukrainian].
Koldina, V. YA. Kriminalistika sotsialisticheskikh stran (1986). Moscow: Yuridicheskaya literatura [in Russian].
Kryminalistyka: pidruchnyk (2015). V. V. Piaskovskyi, YU. M. Chornous, A. V. Ishchenko, O. O. Alyeksyeyev ta in. Kyiv: «Tsentr uchbovoyi literatury» [in Ukrainian].
Kryminalistyka: pidruchnyk (2019).: u 2 t. T. 1. V. YU. Shepitka (Ed). Kharkiv: Pravo [in Ukrainian].
Locard, E. (1920). L’enquête criminelle et les méthodes scientifiques. Paris, Paris Éditeur Ernest Flammarion.
Locard, E. (1923). Manuel de technique policière (enquete criminelle). Paris: Payot.
Lokar, E. (1941). Rukovodstvo po kriminalistike. S. P. Mitricheva (Ed). Moscow: Yuridicheskoye izdatelstvo NKYU SSSR [in Russian].
Mailis, N. P. (2013). O sootnoshenii sudebnoi ekspertizy, kriminalistiki i operativno-rozysknoi deiatelnosti. Izvestiia Tulskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta.
Ekonomicheskie i iuridicheskie nauki. Vyp. 4. Ch. 2. [in Russian].
Maras, M.-H., Mirand, M. D. (2014). Forensic Science. Encyclopedia of Law and Economics. Springer. Science+Business Media. New York.
Matusovskii, G. A. (1962). Kriminalisticheskaia tekhnika, ee predmet i zadachi. Voprosy ugolovnogo prava, ugolovnogo protcessa i kriminalistiki. Uchenye zapiski Kharkovskogo iuridicheskogo instituta. Kharkov, Vyp. 16 [in Russian].
Pyrih, I. V. (2015). Teoretyko-prykladni problemy ekspertnoho zabezpechennia dosudovoho rozsliduvannia: monohrafiia. Dnipropetrovsk: Dniprop. derzh. un-t vnutr. sprav; Lira LTD. [in Ukrainian].
Reiss, R. A. (2015). Nauchnaia tekhnika rassledovaniia prestuplenii. Sankt-Peterburg, Senatskaia tipografiia, 1912 [in Russian].
Rossinskaia, E. R. (2007). Obshchaia teoriia sudebnoi ekspertizy i kriminalistika kak samostoiatelnye rodstvennye nauki. Sledovatel. Moscow: Iurist. № 10 (114). [in Russian].
Roux, C. P., Crispino, F., Ribaux, O. (2012). From Forensics to Forensic Science. Current issues in criminal justice. July Vol. 24. № 1.
Shcherbakovskyi, M. H. (2015). Provedennia ta vykorystannia sudovykh ekspertyz u kryminalnomu provadzhenni: monohrafiia. Kharkiv: V dele [in Ukrainian].
Shershavin, S. V. (1968). Istoriia otechestvennoi sudebno-meditcinskoi sluzhby. Moscow. Meditcina [in Russian].
Shliakhov, A. R. (1959). Predmet, metod i sistema sovetskoi nauki kriminalisticheskoi ekspertizy. Voprosy sudebnoi ekspertizy i kriminalistiki, Alma-Ata [in Russian].
Simakova-Yefremian E. B. (2004). Teoriia i metodolohiia kompleksnoi ekspertyzy kontaktno-slidovoi vzaiemodii obiektiv: monohr. Kharkiv: VKF «Hryf» [in Ukrainian].
Stepaniuk, R. L., Perlin, S. I. (2019). Napriamy rozvytku struktury i zmistu kryminalistychnoi tekhniky v Ukraini. Visnyk kryminalistyky. Kyiv: DNDEKTs MVS Ukrainy [in Ukrainian].
Sudebno-ekspertnaia deiatelnost: pravovoe, teoreticheskoe i organizatcionnoe obespechenie: uchebnik. E. R. Rossinskoi, E. I. Galiashinoi (Eds). (2017). Moscow: Norma: INFRA-M Moscow [in Russian].
Tregubov, S. N. (1915). Osnovy ugolovnoi tekhniki: nauchno-tekhnicheskie priemy rassledovaniia prestuplenii. Petrograd: Pravo [in Russian].
Variesh, G.V., Kolmakov, V.P. (1972). Razvitie kriminalistiki v GDR. Kriminalistika i sudebnaia ekspertiza. Kyiv: RIO MVD USSR. Vyp. 9. [in Russian].
Veingart, A. (1912) Ugolovnaia taktika: rukovodstvo k rassledovaniiu prestuplenii. Sankt-Peterburg: Vestnik politcii [in Russian].
Vinberg, A. I., Malakhovskaia, N. T. (1979). Sudebnaia ekspertologiia (obshcheteoreticheskie i metodologicheskie problemy sudebnykh ekspertiz): posobie. Volgograd: VSSh MVD SSSR [in Russian].
Vinberg, A., Malakhovskaya, N. (1973). Sudebnaia ekspertologiia – novaia otrasl nauki. Sotcialisticheskaia zakonnost. № 11 [in Russian].
Volynskii, A. F. (2013). Sudebno-ekspertnaia i kriminalisticheskaia vidy deiatelnosti: obshchee i osobennoe. Ekspert-kriminalist. № 2 [in Russian].
Vydria, M. M., Liubarskii M. G. (1959). Mesto kriminalistiki v sisteme iuridicheskikh nauk. Voprosy sovetskoi kriminalistiki. Kazakhskii gosudarstvennyi universitet, Alma-Ata [in Russian].
Yusupov, V. V. (2018). Kryminalistyka v Ukraini u ХХ–ХХІ stolittiakh: monohrafiia. FOP Maslakov [in Ukrainian].
