OBJECT, SUBJECT AND TASKS OF JUDICIAL ENGINEERING AND TECHNICAL EXAMINATION OF ACCIDENTS RELATED TO ELECTRIC INJURY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32353/khrife.1.2019.28Keywords:
forensic engineering and technical examination, electrical examination, examination in the field of labor protection and safety of life, accidents involving electrical intrusion, subject, tasks, object of expertise.Abstract
Ensuring the high quality, completeness and correctness of the expert's conclusions based on the results of the investigation of accidents involving electrical intrusion, in the diversity of the actual circumstances of the occurrence of the event, in the huge range of electrical appliances and a large number of technical regulations in their application is impossible without a clear definition and understanding by the expert of the fundamental Fundamentals of expert science, which primarily concern the object, subject and task of examination.
The need for their detailed consideration is conditioned by the complex nature of the knowledge used in this area: in the field of electrical engineering and in the field of labor protection and safety of life.
The analysis of the scientific literature and the developments of scientists in this field is associated with insufficient development of issues of a clear and comprehensive definition of the terms “subject” and “object” of judicial complex expert examinations, in particular, examination of cases of electrical injuries. The author summarizes the various results of theoretical research and, taking into account expert practice, conducting an examination, offers to determine the subject and object of forensic engineering examination related to electrical injury.
Considering the typical tasks of a forensic examination, attention is drawn to the growing tendency of setting a specific task regarding the prediction of the occurrence of a certain negative event to resolve. The necessity is grounded and it is proposed to supplement the classification of expert tasks in the engineering and technical investigations of cases of electrical intrusion with a new kind - prognostic problems.
References
Arotsker, L. E. (1966). Sushchnost' kriminalisticheskoy ekspertizy. Kriminalist. ekspertiza. Moskva: VSh MOOP RSFSR, Vyp. 1 [in Russian].
Aver'yanova, T. V. (1991). Soderzhanie i kharakteristika metodov sudebno-ekspertnykh issledovaniy. Kaz. NIISE [in Russian].
Belkin, R. S. (1991). Kurs kriminalistiki: v 3 t. Moskva: Yurist T. 2 [in Russian]. Belkin, R. S., Vinberg, A. I. (1973). Kriminalistika. Obshcheteoreticheskie problemy Moskva: Yurid. lit [in Russian].
Cryminalnyi kodeks Ukrainy. URL : https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2341-14 (data zvernennia 19.05.2019) [in Ukrainian].
Cryminalnyi protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy. URL : http://search.ligazakon.ua/ l_doc2.nsf/link1/T124651.html (data zvernennia 27.05.2019) [in Ukrainian].
Dovidnyk zdobuvacha Naukovoho stupenia (2000). Zbirnyk Normatyvnykh dokumentiv ta informatsiinykh materialiv z pytan atestatsii Naukovykh kadriv vyshchoi kvalifikatsii. Uporiadnyk Yu.I.Tsekov; perednie slovo R.V.Boika. Kyiv: Redaktsiia «Biuletenia Vyshchoi atestatsiinoi komisii Ukrainy». [in Ukrainian]. Filosofskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar' / red. kol. S. S. Averintseva i dr. 2-e izd. Moskva: Sov. entsikl., 1989 [in Russian].
Honcharenko, V. H. (2003). Metodolohichni problemy vchennia pro predmet kryminalistyky. Aktualni problemy kryminalistyky: materialy mizhnar. nauk.- prakt. konf. (Kharkiv, 25-26 veres. 2003 r.) Kharkiv: Hryf [in Ukrainian].
Mieshkov, O. O. (2019). Problemy Nauchnogo obespecheniya provedeniya inzhenerno-tekhnicheskoy ekspertizy vo vremya rassledovaniya Neschastnykh sluchayev, svyazannykh s elektrotravmirovaniyem. LEGEA ŞI VIAŢA. № 2/2. 89-94 [in Russian].
Mirskiy, D. Ya., Rostov, M. N. (1984). Ponyatie ob»ekta sudebnoy ekspertizy. Aktual. problemy teorii sudeb. ekspertizy. Moskva: VNIISE. Vyp. 44 [in Russian].
Osnovy sudovoii ekspertyzy : Navchalnyi posibnyk dlia fakhivtsiv, yaki maiut Namirotrymaty abo pidtverdyty kvalifikatsiu sudovogo eksperta. Avt.-uklad. L. M. Golovchenko, A. I. Lozovyi, E. B. Simakova-Yefremian.Pravo, 2016 [in Ukrainian].
Pro sudovu ekspertyzu: Zakon Ukrainy. URL : https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/ laws/show/4038-12 (data zvernennia 22.05.2019) [in Ukrainian].
Rossinskaya, E. R. (2016). Sudebnaya ekspertologiya: genezis, predmet, sistema, funktsii, tendentsii razvitiya. Criminalistics and Forensic Expertology: science, studies, practice. Vilnius; Varšuva [in Russian].
Sehai, M. Ya. (2003). Sudebnaia эkspertolohyia: obъekt, predmet, pryroda y systema Nauky. Teoriia ta praktyka sudovoi ekspertyzy i kryminalistyky. Kharkiv: Pravo. Vyp. 3 [in Russian].
Shepitko, V. Yu. (2003). Tendentsii i perspektyvy rozvytku kryminalistyky (kontseptualnist pidkhodiv i dyskusiinist pohliadiv). Aktualni problemy kryminalistyky: materialy mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konf. (Kharkiv, 25-26 veres. 2003 r.) Kharkiv: Hryf [in Ukrainian].
Shliahov, A. R. (1975). O predmete sudebnoy ekspertizy.Nekotoryye voprosy teorii sudebnoy ekspertizy : tezisy Nauch. soobshch. Na 7 teor. seminare — kryminalisticheskih chteniah 26 iulia 1975 hoda. Moskva: VNIISE [in Russian].
Simakova-Yefremian, E. B. (2019). Teoretyko-pravovi ta metodologichni zasady kompleksnykh sudovo-ekspertnykh doslidzhen: dys. Na zdobuttia Naukovogo stupennia doktora urydychnykh Nauk za spetsialnistiu 12.00.09. URL : http://nauka.nlu.edu.ua/download/diss/ Simakova/d_Simakova.pdf — (data zvernennia 10.04.2019) [in Ukrainian].
Slovar' osnovnykh terminov sudebnykh ekspertiz. Moskva: VNIISE, 1980 [in Russian].
Yolon, P. (2002). Piznannia. Filosofskyi entsyklopedychnyi slovnyk. V. I. Shynkaruk (holova redkolehii) ta in.; L. V. Ozadovska, N. P. Polishchuk (naukovi redaktory) Kyiv: Abrys [in Ukrainian].
