On Improvement of Scientific and Methodological Basis for Conducting Forensic Economic Examinations Considering Other Types of Forensic Examinations (review article)


Keywords: classification; forensic economic examination; set of forensic examinations; multidisciplinary forensic examination; research objects.

Abstract

Multidisciplinary forensic examinations reflect current tendency to integrate knowledge from various fields in order to objectively and impartially solve tasks of court proceedings, as integration of knowledge of specialists with different competences opens up new prospects for development of forensic examinations. Forensic economists who currently participate in multidisciplinary forensic examinations involving various kinds of interaction, sequence and degree of participation of each specialist in solving a common task have not been left behind. Article Purpose: to study into the need to develop scientific and methodological guidelines on the issues of carrying out forensic economic examinations while considering other types of forensic examinations. Leading methods of analysis and synthesis have been applied. The research paper substantiates the relevance of issues associated with conduct of forensic economic examinations taking account other types of forensic examinations. It is stressed that forensic economic examinations, during conduct of which results of other types of forensic examinations are used, do not fall under the concept of multidisciplinary forensic examination, since conclusions of other types of forensic examinations are not the research object of forensic economic examination. The paper emphasizes the need to develop an algorithm for conducting forensic economic examinations taking into account other types of forensic examinations. This will help forensic economists to use conclusions of other types of forensic examinations in multidisciplinary research without their evaluation, which in turn will enable to reduce the time for conducting forensic examinations and contribute to obtaining objective and unbiased expert conclusions.

References

Korukhov, Iu. G. (1985). Teoreticheskii, metodicheskii i protsessualnyi aspekty kompleksnykh ehkspertiz i kompleksnykh issledovanii [Theoretical, methodological and procedural aspects of multidisciplinary forensic examinations and multidisciplinary research]. Problemy organizatsii i provedeniia kompleksnykh ehkspertiz i ehkspertnykh issledovanii : mat-ly Vsesoiuz. nauch.-prakt. konf. Moskva [in Russian].
Lysenko, A. M. (2008). Ekonomichni doslidzhennia operatsii, poviazanykh z vykonanniam budivelnykh robit iz zaluchenniam biudzhetnykh koshtiv [Economic studies into operations associated with implementation of construction works using budgetary funds]. Teoriia ta praktyka sudovoi ekspertyzy i kryminalistyky. Kharkiv. Vyp. 8. URL: https://www.hniise.gov.ua/user_files/File/ files/2008.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Mailis, N. P. (2008). Ob aktualnosti ispolzovaniia kompleksa znanii v razlichnykh
napravleniiakh sudebnoi ehkspertizy [On the relevance of using a set of knowledge in various fields of forensic science]. Ehkspert-kriminalist. № 4 [in Russian].
Rudzevych, R. V. (2020). Peculiarities of multidisciplinary forensic structural engineering and economic examinations appointment. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science and Criminalistics. 22nd Is. DOI: 10.32353/khrife.2.2020.32.
Shebalkov, I. L., Panchuk, Yu. V., Huseinov, R. N., Suprun, V. S. (2020). Current problems of multidisciplinary forensic examinations while determination of the course of action of fire departments of the state emergency service of Ukraine. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science and Criminalistics. 22nd Is. DOI: 10.32353/khrife.2.2020.34.
Simakova-Yefremian, E. B. (2006). Sutnist subiekta intehratsii znan pry provedenni kompleksnykh sudovo-ekspertnykh doslidzhen [The essence of the subject of knowledge integration when conducting multidisciplinary forensic examination]. Teoriia ta praktyka sudovoi ekspertyzy i kryminalistyky. Kharkiv. Vyp. 6 [in Ukrainian].
Veretun, H. S. (2018). Osoblyvosti ta vidminnosti poniat «kompleksna ekspertyza» ta «kompleks ekspertyz» [Features and distinctions of concepts “complex expertise” and “expertise complex”]. Visnyk ONDISE. Vyp. 3. URL: http://ondise.od.ua/ DOC/vipusk3/osoblivostitavidminostiponya tkomplecexpertiza.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Zapototskyi, A. (2017). Osoblyvosti pryznachennia sudovykh ekspertyz pid chas ustanovlennia obstavyn, yaki maiut znachennia v protsesi rozsliduvannia zlochyniv u sferi budivnytstva [Peculiarities of appointing forensic examinations when establishing circumstances that are essential while investigation of crimes in the construction field]. Pidpryiemstvo, hospodarstvo i pravo. Vyp. 6. URL: http:// nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Pgip_2017_6_40 [in Ukrainian].

Abstract views: 67
PDF Downloads: 74
Published
2023-04-18
How to Cite
Kapustnik, K., Khomutenko, O., & Kipouras, P. (2023). On Improvement of Scientific and Methodological Basis for Conducting Forensic Economic Examinations Considering Other Types of Forensic Examinations (review article). Theory and Practice of Forensic Science and Criminalistics, 29(4), 160-169. https://doi.org/10.32353/khrife.4.2022.09