SPECIFICS OF PROFESSIONAL TRAINING OFEMPLOYEES EXPERT OFFICE OF THE MINISTRY OF INTERNAL AFFAIRS OF UKRAINE


Keywords: forensic expert, forensic expertise, forensic expert activity, expert office, professional training, forensic expertinstitutions, international practice.

Abstract

The peculiarities of professional training of experts of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine experts are considered.

The purpose of the article is to highlight the regularities of scientific and methodological training of experts and the qualitative performance of their duties. Forensic expert activity of state and non-state institutions in Ukraine and international practice in this field are analyzed. Judicial expertise in Ukraine is of great importance for the administration of justice. In order to increase the improve of this activity, it is necessary to create the conditions for ensuring a high level of professional training of experts. The expert office of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine is a system of state specialized institutions of forensic examination, which is constantly expanding the range of types of forensic examinations it conducts. The professional training of the experts of the aforementioned office is carried out through training in educational institutions, centers of vocational training of the Ministry of Internal Affairs personnel management and on the job training, as well as in the framework of additional professional training — internships, etc. At the same time, new types of expertise require scientific and methodological elaboration and, accordingly, provision of materials for further use during the examination. Changes in the field of forensic activity in the Republic of Belarus are analyzed, and the State Committee for Forensic Expertise of the Republic of Belarus established in 2013 is responsible for implementing a unified state policy in the field of 0forensic expertise. One of the main indicators of the effectiveness of expert activity is the implementation of science achievements in expert practice, using innovative technologies, distance learning opportunities, etc.

Proposed solutions and ways to more fully and objectively prepare an expert, which plays an important role and positively affects the efficiency and effectiveness during work, are offered.

References

Abramova, V. M. (2005). Ekspertni pomylky: sutnist, henezys, shliakhy podolannia: avtoreferat 12.00.09. Kryminalnyi protses ta kryminalistyka; sudova ekspertyza. Kyiv [n Ukrainian].
Anisimova, D. S. (2015). Vozmozhnosti distancionnogo obucheniya pri podgotovke sudebnyh ekspertov po programmam professional’noj perepodgotovki i povysheniya kvalifikacii. Aktual’nye problemy sudebno-ekspertnoj deyatel’nosti v ugolovnom, grazhdanskom, arbitrazhnom processe i po delam ob administrativnyh pravonarusheniyah: materialy IV mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii (g. Ufa, 1-2 oktyabrya 2015 g.). Ufa: RIC BashGU. 14-158 [in Russian].
Baraniak, V. M. (2014). Problemy pidhotovky sudovykh ekspertiv u vyshchykh navchalnykh zakladakh Ukrainy. Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu «Lvivska politekhnika». № 801: Yurydychni nauky. 229-233 [in Ukrainian].
Beliaev, M. V., Bushuev, V. V., Demin, K. E. (2014). Trasologiia i trasologicheskaia ekspertyza. Chastnaia metodyka prepodavaniia po spetsialnosti 031003. 65 Sudebnaia ekspertyza: uchebno-metodycheskoe posobie [in Russian].
Belkin R. S. (1997). Kriminalisticheskaіa enciklopediіa. Moskva: Megatron [in Russian].
Lapina I. A. (2018). Podhotovka sudebnykh ekspertov kak odna iz osnovnykh zadach gosudarstvennogo komiteta sudebnykh ekspertiz: zhurnal # 2(7) Sudebnaia ekspertiza Belarusi [in Russian].
Moroz, I. A. (2015). Organizaciya obucheniya sudebnyh ekspertov v gosudarstvennom uchrezhdenii obrazovaniya «institut povysheniya kvalifikacii i perepodgotovki kadrov gosudarstvennogo komiteta sudebnyh ekspertiz respubliki Belarus’ «Zhurnal «Sudebnaya ekspertiza Belarusi» 1/2015. 18-20 [in Russian].
Pro sudovu ekspertyzu: Zakon Ukrainy vid 25.02.1994 № 4038-ХІІ [in Ukrainian].
Repeshko, P. I. (2010) Sudovyi ekspert: spivvidnoshennia protsesualnoho statusu ta profesiinoi diialnosti: mater. Mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. internet-konferentsii «Suchasna nauka v merezhi Internet» 25-27 liutoho 2010 r. — Rezhym dostupu: http://intkonf.org/repeshko-pi-sudoviyekspert-spivvidnoshennya-protsesualnogo-statusu-ta-pofesiynoyi-diyalnosti/ (data zvernennia 22.07.2019) [in Ukrainian].
Rossinskaya, E. R. (2018). Teoreticheskie i prikladnye problemy sudebnoj ekspertizy. Teoriya i praktika sudebnoj ekspertizy v sovremennyh usloviyah: materialy mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii. MGYUA, 14-15 fevralya 2007 [in Russian].
Sherstiuk, V. M. (2007). Orhanizatsiino-pravovi ta moralno-psykholohichni zasady sudovo-ekspertnoi diialnosti: avtoref. dys. kand. yuryd. nauk: spets. 12.00.09. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
Shved, A. I. (2018). Sudebno-ekspertnaia deiatelnost v Belarusi: ot sozdaniia vedomstva k novatciiam segodniashnego dnia: zhurnal 1(6) Sudebnaia ekspertiza Belarusi [in Russian].

Abstract views: 30
PDF Downloads: 36
Published
2019-12-04
How to Cite
SoloveiО. (2019). SPECIFICS OF PROFESSIONAL TRAINING OFEMPLOYEES EXPERT OFFICE OF THE MINISTRY OF INTERNAL AFFAIRS OF UKRAINE. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science and Criminalistics, 20(2), 231-240. https://doi.org/10.32353/khrife.2.2019.17
Section
GENERAL REGULATIONS OF FORENSIC EXAMINATION