THE INVECTIGATION OF FALSIFICATION AND TURNOVER OF FALSIFIED MEDICINES: INVESTIGATOR INTERACTION PROBLEMS


Keywords: falsification and circulation of counterfeit medicines, interaction of the investigator in the investigation of counterfeiting and trafficking of counterfeit medicines, principles of interaction in the investigation of crimes, forms of interaction in the investigation of crimes, subjects of interaction in the investigation of crimes.

Abstract

The article deal with the problems of the interaction of the investigator in the investigation of falsification and turnover of falsified medicines. A detailed analysis of the scientists views on the definition of "interaction" as a scientific category, its principles and values that are debatable in criminalistics was carried out. Particular attention is paid to the criminalistic nature and forms of interaction in the investigated crime. It is substantiated that the systematization of forms of interaction of the investigator in the specified type of crimes investigation should be performed according to the criterion of the subject taking into account the peculiarities of their legal regulation.

According to the results of the generalization of the judicial and investigative practice materials, it is determined that the employees of the operational units and specialists are the main subjects of interaction with the investigator in the falsification and turnover of falsified medicines investigation.

In addition, it is noticed a great importance of the interaction of the investigator with the State Service for Medicines and Drug Control of Ukraine, actual forms of interaction of which include, among other things, the identification of signs of falsified medicines or activity related to falsification and prevention of these crimes.

Based on the specifics of such category of crimes, the necessity of increasing the level of interaction of the investigator has been proved, which will greatly contribute to the efficiency of conducting investigative (investigative) actions, saving forces and time at the beginning of criminal proceedings, which is a necessary prerequisite for successful investigation.

References

Hordin, L. Ya. (2008). Kryminalno-protsesualni problemy stvorennia ta diialnosti slidcho-operatyvnykh hrup.12.00.09. Nats. yuryd. akad. Ukrainy im. Yaroslava Mudroho. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
Hurkin, M. A. (2017). Protivodejstvie organizovannoj prestupnoj deyatelnosti v sfere obrasheniya falsificirovannyh nedobrokachestvennyh i nezaregistrirovannyh lekarstvennyh sredstv: kriminalisticheskie aspekty Kaliningrad [in Russian].
Ivanov, V. V. (1998). Vzaiemodiia operatyvnykh pidrozdiliv orhaniv vnutrishnikh sprav i slidchoho na dosudovykh stadiiakh kryminalnoho protsesu. 21.00.06. Nats. akad. vnutr. sprav Ukrainy. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Kerevych, O. V. (2001). Protsesualni ta psykholohichni osnovy vzaiemodii slidchoho ta orhanu diznannia v khodi rozkryttia i rozsliduvannia zlochyniv. 12.00.09. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Larichev, V. D., Kuleshova, A. V. (2019). Protivodejstvie prestupleniyam protiv zdorov’ya naseleniya, sovershaemye s ispolzovaniem poddelnoj medicinskoj produkcii. Moskva: Yurlitinform [in Russian].
Lisin, N. S. (2013). Planirovanie kak forma vzaimodejstviya sledovatelya s organami, osushestvlyayushuyu operativno-rozysknuyu deyatelnost, pri rassledovanii prestuplenij, sostavlyayushuyu molodezhnuyu organizovannuyu prestupnost. Rossijskij sledovatel: Yurist. Issue № 2. 9-11 [in Russian].
Maksimov, V. S. (2009). Taktika vzaimodejstviya uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. Vestnik OmGU, Seriya: Pravo. Issue №4. 222-226 [in Russian].
Maliuha, V. M. (2016). Vzaiemodiia slidchoho z operatyvnymy pidrozdilamy ta inshymy subiektamy v systemi metodyky rozsliduvannia zlochyniv. 12.00.09. Lvivskyi nats.un-t im. Ivana Franka. Lviv [in Ukrainian].
Marushev, A. D. (2011). Pryntsypy vzaiemodii slidchoho z uchasnykamy dosudovoho slidstva. Teoriia ta praktyka sudovoi ekspertyzy i kryminalistyky. Issue № 11. 133-138 [in Ukrainian].
Ozerskyi, I. V. (2004). Vzaiemodiia slidchoho z orhanom diznannia (orhanizatsiino-pravovyi ta psykholohichnyi analiz). Kyiv: MAUP [in Ukrainian].
Pcholkin, V. D. (2009). Vzaiemodiia slidchykh ta operatyvnykh pidrozdiliv pid chas rozkryttia ta rozsliduvannia zlochyniv. Dosudove rozsliduvannia: aktualni problemy ta shliakhy yikh vyrishennia: materialy postiino diiuch. nauk.-prakt. seminaru (23 zhovt. 2009 r.). Kharkiv. 97-103 [in Ukrainian].
Pyvovarov, V. V., Shcherbyna, L. I. (2006). Vzaiemodiia orhaniv dosudovoho slidstva ta diznannia pry rozsliduvanni kryminalnykh sprav. Kharkiv: Pravo [in Ukrainian].
Samoilenko, O. A. (2019). Pochatok kryminalnoho provadzhennia (z pozytsii kryminalistychnoi nauky). Pravo i suspilstvo. Issue №2. 226-231 [in Ukrainian].
Shepitko, V. Yu. (2001). Kryminalistyka: entsykl. slov. (ukr.-ros. i ros.-ukr.) za red. V. Ya. Tatsiia; Akad. prav. nauk Ukrainy. Kharkiv: Pravo [in Ukrainian].
Shepitko, V. Yu. (2019). Vydy i formy vzaiemodiii u rozkrytti y rozsliduvanni zlochyniv. Kryminalistyka: pidruchnyk: u 2 t. T. 2. Kharkiv: Pravo [in Ukrainian].
Slinko, S. V. (1991). Sushnost, formy i pravovye osnovy vzaimodejstviya sledovatelya s organom doznaniya. 12.00.09. Ukr. yurid. akad. im.
F. E. Dzerzhinskogo. Kharkov [in Russian].
Sukhodubov, V. S. (2019). Osnovy metodyky rozsliduvannia vbyvstv, poiednanykh z vidchuzhenniam zhytla hromadian. Natsionalnyi yurydychnykh universytet imeni Yaroslava Mudroho. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
Topchii, V. V. (2014). Vzaiemodiia orhaniv dosudovoho rozsliduvannia ta operatyvnykh pidrozdiliv u skladi slidcho-operatyvnykh hrup. Yurydychnyi visnyk. Issue № 4(33). 138-143 [in Ukrainian].
Volobuiev, A. F. (2006). Vzaiemodiia slidchoho z operatyvnymy pidrozdilamy pry rozsliduvanni ekonomichnykh zlochyniv. Forum prava. Issue № 1. 16-19 [in Ukrainian].
Volobuieva, O. O. (2004). Poniattia i pryntsypy vzaiemodii slidchoho zi spetsialistamy pid chas zboru informatsii pro osobu pidozriuvanoho. Visnyk Luhanskoi akademii vnutrishnikh sprav MVS imeni 10-richchia nezalezhnosti Ukrainy. Issue № 2. 242-249 [in Ukrainian].
Yaremchuk, V. O. (2015). Orhanizatsiia i taktyka zaluchennia spetsialista pry provedenni slidchykh (rozshukovykh) dii. Kharkiv: Apostil [in Ukrainian].
Yukhno, O. O. (2017). Zavdannia, pryntsypy, napriamy ta rivni vzaiemodii pry rozkrytti ta rozsliduvanni kryminalnykh pravoporushen. Vzaiemodiia slidchoho z inshymy orhanamy i pidrozdilamy pry rozkrytti ta rozsliduvanni kryminalnykh pravoporushen: navchalnyi posibnyk. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
Zaiats, D. D. (2006). Poniattia vzaiemodii u borotbi zi zlochynnistiu: kryminalistychnyi pidkhid. Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu vnutrishnikh sprav. Issue № 32. 7-11 [in Ukrainian].
Zhuravel, V. A. (2018). Velyka ukrainska yurydychna entsyklopediia: u 20 t. T. 20: Kryminalistyka, sudova ekspertyza, yurydychna psykholohiia, redkol.:
V. Iu. Shepitko ta in., Nats. yuryd. un-t im. Yaroslava Mudroho [in Ukrainian].

Abstract views: 40
PDF Downloads: 38
Published
2019-12-04
How to Cite
Parfylo, I. (2019). THE INVECTIGATION OF FALSIFICATION AND TURNOVER OF FALSIFIED MEDICINES: INVESTIGATOR INTERACTION PROBLEMS. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science and Criminalistics, 20(2), 72-87. https://doi.org/10.32353/khrife.2.2019.05