Modern Problems and Main Aspects of Criminal Law Fight Against Hooliganism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32353/khrife.4.2024.11Keywords:
hooliganism; criminal justice; sociocultural dynamics; expert provision of hooliganism investigation; legal reform; youth at risk.Abstract
The paper explores current issues and main aspects of such an unlawful phenomenon as hooliganism. The author examines its historical development and the problems it creates for modern society. The research aims to identify the factors that contribute to the spread of hooliganism from its inception to the present day. Both legislative and social aspects of hooliganism are considered. This paper explores the changes in the social, cultural and economic spheres that give rise to hooliganism and contribute to its existence in many countries. The research also assesses effectiveness of current legal systems in preventing hooliganism, pointing out important shortcomings and problems in the methods used by the authorities. Socio-economic changes, cultural influences and social perspectives are explored, and a detailed understanding of why hooliganism persists despite legal initiatives to suppress it is provided. This study attempts to bridge the gap between legal concepts and actual implementation by taking an interdisciplinary approach and providing policy suggestions that improve ability of the judicial system to stop hooliganism. Results emphasize the need for improved criminal justice system cooperation, targeted social action and adapted laws, especially for young people considered to be at risk. To achieve the set goal, the following scientific methods were used: analysis, synthesis, statistical analysis, generalization, etc.
References
Armstrong, T. A., & Boutwell, B. B. (2012). Low Resting Heart Rate and Rational Choice: Integrating Biological Correlates of Crime in Criminological Theories. Journal of Criminal Justice. Vol. 40. Is. 1. DOI: 10.1016/j. jcrimjus.2011.11.001.
Becker, H. S. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. New York : Free Press Glencoe. Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, Shame and Reintegration. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511804618.
Cohen, A. K. (1955). Delinquent Boys: The Culture of the Gang. Glencoe ; IL : Free Press. Ex Post Paper. (2018). Learning from adjacent fields: The relation between extremism and hooliganism. Study visit to Warsaw (PL). RAN Centre of Excellence. URL: https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/document/download/ cf539884-5f8f-4df3-a623-d1434959c622_en.
Garland, D. (2001). The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. University of Chicago Press.
Garner, B. (2019). Black’s Law Dictionary. 11th ed. Thomson Reuters.
Gelder, K. (2007). Subcultures: Cultural Histories and Social Practice. London : Routledge. URL: https://www.academia.edu/29530845/Subcultures_Cultural_Histories_and_Social_Practice_Routledge_2007_.
Gross, R. (2015). Psychology: The Science of Mind and Behaviour. 7th ed. London : Hodder Education.
Harcourt, B. E., & Ludwig, J. (2006). Broken Windows: New Evidence from New York City and a Five-city Social Experiment. The University of Chicago Law Review. Vol. 73. Is. 1. URL: https://chicagounbound.uchicago. edu/uclrev/vol73/iss1/14/.
Hawkins, J. D. (2006). Science, Social Work, Prevention: Finding the Intersections. Social Work Research. Vol. 30. Is. 3. DOI: 10.1093/ swr/30.3.137.
Jusko, P., & Weihe, H.-J. W. (2024). Football Hooliganism as a Socio-Political Phenomenon: Motivation, Manifestations, and Prevention Strategies. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska. Sectio J, Paedagogia-Psychologia. Vol. 37. Is. 1. DOI: 10.17951/ j.2024.37.1.207-216.
Korzhanskyi, M. Y. (2002). Kvalifikatsiia zlochyniv [Crime Qualification] : navch. posib. 2-he vyd. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Kossakowski, R. (2015) Where are the hooligans? Dimensions of football fandom in Poland. International Review for the Sociology of Sport. Art. 52(6). DOI: 10.1177/1012690215612458.
Kulyk, Ya. O. (2020). Problemy pryznachennia sudovoi ekspertyzy u kryminalnomu provadzhenni [Problems of Appointment of Forensic Examination in Criminal Proceedings]. ΛόhoΣ.Online. № 16. EOI: 10.11232/2663-4139.16.68 [in Ukrainian].
Maronna, R. A. (2011). Richard Berk: Statistical learning from a regression perspective. Statistical Papers. Art. 52(4). DOI: 10.1007/ s00362-010-0313-x.
Merton, R. K. (1938). Social structure and anomie. American Sociological Review. Vol. 3. No. 5. URL: https://www.jstor.org/ stable/2084686.
Naklovych, M. L. (1974). Kryminalno-pravova borotba z khulihanstvom [Criminal Law Fight Against Hooliganism]. Lviv [in Ukrainian].
Nalutsyshyn, V. V. (2009). Kryminalna vidpovidalnist za khulihanstvo (st. 296 KK Ukrainy) [Criminal Liability for Hooliganism (Art. 296 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine)] : monohrafiia. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
Pearson, G. (1983). Hooligan: A History of Respectable Fears. London : Macmillan Press.
Pohl, K. D. (1981). Handbuch der Naturwissenschaftlichen Kriminalistik. Heidelberg. Postanova VS shchodo khulihanstva iz zastosuvanniam zbroi chy predmeta dlia nanesennia tilesnykh ushkodzhen [Supreme Court Ruling on Hooliganism with the Use of Weapons or Objects for Inflicting Bodily Harm] (2018) / Sudova vlada Ukrainy : ofits. sait. 13.09.2018. URL: https://supreme.court.gov.ua/supreme/ pres-centr/news/554532/ [in Ukrainian].
Ranstorp, M. (2016). The Root Causes of Violent Extremism. The Basics. RAN Practitioners. URL: https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/document/download/63770ad9-8c0b-44c4-a568-254bb22a8009_en?filename=ran_root_causes_of_violent_extremism_ranstorp_meines_july_2024.pdf&prefLang=de.
Shcherbakovskyi, M. H. (2010). Pro nedopustymist pryznachennia sudovoi ekspertyzy dlia rishennia pravovykh pytan [About Inadmissibility of Appointment of Judicial Examination for the Decision of Legal Questions]. Forum prava. № 4. URL: http://nbuv. gov.ua/UJRN/FP_index.htm_2010_4_159 [in Ukrainian].
Szczekala, A. (2008). Chuligański charakter czynu [Hooligan character of act]. Prokuratura i Prawo. Nr. 6. URL: https://polona.pl/item-view/408eb57c-99ad-454f-93a0-4eb0bc2693a5?page=NaN [in Poland].
Tertyshnyk, V.M. (2024). Nastilna knyha slidchoho [Investigator’s Handbook]. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Tigani, S., Ouzzif, M., & Hasbi, A. (2017). Markov chains and linear model-based hybrid prediction algorithm for cognitive agents. International Journal of Intelligent Systems Design and Computing. Art. 1(1/2). DOI: 10.1504/IJISDC.2017.082845.
Tsoukala, A. (2009). Football Hooliganism in Europe: Security and Civil Liberties in the Balance. Basingstoke, UK : Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1057/9780230594661.
Tyurin, P. (2012). Psihologiya mezhdu bukvoj i duhom zakona (teoriya i praktika yuridicheskoj psihologii) [Psychology Between the Letter and the Spirit of Law: Theory and Practice of Legal Psychology]. Riga [in Russian].
Yefimov, M. M. (2012). Vykorystannia spetsialnykh znan pid chas rozsliduvannia khulihanstva [The use of specific expertise during hooliganism investigation]. Pravo i suspilstvo. № 3. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/ UJRN/Pis_2012_3_51 [in Ukrainian].
Zara, G. (2010). “Farrington, David P.: The Integrated Cognitive Antisocial Potential Theory”. In: Cullen F. T. & Wilcox P. (Eds.). Encyclopedia of Criminological Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage Publications URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311208605_Zara_G_2010_Farrington_David_P_The_Integrated_Cognitive_Antisocial_Potential_Theory_In_F_T_Cullen_P_Wilcox_Eds_Encyclopedia_of_Criminological_Theory_pp_313-322_Thousand_Oaks_CA_Sage_Publication.
