Stereotype as an Obstruction to Justice and Its Influence on a Judge While Consideration of a Criminal Proceeding
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32353/khrife.3.2023.08Keywords:
stereotype; stereotyping; stigmatization; gender stereotype; criminal procedure; trial; discrimination of parties in a criminal proceeding.Abstract
Consideration by a judge of criminal cases is closely related to the formation of internal conviction, which, in turn, is influenced by numerous factors, including internal psychological ones. One of them is the phenomenon of stereotyping, inherent to every person as a component of human social nature. The Article Purpose is to analyze the phenomenon of stereotype, its historical development, and study into the influence of the stereotyping process on the judge while consideration of criminal cases. To fulfil the specified goal, a systematic approach was chosen out of general scientific and special scientific methods, among which the most widely used are: historical-legal, formal-legal, and systemic-structural. Significance of the stereotyping phenomenon for society as a whole and for an individual in particular has been also analyzed, its influence on a judge’s internal perception of the defendant and case circumstances, as well as its impact on evidence evaluation in a criminal proceeding. The influence of various types of stereotypes on perception by a judge of a person brought to criminal responsibility (depending on his/her gender, race, or nationality) has been studied, along with racial bias during consideration of criminal cases (depending on crime type). It has been proven that a deeply-rooted stereotype can influence the development of a judge’s internal conviction, and therefore, evaluation of evidence in a case, the decision on a person’s guilt (innocence), determination of punishment, etc. It has been highlighted that stereotyping during administration of criminal cases by a judge negatively affects the judge’s impartiality and may provoke discrimination against parties in a criminal proceeding, which is inadmissible.
References
Akademichnyi tlumachnyi slovnyk ukrainskoi movy [The Ukrainian Language Explanatory Dictionary] (1978) : v 11 t. / za red. I. K. Bilodida. Kyiv, 1970—1980. T. 9. URL: http://sum.in.ua/s/stereotyp [in Ukrainian].
Blynova, O. Ye. (2015). Rol sotsialnykh stereotypiv u stanovlenni svitohliadnykh oriientatsii osobystosti [The role of social stereotypes in the formation of person’s mindset orientations]. Psykholohiia i osobystist. № 2 (8). URL: http://ekhsuir. kspu.edu/bitstream/handle/123456789/ 712/%D0%91%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%B D%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%203%20 %282015%29.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y [in Ukrainian].
Cusack, S. (2013). Gender Stereotyping as a Human Rights Violation : Research Re-port. URL: https://www.esem.org.mk/pdf/ Najznachajni%20vesti/2014/3/Cusack.pdf.
Drozdovych, N. L. (2010). Vnutrishnie pere-konannia suddi yak element pryntsypu vilnoi otsinky dokaziv [The judge’s inner conviction is an integral component of the principle of free evidence evaluation]. Chasopys Kyivskoho universytetu prava. № 1. URL: http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/bitstream/ handle/123456789/23307/45-Drozdovych. pdf?sequence=1 [in Ukrainian].
Ellison, L., Munro, V. E. (2010). A Stranger in the Bushes, or an Elephant in the Room? Critical Reflections Upon Received Rape Myth Wisdom in the Context of a Mock Jury Study. New Criminal Law Review. Vol. 13. No. 4. DOI: 10.1525/nclr.2010.13.4.781.
Jones, C. S., Kaplan, M. F. (2003). The Effects of Racially Stereotypical Crimes on Juror Decision-Making and Information-Processing Strategies. Basic and Applied Social Psychology. Vol. 25. Is. 1. DOI: 10.1207/ S15324834BASP2501_1.
Khymovych, O. S. (2018). Osnovni teoretychni kontseptsii u vyvchenni stereotypiv [Fundamental theoretical concepts in the study of “stereotypes”]. Visnyk Lvivskoho universytetu. Seriia sotsiolohichna. Vyp. 12. DOI: 10.30970/vso.2018.12.17 [in Ukrainian].
Kleider, H. M., Knuycky, L. R., Cavrak, S. E. (2012). Deciding the Fate of Others: The Cognitive Underpinnings of Racially Biased Juror Decision Making. The Journal of 256 General Psychology. Vol. 139. Is. 3. DOI: 10.1080/00221309.2012.686462.
Lippmann, W. (1998). Public Opinion / with a new introduction by M. CurtIs. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick (U. S. A.) and London (U. K.). URL: https://monoskop. org/images/b/bf/Lippman_Walter_Public_ Opinion.pdf.
McKimmie, B. M. (2017). Stereotypes in the Courtroom / New Directions for Law in Austra-lia: Essays in Contemporary Law Reform; ed. by R. Levy et al. Australia : ANU Press. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1ws7wbh.19.
McKimmie, B. M., Masser, B. M., Bongiorno, R. (2014). What Counts as Rape? The Effect of Offense Prototypes, Victim Stereotypes, and Participant Gender on How the Complainant and Defendant are Perceived. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. Vol. 29. Is. 12. DOI: 10.1177/0886260513518843.
Melekh, L. V. (2015). Problemy otsinky dokaziv u protsesi dokazuvannia [Evaluation of evidence as of the process of proof]. Visnyk Luhanskoho derzhavnoho universytetu vnutrishnikh sprav imeni E. O. Didorenka. Vyp. 4. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/ Vlduvs_2015_4_21 [in Ukrainian].
Nyquist, L. V., Spence, J. T. (1986). Effects of dispositional dominance and sex role expectations on leadership behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 50. Is. 1. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.50.1.87.
Poltorak, V. A., Zoska, Ya. V., Stadnyk, A. H. (2021). Sotsialni stereotypy i hromadska dumka: problemy vzaiemozviazku ta vzaiemovplyvu [Social stereotypes and public opinion: problems of relationship and mutual influence]. Aktualni problemy filosofii ta sotsiolohii. № 27. DOI: 10.32837/ apfs.v0i27.931 [in Ukrainian].
Pribytkova, N. O. (2016). Kharakterystyka osnovnykh faktoriv poshyrennia rasyzmu ta
ksenofobii yak fonovykh dlia zlochynnosti yavyshch v Ukraini [Characterization of the main factors contributing to the spread of racism and xenophobia as underlying phenomena for criminality in Ukraine]. Pravo i bezpeka. № 2 (61). URL: https:// dspace.univd.edu.ua/items/68e5d281-4d15-4c6c-9805-32c741dbaf70 [in Ukrainian].
Ridgeway, C. L., Diekema, D. (1992). Are Gender Differences Status Differences? / Gender, Interaction and Inequality ; ed. C. L. Ridgeway. New York. URL: https://link.springer.com/cha pter/10.1007/978-1-4757-2199-7_7.
Semashko, T. (2023). Movna svidomist, movna kartyna svitu ta steretypy yak stsenarii yikh vzaiemodii [Language consciousness, linguistic picture of the world and stereotypes as a scenario of their interaction]. Teoretychna i dydaktychna filolohiia. Vyp. 36. DOI: 10.31470/2309-15-17-2023-187-200 [in Ukrainian].
Shevchenko, L. O., Kobikova, Yu. V., La-mash, I. V., Forotynska, O. V. ta in. (2015). Gender u psykholohichnykh ta sotsiolohichnykh doslidzhenniakh [Gender in psychological and sociological research] : navch. posib. Kyiv. URL: https://dspace. univd.edu.ua/items/1b6b28a8-cdc9-4644-9c80-a7e99d13b9c5 [in Ukrainian].
Sunnafrank, M., Fontes, N. E. (1983). Gener-al and crime related racial stereotypes and influence on juridic decisions. Cor-nell Journal of Social Relations. Vol. 17. Is. 1. URL: https://psycnet.apa.org/ record/1984-20492-001.
Sweeney, L. T., Haney, C. (2006). The Influence of Race on Sentencing: A Meta-Analytic Review of Experimental Studies. Behavioral Sciences & the Law. Vol. 10. Is. 2. DOI: 10.1002/bsl.2370100204.
