IMPROVEMENT OF FORENSIC SUPPORT: THEORETICAL, LEGAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL ASPECTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32353/khrife.1.2019.08Keywords:
legal proceedings, forensic science, standardization, paradigm, scientific revolution, expertology.Abstract
The article purpose is to determine conceptual foundations and directions of the formation of the modern paradigm of forensic justice.
The problems affecting the quality and effectiveness of forensic examinations include the following: untimely arrival of forensic experts at the scene that subsequently often leads to unsuitability of research objects; lack of an adequate arsenal of forensic methods; lack of high-tech equipment that can be used to perform certain types of forensic researches; insufficient generalizations of international positive and negative experience for organizing forensic activities; imperfection of legal acts regulating forensic activities, etc.
In order to solve the problems of timely receipt of research objects by a forensic expert, in addition to resolving issues of their prompt withdrawal and providing them for a forensic examination, it is necessary to update the development of theoretical and applied principles for the technology of performing certain types of traditional and innovative forensic researches; to develop a developed system of scientific and practical seminars (trainings) including at the appropriate training grounds in relevant areas of forensic science activity.
An important factor in improving the expert provision of justice in Ukraine is consideration of the requirements of European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ Guidelines) and further cooperation with ENFSI.
As an important criterion for the effective development of expert support for justice, one can also single out the need for more precise legislative regulation of guarantees for the provision of forensic expert activity.
Implementation of the proposed measures will ensure the forensic expert independence, optimize forensic activities and significantly increase its effectiveness.
References
Basic Principles on the Independence of the Judiciary. United Nations Human Rights. Office of the High Commissioner URL: http://www.ohchr.org/ EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/IndependenceJudiciary.as px.
Chechil, Yu. (2019). Mizhnarodni standarty sudovo-ekspertnoyi praktyky u svitli hlobalizatsiynykh protsesiv. Vyp. 2. URL: http://vjhr.sk/archive/ 2019_2/part_2/28.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Cryminalnyi protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy. URL : http://search.ligazakon.ua/ l_doc2.nsf/link1/T124651.html [in Ukrainian].
Dzhavadov, Fuad Musa Ohly (2000). Kontseptualʹni osnovy rozvytku sudovoyi ekspertyzy v suchasnykh umovakh: dis.... d-ra yurid. nauk: 12.00.09. Kyiv: NaVS Ukrayiny [in Ukrainian].
Ishchenko, А. V. (1996). Metodolohichni ta orhanizatsiini problemy rozvytku kryminalistychnykh Naukovykh doslidzhen: dys. d-ra yuryd. nauk 12.00.09. Kiev [in Russian].
Klimenko, N. I. (2013). Zahalʹna teoriya sudovoyi ekspertolohiyi: ponyattya i mistse v systemi Naukovoho znannya. Zbirnyk Naukovykh pratsʹ Irpinsʹkoyi finansovo yurydychnoyi akademiyi (ekonomika, pravo). Vyp. 2. 101-106 [in Ukrainian].
Moyisyeyev, O. M. (2000). Ekspertni tekhnolohiyi v sudovo-ekspertniy diyalʹnosti: teoretychni zasady ta praktyka vykorystannya : dis.... d-ra yurid. nauk: 12.00.09. Kiev: NaVS Ukrayiny [in Russian].
Petrova, I. A. (2012). Teoretyko-pravovi ta orhanizatsiyno-metodolohichni zasady rehulyuvannya sudovo-tovaroznavchykh ekspertyz spozhyvchykh tovariv: dys. ... d-ra yuryd. nauk: 12.00.09. Kharkiv: KHNUVS [in Ukrainian].
Pro sudovu ekspertyzu: Zakon Ukrainy: dated on 25.02.1994 № 4038-XII. Bulletin of Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine 1994. № 28. Art: 232. URL: http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4038-12 [in Ukrainian].
Pyrih, I. V. (2015). Teoretychni osnovy ekspertnoho zabezpechennya dosudovoho rozsliduvannya: dys. ... d-ra yuryd. nauk: 12.00.09 Kharkiv: KHNUVS [in Ukrainian].
Shcherbakovsʹkyy, M. H. (2016). Teoretyko-metodolohichni ta prakseolohichni zasady sudovykh ekspertyz u Novomu protsesi: dys. ... d-ra yuryd. nauk: 12.00.09 Kharkiv: KHNUVS [in Ukrainian].
Shynkarenko, I. R., Spitsyna, H. O. (2018). Istorychni vytoky ta perspektyvy rozvytku teoriyi ta praktyky sudovoyi ekspertyzy. Aktualʹni pytannya sudovoyi ekspertyzy ta kryminalistyky: zb. materialiv mizhnarodnoyi naukovo-praktychnoyi konferentsiyi prysvyachenoyi 95-richchyu stvorennya Kharkivsʹkoho Naukovo- doslidnoho instytutu sudovykh ekspertyz im. Zasl. prof. M.S. Bokariusa, 10-11 zhovtnya 2018 r). Kharkiv. 20-24 [in Ukrainian].
Shynkarenko, I. R., Spitsyna, H. O. (2018). Shchodo zaprovadzhennya yevropeysʹkykh standartiv zabezpechennya prav i svobod lyudyny u sudovo-ekspertniy diyalʹnosti. Aktualʹni pytannya dosudovoho rozsliduvannya ta tendentsiyi rozvytku kryminalistychnoyi metodyky : tezy dopovidey vseukrayinsʹkoyi Naukovo-praktychnoyi konferentsiyi, 21 lystopada 2018 r. Kharkiv: KHNUVS. 211-213 [in Ukrainian].
Simakova-Yefremian, E. B. (2017). Teoretyko-pravovi ta metodologichni zasady kompleksnykh sudovo-ekspertnykh doslidzhen: dys. ... d-ra yuryd. nauk: 12.00.09 Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
Svidersʹkyy, O. O. (2019). Shlyakhy podolannya problem provedennya sudovykh ekspertyz (za materialamy uzahalʹnennya ekspertnoyi praktyky). Aktualʹni pytannya sudovoyi ekspertyzy i kryminalistyky : zbirnyk materialiv mizhnarod. nauk.-prakt. konf., prysvyachenoyi 150-richchyu vid dnya Narodzhennya Zasl. prof. M. S. Bokariusa (Kharkiv, 18-19 kvit. 2019 r.). Kharkiv: KHNDISE. 93- 96, 94 [in Ukrainian].
Yevdokimenko, S. V. (2009). Stanovlennya nauky pro sudovu ekspertyzu: istorychnyy aspekt. Forum prava. № 2. 145-149. URL: http: Downloads/FP_index.htm_2009_2_24.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Yevdokimenko, S.V. (2017). Sudovo-ekonomichna ekspertyza: teoretyko- metodolohichni zasady i praktyka realizatsiyi: dys. ... d-ra yuryd. nauk: 12.00.09 Kharkiv: KHNUVS [in Ukrainian].
