Integrating Scientific and Technical Achievements into Forensic Expert Activity: Procedural Aspect
Abstract
The Article Purpose is a comprehensive analysis of the current “Theory and Practice of Forensic Science and Criminalistics” Research Paper Collection considering the issue of integrating specific expertise into court proceedings. The importance of the role of specific expertise in ensuring the efficiency, lawfulness, and objectivity of forensic expert activity is undeniable. That is why the editor-in-chief highlighted procedural forms in which integration processes occurr. In the scholarly contributions to this issue, both international and Ukrainian authors address numerous pressing issues within the forensic domain—encompassing theoretical aspects (notably, the concept of expectations in law and criminalistics, as well as challenges arising from the global digital transformation of society) and practical dimensions (such as specifics of terminal and external ballistics of damaging elements, conduct of multidisciplinary forensic psychological and linguistic examinations, significance of specific expertise in investigating criminal offenses perpetrated by professional participants in court proceedings)—while proposing ways for their resolution
References
Boichenko, S. B., Boiarov, V. I., Budko, T. V., Varfolomeieva, T. V. ta in. (2015). Ekspertyzy u sudochynstvi Ukrainy [Expert Examinations in the Judiciary of Ukraine]: nauk.-prakt. posib. / za zah. red. V. H. Honcharenka ta I. V. Hory. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Bondarenko, O. O. (2013). Ob’iekt i predmet sudovoi ekspertyzy u kryminalnomu sudochynstvi [Object and subject matter of forensic examination in criminal proceedings]. Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni V. N. Karazina. Seriia «Pravo». № 1082. Vyp. 16. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/VKhIPR_2013_1082_16_56 [in Ukrainian].
Hroshevyi, Yu. M., Stakhivskyi, S. M. (2006). Dokazy i dokazuvannia u kryminalnomu protsesi [Evidence and proof in criminal procedure]: nauk.-prakt. posib. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Klymenko, N. I. (2006). Intehratsiina funktsiia ekspertolohii [Integrative function of expertology]. Teoriia ta praktyka sudovoi ekspertyzy i kryminalistyky. Vyp. 6 [in Ukrainian].
Konovalova, V. E. (1977). O znachenii i funkciyah ekspertnyh versij [On the meaning and functions of forensic expert versions]. Kriminalistika i sudebnaya ekspertiza. Vyp. 14 [in Russian].
Müller-Armack, A. (1976). Wirtschaftsordnung und Wirtschaftspolitik. Studien Integration [Economic system and economic policy. Studies in integration]. Bern; Stuttgart [in German].
Segaj, M. Ya. (1970). Metodologiya sudebnoj identifikacii [Forensic identification methodology]: monografiya. Kiev [in Russian].
Segaj, M. Ya., Strinzha, V. K. (1997). Sudebnaya ekspertiza materialnyh sledov-otobrazhenij (problemy metodologii) [Forensic analysis of physical trace-impressions (methodology challenges)]: monografiya. Kiev [in Russian].
Shepitko, V. Yu. (2012). O predelah ispolzovaniya specialnyh znanij v ugolovnom processe [The scope and limits of specific expertise in criminal procedure]. Aktualni problemi kriminalnogo prava, procesu ta kriminalistiki: mat-ly IV Mizhnar. nauk.-prak. konf., prysviach. 95-rich. Z dnia narodzh. prof. M. V. Saltevskoho (Odesa, 02.11.2012). Odesa [in Russian].
Shepitko, V. Yu. (2014). Problemy vykorystannia spetsialnykh znan kriz pryzmu suchasnoho kryminalnoho sudochynstva v Ukraini [Challenges in the use of specific expertise within modern Ukrainian criminal justice]. Sudova ekspertyza. № 1 [in Ukrainian].
Simakova-Yefremian, E. B. (2016). Kompleksni sudovo-ekspertni doslidzhennia: teoriia ta praktyka [Multidisciplinary forensic examinations: theory and practice]: monohrafiia. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
Viner, J. (1950). The Customs Union Issue. NY.
Wiles, P. J. D. (1968). Communist International Economics. Oxford.
Abstract views: 96 PDF Downloads: 48 PDF Downloads: 22
