Problematic Aspects of the Classification of Forensic Economic Examination


Keywords: forensic economic examination; judicial system; classification features; classification criterion; economic relations; types of activities.

Abstract

The theoretical-methodological foundations of the development of forensic economic examination regarding the determination of classification features of its species composition have not only theoretical-methodological, but also direct practical significance in the activities of expert economists, as well as judicial investigative bodies in the event that the latter appoint this type of examinations. This research paper’s purpose is to study the criteria for the classification of forensic economic examinations, established by soviet scientific thought, aimed at improving the systematization of their species composition. Using the techniques of analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction and generalization, it was determined that the emergence of new types and sorts of forensic economic examinations depends on factors that can be combined into two groups: 1) socio-economic relations — a change of their format; 2) judicial and investigative practice —emergence of new objects of research and tasks; 3) economic offenses — new ways, techniques of committing economic crimes. It has been established that the structural differentiation of this type of forensic examinations is due to the procedural needs of the judicial and investigative practice. It has been found that the criterion for systematization of the species composition of forensic examinations belongs to the economic plane, namely to the distribution of social production into the spheres of material and immaterial production. The next stage of the distribution of economic examinations is to the relevant industries according to certain types of activity with the definition of the main criterion of classification — according to the type of production activity. Thanks to this, compliance with the set of requirements for the scientifically based selection of classification criteria with the distinction of sorts and types of economic examinations is ensured.

References

Anishchenko, О. V., Khomutenko, О. V. (2018). Classification of forensic economic examination at the modern stage of development of forensic science. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science and Criminalistics. Vyp. 18. DOI: 10.32353/khrife.2018.54 [in Ukrainian].
Cheberiak, P. P. (2013). Zavdannia sudovykh ekspertyz pry rozkrytti y rozsliduvanni zlochyniv, vchynenykh v ekonomichnii sferi Ukrainy [Tasks of forensic examination in the detection and investigation of crimes committed in the economic sphere of Ukraine]. Naukovi zapysky Lvivskoho universytetu biznesu ta prava. Vyp. 10. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/ Nzlubp_2013_10_22 [in Ukrainian].
Dikan, L. V., Ponikarov, V. D., Kozhushko, O. V. (2014). Sudovo-ekonomichna ekspertyza [Forensic economic examination]: navch. posib. Kharkiv. URL : http://repository. hneu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/7964 [in Ukrainian].
Ekonomichna entsyklopediia [Economic encyclopedia] (2000) : u 3 t. T. 1 / redkol.: S. V. Mochernyi (vidp. red.) ta in. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Ekonomichna teoriia: Politekonomiia [Economic theory: Political Economy] (2007) : pidruch. / za red. V. D. Bazylevycha. 6-te vyd., pererob. i dop. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Ekspertyzy u sudochynstvi Ukrainy [Examinations in the judiciary of Ukraine] (2017) : nauk.-prakt. posib. / za zah. red. V. H. Honcharenka. Kyiv. URL: https:// pidru4niki.com/74883/pravo/klasifikatsiya_ ekspertiz_harakterom_galuzi_spetsialnih_ znan [in Ukrainian].
Foris, Iu. B., Koloniuk, V. P. (2018). O sistemnom analize sudebno-ehkspertnykh klassifikatsii [On the systematic analysis of forensic classifications]. Kryminalistyka i sudova ekspertyza. Vyp. 63 (1). URL: https://digest.kndise.gov.ua/wp-content/ uploads/2021/06/2018_1.pdf [in Russian].
Gurehu, N., Lopatenko, I. (2018). O sovershenstvovanii klassifikatsii sudebnykh ehkspertiz [On the improvement of the classififcation of forensic examinations]. Aktualni pytannia sudovoi ekspertyzy ta kryminalistyky : zb. mat-liv mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konf. do 95-richchia stvorennia Kharkiv. NDISE im. Zasl. prof. M. S. Bokariusa (Kharkiv, 10—11.10.2018). Kharkiv [in Russian].
Hres, N. L., Nedostup, K. K. (2020). Orhanizatsiino-protsesualni osnovy sudovo-ekonomichnoi ekspertyzy [Organizational and procedural foundations of forensic economic examination]: navch. posib. Dnipro. URL: http://ir.nmu.org.ua/ handle/123456789/158744 [in Ukrainian].
Klymenko, N. I., Fedchyshyna, V. V. (2016). Sudovo-ekonomichna ekspertyza [Forensic economic examination]: suchasnyi stan i aktualni pytannia. Kryminalistychnyi visnyk. № 1 (25). URL: https://visnyk.dndekc.mvs.gov.ua/index.php/visnuk/issue/view/28/ISSN%201992-4437%20 %D0%9A%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%BC% D 1 % 9 6 % D 0 % BD % D 0 % B 0 % D 0 % BB % D1 %9 6 %D1 %8 1 %D1 %8 2 %D0 %B8 %D 1 %8 7 %D0 %BD%D0 %B8 %D0 %B9 %2 0 %D0%B2%D1%96%D1%81%D0%BD%D0-%B8%D0%BA%201%20%2825%29%202016 [in Ukrainian].
Matusovskii, G. A. (1999). Ehkonomicheskie prestupleniia: kriminalisticheskii analiz [Economic crimes: forensic analysis]. Kharkov. URL: https://library.nlu.edu.ua/ POLN_TEXT/KNIGI/MATUSOVSKIY_1999. pdf [in Russian].
Panchenko, I. A. Etapy rozvytku sudovo-bukhhalterskoi ekspertyzy [Stages of development of forensic accounting expertise]. URL: http://www.rusnauka.com/19_NNM_2007/Economics/23348.doc. htm [in Ukrainian].
Pyrih, I. V. (2015). Teoretyko-prykladni problemy ekspertnoho zabezpechennia dosudovoho rozsliduvannia [Theoretical and applied issues of expert provision of pre-trial investigation]: monohrafiia. Dnipropetrovsk. URL: https://er.dduvs.in.ua/bitstream/123456789/2363/1/%D0%B C%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B3%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%84%D1%96%D1%8F_ 2_%D0%9F%D0%B8%D1%80%D1%96%D0%B3_%D0%BC%D0%B0%D0%BA%D0%B5-%D1%82.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Shushko, O. O. (2019). Zabezpechennia ekonomichnoi bezpeky natsionalnoi ekonomiky shliakhom ekonomichnoi ekspertyzy [Ensuring the economic security of the national economy through economic expertise]: dys. … kand. ekon. nauk. Zaporizhzhia [in Ukrainian].
Simakova-Yefremian, E. B., Fedorenko, V. L., Svyrydova, L. V. ta in. (2021). Klasyfikatsiia sudovykh ekspertyz [Classification of forensic examinations]: monohrafiia / za zah. red. E. B. Simakovoi-Yefremian. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
Svintsytskyi, A. V., Padalka, A. M. (2020). Poniattia ta znachennia sudovykh ekspertyz u rozkrytti y rozsliduvanni orhanizovanoi zlochynnoi diialnosti u sferi opodatkuvannia [The concept and significance of forensic examinations in disclosure and investigation of organized criminal activity in the field of taxation]. Informatsiia i pravo. № 3 (34). DOI: 10.37750/2616-6798.2020.3(34).220999 [in Ukrainian].
Ukrainska radianska entsyklopediia [Ukrainian Soviet Encyclopedia] (1980) : u 12 t. T. 5 / za red. M. P. Bazhana. Kyiv. URL: https:// leksika.com.ua/19120918/ure/klasifikatsiya [in Ukrainian].
Yunatskyi, O. V. (2016). Konspekt lektsii z dystsypliny «Ekspertolohiia» [Syllabus of lectures on the discipline “Expertology”]. Dnipro. URL: https://dduvs.in.ua/wp-content/uploads/f iles/Structure/ library/student/lectures/1130/3.1.pdf [in Ukrainian].

Abstract views: 56
PDF Downloads: 65
Published
2023-04-18
How to Cite
Horlachuk, A. (2023). Problematic Aspects of the Classification of Forensic Economic Examination. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science and Criminalistics, 29(4), 170-187. https://doi.org/10.32353/khrife.4.2022.10