Forensic psychological analysis in cases of invalidating a transaction concluded by a legal person


Keywords: examinee, will, case of invalidating transaction, psychological research, forensic psychological analysis.

Abstract

Theoretical, methodological and practical aspects in cases of invalidating a transaction concluded by a legal person are outlined.

Peculiarities of forensic psychological analysis in cases of invalidating a transaction concluded by a legal entity are studied. Referring to forensic expert practice, the object, subject, tasks of this subject type of forensic psychological analysis are determined. Issues which are solved by forensic psychologicalanalysis in cases on invaliding transaction are indicated. Boundaries of a forensic psychologist competence are outlined. Recommendations are provided as to the reference list of source data required for conducting forensic psychological analysis. Based on forensic expert practice, an algorithm for analyzing source data when conducting a forensic psychological analysis in cases of invalidating a transaction concluded by a legal entity is outlined. The main components that should be identified when conducting a forensic examination of this subject type of forensic psychological analysis are indicated. The experience of scientists and practitioners demonstrates that a problem of will is inseparable from problems of personality, consciousness, self-awareness, motives, needs, emotions, cognitive activity of a person. Considering that intellectual, volitional and emotional processes, states and personality traits act in interconnection, this type of research (as one of the complex subject types of forensic psychological analysis) requires further theoretical analysis of the objective and subjective factors of a person wrong actions (entity of civil law relations) in legally significant circumstances to solve methodological and practical tasks of expertology.

References

Ach, N. (1935). Analyse des Willens ; E. Abderhalder (ed.). Handbuch der biologischen Arbeitsmethoden. Berlin. Teil E. Abt. VI.
Alikina, N. V. (2013). Analiz pomylkovykh dii osobystosti u sudovo-psykholohichnii ek-spertyzi (konsultatyvnyi pryklad). Kryminalistyka i sudova ekspertyza : mizhvi-dom. nauk.-metod. zb. Kyiv. Vyp. 58 (1) [in Ukrainian].
Bekhterev, V. M. (1907—1910). Obieektivnaia psikhologiia : v 3 t. Sankt-Peterburg [in Russian].
Bekhterev, V. M. (1991). Obieektivnaia psikhologiia. Moskva [in Russian].
Belov, V. A., Belevich, A. V., Vitrianskii, V. V., Diuzheva, O. A., Em, V. S., Zenin, I. A., Kozlova, N. V., Kopylov, A. V. i dr. (2002). Praktikum po grazhdanskomu pravu : ucheb. posob. Ch. 2 ; otv. red. S. M. Korneev. Moskva [in Russian].
Bozhovich, L. I., Slavina, L. S., Endovitskaia, T. V. (1976). Opyt ehksperimentalnogo izucheniia proizvolnogo povedeniia. Voprosy psikhologii. № 4 [in Russian].
Braginskii, M. I., Vitrianskii, V. V. (2000). Dogovornoe pravo. Kn. 2 : Dogovory o pere-dache imushchestva. Moskva [in Russian].
Dostoevskii, F. M. (1990). Sobranie sochinenii : v 15 t. ; redkol. : M. G. Fridlender i dr. Leningrad [in Russian].
Ehrdelevskii, A. M. (2002). Zabluzhdenie otnositelno prirody sdelki. Zakon. № 1 [in Russian].
Engalychev, V. F., Shipshin, S. S. (2013). Praktikum po sudebno-psikhologicheskoi ehk-spertize : ucheb.-metod. posob. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. Kaluga [in Russian].
Fasmer, M. (1986). Ehtimologicheskii slovar russkogo iazyka : v 4 t. : per. s nem. 2-e izd., stereotip. Moskva. T. 1 [in Russian].
Gutnikov, O. V. (2003). Nedeistvitelnye sdelki v grazhdanskom prave. Teoriia i praktika osparivaniia. Moskva [in Russian].
Iaroshevskii, G. M. (1996). Istoriia psikhologii ot antichnosti do serediny XIX v. : ucheb. posob. Moskva [in Russian].
Ilin, E. P. (2009). Psikhologiia voli. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. Sankt-Peterburg [in Russian].
Ivannikov, V. A. (1985). K sushchnosti volevogo povedeniia. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. T. 6. № 3. S. 47—55 [in Russian].
Kalin, V. K. (1989). Volevaia reguliatsiia deiatelnosti : avtoref. dis. ... d-ra psikholog. nauk. Tbilisi [in Russian].
Kazmirenko, L. I., Kudermina, O. I., Moisieieva, O. Ye. (2015). Psykholohiia : pidruchnyk ; za zah. red. L. I. Kazmirenko. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Kharitonova, N. K., Safuanov, F. S., Malkin, D. A. (2005). Ehkspertnaia otsenka sdelkos-posobnosti po grazhdanskim delam v ramkakh kompleksnoi sudebnoi psikholo-go-psikhiatricheskoi ehkspertizy : posob. dlia vrachei. Moskva [in Russian].
Kobera, A. V. (2008). Sudovo-psykholohichna ekspertyza yak forma vykorystannia psykholohichnykh znan v yurysprudentsii. Naukovi zapysky Natsionalnoho uni-versytetu «Ostrozka akademiia». Seriia : Psykholohiia. Vyp. 11. URL: https:// nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Nznuoapp_2008_11_13 (data zvernennia: 19.03.2021) [in Ukrainian].
Koroleva, E. V. (2010). Sudebno-psikhiatricheskaia otsenka psikhicheskikh rasstroistv u lits, sovershivshikh sdelki : avtoref. dis. … d-ra med. nauk. Moskva [in Russian].
Kratkii psikhologicheskii slovar (1985) ; sost. : L. A. Karpenko ; pod obshch. red. A. V. Petrovskogo, M. G. Iaroshevskogo. Moskva [in Russian].
Losskii, N. O. (1991). Osnovnye ucheniia psikhologii s tochki zreniia voliuntarizma. Vo-prosy filosofii i psikhologii. Moskva. Kn. 64 (IV). S. 779—823 ; Kn. 65 (V) [in Russian].
Malkin, D. A. (2004). Ehkspertnaia otsenka psikhicheskogo sostoianiia lits, sovershiv-shikh sdelki (v ramkakh kompleksnoi sudebnoi psikhologo-psikhiatricheskoi ehk-spertizy) : avtoref. dis. … kand. med. nauk. Moskva [in Russian].
Matveev, I. V. (2002). Pravovaia priroda nedeistvitelnykh sdelok. Moskva [in Russian].
Mokhonko, A. R., Mugantseva, L. A. (2013). Sudebno-psikhiatricheskaia ehkspertiza v grazhdanskom protsesse : tez. nauch.-prakt. konf. Sankt-Peterburg [in Russian].
Naukovo-metodychni rekomendatsii z pytan pidhotovky ta pryznachennia sudovykh ekspertyz ta ekspertnykh doslidzhen : zatv. nakazom Min’iustu Ukrainy vid 08.10.1998 r. № 53/5 (zi zmin. ta dopov.). URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/ show/z0705-98 (data zvernennia: 19.03.2021) [in Ukrainian].
Novaia filosofskaia ehntsiklopediia (2000) : v 4 t. ; nauch.-red. sovet : V. S. Stepin, A. A. Guseinov, G. IU. Semigin, A. P. Ogurtsov. Moskva. URL: https://iphlib. ru/library/collection/newphilenc/document/HASH2828150c93bb42edd37028# (data zvernennia: 13.03.2021) [in Russian].
Novitskii, I. B. (1954). Sdelki. Iskovaia davnost. Moskva [in Russian].
Obzor praktiki primeneniia zakonodatelstva o zakliuchenii, izmenenii, rastorzhenii dogovorov : utv. Prezidiumom Federalnogo arbitrazhnogo suda Uralskogo okru-ga ot 21.06.2002 g. protokol № 3. URL: https://fasuo.arbitr.ru/node/1420 (data zvernennia: 13.03.2021) [in Russian].
Ortega-i-Gasset, KH. (1997). Izbrannye trudy ; sost., red. A. M. Rutkevich. Moskva [in Russian].
Pashkovska, T. (2017). Vyznannia uhod nediisnymy: psykholoh rozberetsia? // Ofitsiinyi sait «Iurydychnoi hazety». 24.02.2017. URL: https://yur-gazeta.com/pub-lications/events/viznannya-ugod-nediysnimi-psiholog-rozberetsya.html (data zvernennia: 19.03.2021) [in Ukrainian].
Polianskaia, V. A. (2006). Kompetentsiia psikhologa v kompleksnoi sudebnoi psikholo-go-psikhiatricheskoi ehkspertize sdelkosposobnosti. Sibirskii iuridicheskii vest-nik. № 4 (35) [in Russian].
Poriadok vedennia Reеstru metodik provedennia sudovikh ekspertiz : zatv. nakazom MіN’iustu Ukraini vіd 02.10.2008 r. № 1666/5 (zі zmіn. ta dopov.). URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0924-08 (data zvernennia: 13.03.2021) [in Ukrainian].
Rabinovich, N. V. Nedeistvitelnost sdelok i ee posledstviia. Leningrad, 1960. [in Russian]171 s.
Reiestr metodyk provedennia sudovykh ekspertyz // Ofitsiinyi sait Ministerstva yustytsii Ukrainy. URL: https://rmpse.minjust.gov.ua (data zvernennia: 13.03.2021) [in Ukrainian].
Romanov, V. V. (2019). Iuridicheskaia psikhologiia : ucheb. posob. dlia SPO. 3-e izd., pererab. i dop. Moskva [Ehlektronnyi resurs]. URL: https://urait.ru/bcode/433474 (data zvernennia: 13.03.2021) [in Russian].
Rubinshtein, S. L. (2002). Osnovy obshchei psikhologii. Sankt-Peterburg. 2-e izd. [in Russian].
Sadikov, O. N. (2000). Nedeistvitelnye i nesostoiavshiesia sdelki. Iuridicheskii mir. № 6. S. 8 [in Russian].
Safuanov, F. S., Perepravina, IU. O., Chernenkov, A. D. (2018). Neiropsikhologicheskoe issledovanie pri sudebno-psikhologicheskoi ehkspertnoi otsenke sdelkosposob-nosti. Psikhologiia i pravo. T. 8. № 4. DOI: 10.17759/psylaw.2018080411 (data zvernennia: 13.03.2021) [in Russian].
Sakhnova, T. V. (1997). Osnovy sudebno-psikhologicheskoi ehkspertizy po grazhdanskim delam : ucheb. posob. Moskva [in Russian].
Sechenov, I. M. (1953). Izbrannye proizvedeniia. Moskva [in Russian].
Sekerazh, T. N. (2004). Teoreticheskie i metodicheskie osnovy diagnostiki «poroka volI» v sudebnoi psikhologicheskoi ehkspertize : dis. … kand. iurid. nauk. Moskva [in Russian].
Selivanov, V. I. (1982). Volevaia reguliatsiia aktivnosti lichnosti. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. T. 3. № 4. S. 14—25 [in Russian].
Shestakova, N. D. (2008). Nedeistvitelnost sdelok. 2-e izd., ispr. i dop. Sankt-Peterburg [in Russian].
Smirnov, B. N. (2004). O raznykh podkhodakh k probleme voli v psikhologii. Voprosy psikhologii. № 3 [in Russian].
Tsyvilnyi kodeks Ukrainy : Zakon Ukrainy vid 16.01.2003 r. № 435-IV (zi zmin. ta dopov.). URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/435-15 (data zvernennia: 13.03.2021) [in Ukrainian].
Uznadze, D. N. (2001). Psikhologiia ustanovki. Sankt-Peterburg [in Russian].
Velyka Ukrainska entsyklopediia. Tematychnyi reiestr hasel z napriamu «Iurydychni nauky» (2017) ; ukladachi : V. L. Babka, M. M. Shumylo ; za red. d. i. n., prof. A. M. Kyrydon. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Vygotskii, L. S. (1982). Myshlenie i rech : sobr. soch. v 6 t. Moskva [in Russian].
Yehorova, T. M., Alikina, N. V., Savkina, T. V. (2017). Dyferentsialnyi pidkhid do provedennia sudovoi psykholohichnoi ekspertyzy yak pidstava vyznachennia yii predmetnykh vydiv. Arotskerovski chytannia : zb. mat-liv Mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konf., prysviach. 90-rich. vid dnia narodzh. vydat. vchenoho-kryminalis-ta, d-ra yuryd. nauk, prof. L. Yu. Arotskera (Poltava, 25.05.2017). Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
Yehorova, T. M., Yehorov, V. V. (2019). Dyskusiini pytannia shchodo ob’iekta ta predmeta sudovoi psykholohichnoi ekspertyzy. Aktualni pytannia sudovoi ekspertyzy i kry-minalistyky : zb. mat-liv Mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konf., prysviach. 150-rich. z dnia narodzh. zasluzh. prof. M. S. Bokariusa (Kharkiv, 18—19.04.2019). Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].

Abstract views: 19
PDF Downloads: 20 PDF Downloads: 5
Published
2021-07-27
How to Cite
KharinaТ., & HerasimenkoО. (2021). Forensic psychological analysis in cases of invalidating a transaction concluded by a legal person. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science and Criminalistics, 23(1), 372-387. https://doi.org/10.32353/khrife.1.2021.29