PECULIARITIES OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY FORENSIC STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND ECONOMIC EXAMINATIONS APPOINTMENT

R. Rudzevych

doi:10.32353/khrife.2.2020.32

R. Rudzevych

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32353/khrife.2.2020.32

Keywords: multidisciplinary examination, forensic structural engineering, economic examination, special knowledge, objects of research, questions addressed to forensic expert.

Abstract

A growing number of crimes in the field of construction necessitates the development of a certain course of actions aimed to ensure their speedy disclosure.

Forensic expert practice shows that the most common violation while conducting construction work involving budget funds is overvaluation of cost of carried out construction work.

Investigation of complex mechanisms of committing crimes in the construction field is impossible without the use of special construction and technical knowledge, and illegal transfer of budget funds cannot be established without special economic knowledge.

Attention should be drawn to multidisciplinary forensic structural engineering and economic examination, as an effective procedural instrument for seeking truth while investigating economic crimes in this area.

The article considers peculiarities of forensic economic examination appointment during investigation of crimes in the construction field. The existing problems and shortcomings that arise in practice when assigning multidisciplinary forensic structural engineering and economic examination are outlined. An example of the most common task that arises while investigation of economic crimes in the field of construction and progress of its implementation are provided.

References

Bashkirov, G. B., Zavdoveva, I. G., Baranov, P. Iu. (2014). Osobennosti naznacheniia i provedeniia sudebnykh kompleksnikh stroitelno-ekonomicheskikh ekspertiz po opredeleniiu stoimosti stroitelno-montazhnykh rabot. Teoriia ta praktyka sudovoi ekspertyzy i kryminalistyky. Vyp. 14. URL: https://www.hniise.gov.ua/user_files/ File/sbornik/2014/PDF/59.pdf (data zvernennia: 25.06.2020) [in Russian].
DSTU B D.1.1-1:2013. Pravyla vyznachennia vartosti budivnytstva. Chynnyi vid 01.01.2014 r. URL: https://www.minregion.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/ DSTU1.1-1_z_-Zm_noyu-1.pdf (data zvernennia: 25.06.2020) [in Ukrainian].
Kryminalnyi protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy: Zakon Ukrainy vid 13.04.2012 r. № 4651-VI (zi zmin. ta dopov.). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy (VVR). 2013. № 9–10, 11–12, 13. St. 88. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4651-17 (data zvernennia: 25.06.2020) [in Ukrainian].
Lysenko, A. M. (2008). Ekonomichni doslidzhennia operatsii, poviazanykh z vykonanniam budivelnykh robit iz zaluchenniam biudzhetnykh koshtiv. Teoriia ta praktyka sudovoi ekspertyzy i kryminalistyky. Vyp. 8. URL: http://www.hniise.gov.ua/ user_files/File/files/2008.pdf (data zvernennia: 25.06.2020) [in Ukrainian].
Polozhennia pro dokumentalne zabezpechennia zapysiv u bukhhalterskomu obliku: zatv. nakazom Minfinu Ukrainy vid 24.05.1995 r. № 88 (zi zmin. ta dopov.). URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0168-95 (data zvernennia: 25.06.2020) [in Ukrainian].
Polozhennia pro orhanizatsiiu bukhhalterskoho obliku, bukhhalterskoho kontroliu pid chas zdiisnennia operatsiinoi diialnosti v bankakh Ukrainy: zatv. postanovoiu Pravlinnia NBU vid 04.07.2018 r. № 75. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/ show/v0075500-18#n12 (data zvernennia: 25.06.2020) [in Ukrainian].
Poriadok kaznacheiskoho obsluhovuvannia mistsevykh biudzhetiv: zatv. nakazom Minfinu Ukrainy vid 23.08.2012 r. № 938 (zi zmin. ta dopov.). URL: https://zakon. rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z1569-12 (data zvernennia: 25.06.2020) [in Ukrainian].
Pro bukhhalterskyi oblik ta finansovu zvitnist v Ukraini: Zakon Ukrainy vid 16.07.1999 r. № 996-XIV (zi zmin. ta dopov.). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy (VVR). 1999. № 40. St. 365. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/996-14/ ed20200402 (data zvernennia: 25.06.2020) [in Ukrainian].
Pro zatverdzhennia Instruktsii pro pryznachennia ta provedennia sudovykh ekspertyz ta ekspertnykh doslidzhen ta Naukovo-metodychnykh rekomendatsii z pytan pidhotovky ta pryznachennia sudovykh ekspertyz ta ekspertnykh doslidzhen: nakaz Miniustu Ukrainy vid 08.10.1998 r. № 53/5 (zi zmin. ta dopov.). URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0705-98 (data zvernennia: 25.06.2020) [in Ukrainian].
Simakova-Yefremian, E. B. (2017). Teoretyko-pravovi ta metodolohichni zasady kompleksnykh sudovo-ekspertnykh doslidzhen: dys. d-ra yuryd. nauk. Kharkiv. URL: http://nauka.nlu.edu.ua/download/diss/Simakova/d_Simakova.pdf (data zvernennia: 25.06.2020) [in Ukrainian].
Zapototskyi, A. (2017). Osoblyvosti pryznachennia sudovykh ekspertyz pid chas ustanovlennia obstavyn, yaki maiut znachennia v protsesi rozsliduvannia zlochyniv u sferi budivnytstva. Pidpryiemnytstvo, hospodarstvo i pravo. Vyp. 6. URL: http://pgp-journal.kiev.ua/archive/2017/6/40.pdf (data zvernennia: 25.06.2020) [in Ukrainian].
Zholobetska, M. B., Koloniuk, V. P. (2019). Kompleksna sudova budivelno-tekhnichna ta ekonomichna ekspertyza. Kryminalistyka i sudova ekspertyza. Vyp. 64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33994/kndise.2019.64.61 (data zvernennia: 25.06.2020) [in Ukrainian].