TOPICAL ISSUES OF THE CONCEPT OF FORENSIC EXPERT PROFESSIONAL ETHICS FORMATION


Keywords: експертна ініціатива, судовий експерт, анкетування, висновок судового експерта, експертне дослідження

Abstract

The article provides interpretation for the concepts of “ethics”, “professional ethics”, “forensic expert professional ethics”, as well as their main components are distinguished. The main stages of formation of ethics as a branch of knowledge are outlined, concise information on scientists who became founders of ethics as a science and made a significant contribution to the process of its origin, formation and development, is provided. Complex issues of ethics principles application in professional activity, formation of forensic expert professional ethics are provided. Scientists who outlined main parameters of a forensic expert personality, his moral qualities, are listed. The list of criteria required for forensic expert successful professional activities is presented. The necessity of creating a unified Code of Professional Ethics for a forensic expert was substantiated since the professional ethics of a forensic expert, according to the author, has many components: this is, on the one hand, the official ethics (ethical requirements contained in legal norms, in particular, in the provisions of the Law of Ukraine: “On Judicial Examination”), corporate ethics (business ethics)(in collective agreements, internal regulations are outlined, basic moral qualities that a person who holds the position of forensic expert should possess are presented) and traditional ethics, which basic principles are introduced on the basis of scientific achievements of theoreticians.

As for creation of a unified, standardized Code of Professional Ethics for a forensic expert, the problem remains unresolved for both scientists and legislators as it requires their cohesive and fruitful cooperation, since such code needs to be thoroughly developed by scientists in the field of ethics, forensic experts and lawyers. The issue as to creation of the Code is relevant since the profession of forensic expert in connection with increasing openness of court proceedings becomes public, and therefore needs to be regulated by rules of conduct for a forensict expert while his official duties fulfillment.

References

Anikin, D. A. Etika: konsp. lektc. (1. Etika I. Kanta). VikiChtenie. URL: https://culture. wikireading.ru/61350 (data zvernennia: 09.03.2020) [in Russian].
Arotcker, L. E. (1968). Ob etike sudebnogo eksperta. Kriminalistika i sudebnaia ekspertiza: Respubl. mezhvedom. sb. nauch. i nauch.-metod. rabot. Vyp. 5. Kyiv [in Russian].
Bugera, V. E. (2010). Sotcialnaia sushchnost i rol filosofii Nitcshe. Moscow [in Russian].
Gurevich, P. S. (2019). Etika: uchebnik dlia bakalavrov: 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. Moscow [in Russian].
Klimenko, N. I., Tcipeniuk, S. A. (2010). Eticheskie osnovy ekspertnoi deiatelnosti. Ekspert-kriminalist. № 2. URL: https://center-bereg.ru/f982.html. [in Russian].
Klymenko, N. I. (2007). Sudova ekspertolohiia: kurs lektsii: navch. posib. dlia stud. yuryd. spets. vyshch. navch. zakl. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Kryminalnyi protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy: Zakon Ukrainy vid 13.04.2012 r. № 4651- VI (zi zmin. ta dopov.). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy (VVR). 2013. № 9–10, 11–12, 13. St.88. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4651-17 (data zvernennia: 09.03.2020) [in Ukrainian].
Paulsen, F. Vvedenie v filosofiiu. RIDLI. URL: https://readli.net/chitat-online/?b=987573&pg=1 (data zvernennia: 09.03.2020) [in Russian].
Pro sudovu ekspertyzu: Zakon Ukrainy vid 25.02.1994 r. № 4038-XII (zi zmin. ta dopov.). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy (VVR). 1994. № 28. St.232 [in Ukrainian].
Shepitko, V. Iu. (2007). Problemy formirovaniia vnutrennego ubezhdeniia sudebnogo eksperta. Materialy mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentcii «Teoriia i praktika sudebnoi ekspertizy v sovremennykh usloviiakh» (Moscow, 14– 15.02.2007). Moscow [in Russian].
Shliakhov, A. R. (1969). Protcessualnye prava i obiazannosti rukovoditelia ekspertnogo uchrezhdeniia. Kriminalistika i sudebnaia ekspertiza: Respubl. mezhvedom. sb. nauch. i nauch.-metod. rabot. Vyp. 6. Kyiv [in Russian].
Sokrat. Platon. Arystotel. Seneka. Biohrafichna biblioteka F. Pavlenkova «ZhZL: Zhyttia Chudovykh Liudei». URL: http://bibliograph.com.ua/zhzl (data zvernennia: 09.03.2020) [in Ukrainian].
Sudovyi ekspert: psykholohichni aspekty praktychnoi diialnosti (2011) metod. posib. Eds.: S. O. Shevtsov, S. M. Lozova. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Tsyvilnyi protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy: Zakon Ukrainy vid 18.03.2004 r. № 1618-IV (zi zmin. ta dopov.). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy (VVR). 2004. № 40–41, 42. St. 492. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1618-15 (data zvernennia: 29.05.2020) [in Ukrainian].

Abstract views: 308
PDF Downloads: 637
Published
2020-06-01
How to Cite
NedoseсаO. (2020). TOPICAL ISSUES OF THE CONCEPT OF FORENSIC EXPERT PROFESSIONAL ETHICS FORMATION. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science and Criminalistics, 22(2), 193-200. https://doi.org/10.32353/khrife.2.2020.14
Section
GENERAL REGULATIONS OF FORENSIC EXAMINATION