REGARDING RELATION BETWEEN CLASSIFICATION OF FORENSIC SCIENCE GENERAL THEORY TASKS AND PRACTICAL FORENSIC ACTIVITY (Review Article)


Keywords: forensic science, forensic examination, identification task, diagnostic problem, situational task, classification, forensic science institutes.

Abstract

The article analyzes conceptual foundations, views and ideas as to understanding of the essence of the classification of forensic science general theory tasks. The main views of scientists concerning classification of forensic examination typical tasks are analyzed. Information is established by examining properties of individual objects or characteristics of several objects interaction process. Special (individual) tasks of the forensic science general theory include: research on the development and formation of forensic examination types, expansion of the scope of their practical application; design of the latest types and kids of forensic examinations in connection with the emergence of modern facilities or improvement of methods and techniques existing in forensic practice; modernization of software for an expert workstation; improvement of the practical activities of forensic experts and emergence of scientific research innovative tasks in the field of forensic science; planned enhancement of existing scientific knowledge and improvement of general and individual theories of forensic science; development (taking into account current realities) of methods and techniques for assessing an expert conclusion.

Having analyzed the trends in the development of individual theories of forensic science and forensic practice, we suggest to supplement the outlined special tasks of forensic science theory with the following: development of systemic links between state and non-state entities of forensic activity; development and rationalization of organizational foundations of forensic activity, including the development of an individual rating of a particular forensic expert and of a forensic science institute in general.

It has been proved that a scientifically grounded classification of forensic science general theory tasks and general tasks of practical forensic activity increases efficiency of forensic activity implementation, helps to identify and investigate crimes, to establish circumstances to be proved in a particular case in the manner stipulated by a corresponding procedural legislation of Ukraine.

References

Alieksieiev, O. O., Areshonkov, V. V., Atamanchuk, V. M. ta in. Kryminalistyka: multymed. pidruch. Kafedra kryminalistyky ta sudovoi medytsyny NAVS. URL: https:// arm.naiau.kiev.ua/books/kruminalist/lections/lection_1.3.html (data zvernennia: 22.10.2020) [in Ukrainian].
Averianova, T. V. (2009). Sudebnaia ekspertiza. Kurs obshchei teorii. Moscow [in Russian].
Hora, I. V. (2014). Kompleksna sudova ekspertyza v aspekti doslidzhennia mizhhaluzevoho instytutu sudovykh ekspertyz v sudochynstvi Ukrainy. Visnyk Akademii advokatury Ukrainy. T. 11. № 3 (31) [in Ukrainian].
Informatsiino-metodychnyi lyst z pravyl povodzhennia z obiektamy-nosiiamy, na yakykh mozhut buty zalysheni yak slidy ruk, tak i slidy biolohichnoho pokhodzhennia osib, prychetnykh do uchynennia zlochynu pry ohliadi mistsia podii ta v laboratornykh umovakh. (2012). DNDEKTs MVS Ukrainy. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Kliuiev, O. M. (2018). Mizhnarodni standarty ta mizhnarodne spivrobitnytstvo u sferi sudovo-ekspertnoi diialnosti v Ukraini. Aktualni pytannia sudovoi ekspertyzy ta kryminalistyky: mat-ly Mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konf., prysviach. 95-rich. stvor. KhNDISE im. Zasl. prof. M. S. Bokariusa (Kharkiv, 10—11.10.2018). Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
Kliuiev, O. M. (2019). Udoskonalennia ekspertnoho zabezpechennia pravosuddia: teoretychni, pravovi ta orhanizatsiini aspekty. Teoriia ta praktyka sudovoi ekspertyzy i kryminalistyky: zb. nauk. pr. Kharkiv. Vyp. 19. URL: https://doi.org/10.32353/ khrife.1.2019.08 (data zvernennia: 01.12.2020) [in Ukrainian].
Klymenko, N. I. (2007). Sudova ekspertolohiia: kurs lektsii: navch. posib. dlia stud. yuryd. spets. vyshch. navch. zakl. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Klymenko, N. I. (2013). Zahalna teoriia sudovoi ekspertolohii: poniattia i mistse v systemi naukovoho znannia. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Irpinskoi finansovoiurydychnoi akademii (ekonomika, pravo). Vyp. 2 [in Ukrainian].
Koldin, A. V., Krestovnikov, O. A. (2007). Istochniki kriminalisticheskoi informatcii. Ed.: V. Ia. Koldina. Moscow [in Russian].
Kundilovska, T. A., Khomutenko, V. P., Khomutenko, A. V. (2018). Teoriia ta praktyka provedennia sudovykh ekspertyz za napriamkom inzhenernykh, ekonomichnykh, tovaroznavchykh vydiv doslidzhen ta otsinochnoi diialnosti: monohrafiia. Eds.: V. P. Khomutenko, O. Yu. Kostina. Odesa [in Ukrainian].
Mailis, N. P. (2007). Rukovodstvo po trasologicheskoi ekspertize: ucheb. dlia vuzov. Moscow [in Russian].
Osnovy sudovoi ekspertyzy: navchalnyi posibnyk dlia fakhivtsiv, yaki maiut namir otrymaty abo pidtverdyty kvalifikatsiiu sudovoho eksperta. (2016). Eds.: L. M. Holovchenko, A. I. Lozovyi, E. B. Simakova-Yefremian ta in. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
Pro nevidkladni zakhody z provedennia reform ta zmitsnennia derzhavy: Ukaz Prezydenta Ukrainy vid 08.11.2019 r. № 837/2019. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/ show/837/2019 (data zvernennia: 25.11.2020) [in Ukrainian].
Pro zatverdzhennia Instruktsii pro pryznachennia ta provedennia sudovykh ekspertyz ta ekspertnykh doslidzhen ta Naukovo-metodychnykh rekomendatsii z pytan pidhotovky ta pryznachennia sudovykh ekspertyz ta ekspertnykh doslidzhen: nakaz Miniustu Ukrainy vid 08.10.1998 r. № 53/5 (u red. nakazu Miniustu Ukrainy vid 26.12.2012 r. № 1950/5). URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0001- 13#n6 (data zvernennia: 22.10.2020) [in Ukrainian].
Pyrih, I. V. (2011). Teoretychni osnovy ekspertnoi diialnosti orhaniv vnutrishnikh sprav: monohrafiia. Dnipropetrovsk [in Ukrainian].
Saltevskyi, M. V. (2006). Kryminalistyka (u suchasnomu vykladi): pidruchnyk. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Savchenko, I. O. (2013). Aktualni aspekty zminennia metodyk provedennia sudovykh ekspertyz. Teoriia ta praktyka sudovoi ekspertyzy i kryminalistyky: zb. nauk. pr. Vyp. 13 [in Ukrainian].
Shcherbakovskyi, M. H. (2016). Typovi zavdannia sudovo-ekspertnoho doslidzhennia. Pravo i bezpeka. № 4 (63) [in Ukrainian].
Simakova-Yefremian, E. B. (2020). Shchodo neobkhidnosti reformuvannia bazovoho zakonodavstva Ukrainy pro ekspertne zabezpechennia pravosuddia. Problemy reformuvannia bazovoho zakonodavstva Ukrainy z pytan ekspertnoho zabezpechennia pravosuddia: mat-ly kruhloho stolu (Kharkiv, 06—07.02.2020). Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
Simakova-Yefremian, E. B., Balynian, T. Ye., Derecha, L. M. (2010). Pro kryterii otsiniuvannia metodyk provedennia sudovykh ekspertyz v Ukraini. Teoriia ta praktyka sudovoi ekspertyzy i kryminalistyky. Kharkiv. Vyp. 10 [in Ukrainian].
Vse pro pocherkoznavchu ekspertyzu. Protokol: yurydychnyi internet-resurs. 22.03.2019. URL: https://protocol.ua/ua/vse_pro_pocherkoznavchu_ekspertizu (data zvernennia: 22.10.2020) [in Ukrainian].

Abstract views: 134
PDF Downloads: 451
Published
2020-12-01
How to Cite
Polianskyi, A., & Juodkaite-Granskiene, G. (2020). REGARDING RELATION BETWEEN CLASSIFICATION OF FORENSIC SCIENCE GENERAL THEORY TASKS AND PRACTICAL FORENSIC ACTIVITY (Review Article). Theory and Practice of Forensic Science and Criminalistics, 22(2), 179-192. https://doi.org/10.32353/khrife.2.2020.13
Section
GENERAL REGULATIONS OF FORENSIC EXAMINATION