PREHISTORY OF FORMATION OF FORENSIC INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ANALYSIS IN THE CONTEXT OF FORENSIC ACTIVITY GENESIS IN UKRAINE (FROM THE TIME OF KIEVAN PRINCIPALITY TO THE FIRST WORLD WAR) (Review Article)
Abstract
Preconditions for emergence of forensic intellectual property analysis in Ukraine and abroad in the period from the 10th to the beginning of 20th century in the context of forensic science genesis are comprehensively analyzed in the article. The following sources of court proceedings of the Kyivan Principality (Russia) Epoch and the so-called “Dark ages” (in the 12th/14th centuries), as “Russkaya Pravda”, treaties of appanage princes with grand princes and between each other, charters and letters patent of princes, sudebniky, etc., along with the Statutes of Lithuania (16th century) and others are considered. It is argued that emergence of forensic science in Europe was linked to origin and nature of evidence in court proceedings. Forensic experts are involved when their findings become legitimate evidence for court in criminal and civil proceedings. It is emphasized that for the first time the procedural status of a forensic expert as the “third party expert” is regulated in the Statute of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Empire of 1864 (Articles 112, 690, 691, 692, 698, etc.).
It is noted that the establishment of forensic activities in the field of intellectual property was preceded by legitimization of intellectual property rights in Austria-Hungary, England, Spain, the Netherlands, Germany, Russia, the USA, France in the 18th century, as well as the establishment of administrative and judicial mechanisms for its protection. At the same time, the practice of involving experts in consideration of copyright disputes over scientific, literary and artistic works, inventions, etc., was uncommon in the 19th century.
In 1913, offices of forensic science under the prosecutors of the Kyiv and Odessa Judicial Chambers, which contributed to institutionalization of forensic activities and professionalism of forensic experts were established. These circumstances created conditions for initiation of forensic intellectual properrty analysis. However, the First World War pushed the litigation over the right to intellectual property to the background.
References
Betell, T. (2018). Sobstvennost i protcvetanie: uroki istorii. Per. s angl. B. Pinskera. Moscow; Cheliabinsk [in Russian].
Bogatyr V. Sudebnaia ekspertiza: vchera i segodnia. Sudebno-iuridicheskaia gazeta. 22.02.2010. URL: https://sud.ua/ru/news/publication/35721-sydebnaya-ekspertiza-vchera-i-segodnya (data zvernennia: 01.08.2020) [in Russian].
Chebyshev-Dmitriev, A. P. (1875). Russkoe ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo po sudebnym ustavam 20 noiabria 1864 g. Sankt-Peterburg, IX s. [in Russian].
Engelman, I. E. (1912). Kurs russkogo grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva: uchebnik. 3-izd., ispr. i dop. Iurev [in Russian].
Fedorenko, V. L. (2017). Stanovlennia ta rozvytok Naukovo-doslidnoho tsentru sudovoi ekspertyzy z pytan intelektualnoi vlasnosti Ministerstva yustytsii Ukrainy (2004–2017 rr.). Problemy teorii ta praktyky sudovoi ekspertyzy z pytan intelektualnoi vlasnosti: mater. nauk.-prakt. konf. (Kyiv, 21.12.2017). Ed.: prof. V. L. Fedorenkao. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Fedorenko, V. L. (2019). Stanovlennia ta rozvytok sudovoi ekspertyzy obiektiv intelektualnoi vlasnosti v Ukraini. Aktualni pytannia sudovoi ekspertolohii, kryminalistyky ta kryminalnoho protsesu: mat. Mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konf. (Kyiv, 05.11.2019). Eds.: O. H. Ruvin, V. V. Nestor; uklad. O. I. Zherebko, A. O. Poltavskyi, O. V. Yudina. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Fedorenko, V. L., Kovalenko, V. V. (2020). Sudova ekspertyza obiektiv prava intelektualnoi vlasnosti yak vazhlyva funktsiia Ukrainskoi derzhavy: henezys i perspektyvy rozvytku. Ekspert: paradyhmy yurydychnykh nauk i derzhavnoho upravlinnia [in Ukrainian].
Fedorenko, V. L., Timoshchik, L. P., Sobin, A. K. (2019). Sudebnaia ekspertiza obektov prava intellektualnoi sobstvennosti v Ukraine: poniatie, vidy i sistema. Armianskii zhurnal sudebnoi ekspertizy i kriminalistiki. № 1 [in Russian].
Fedorenko, V. L., Tymoshchyk, L. P. (2019). Sudova ekspertyza z pytan intelektualnoi vlasnosti: henezys, poniattia, klasyfikatsiia ta systema. Ekspert: paradyhmy yurydychnykh nauk ta derzhavnoho upravlinnia. № 1 (3) [in Ukrainian].
Foinitckii, I. Ia. (1899). Kurs ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. Tom II. 2-e izd., pererab. Sankt-Peterburg [in Russian].
Golmsten, A. Kh. (1894). Uchebnik russkogo grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva. 2-e izd., ispr. i dop. Sankt-Peterburg [in Russian].
Kaminskyi, A. M. (2020). Teoriia sudovoi ekspertyzy v Ukraini. Teoriia ta praktyka sudovoi ekspertyzy i kryminalistyky: zb. materialiv III Vseukr. nauk.-prakt. konf. (Kyiv, 27.02.2020). Kyiv – Mariupol [in Ukrainian].
Kazanskii, P. E. (1897). Vseobshchie administrativnye soiuzy gosudarstv: monografiia. T. 3. Odessa [in Russian].
Khrestomatiia pamiatnikov feodalnogo gosudarstva i prava stran Evropy. (1961). Gosudarstvo drevnikh frankov, Anglo-Saksonskoe gosudarstvo, Angliia, Germaniia, Ispaniia, Italiia, Frantciia, Albaniia, Bolgariia, Vengriia, Polsha, Rumyniia, Chekhiia, Iugosloviia. Ed.: V. M. Koretckii. Moscow [in Russian].
Khrestomatiia po istorii russkogo prava. (1901). Sost. M. F. Vladimirskii-Budanov. Vyp. 2. 4-e izd. Kyiv [in Russian].
Kolb, G. F. (1896–1899). Istoriia chelovecheskoi kultury s ocherkom form gosudarstvennogo pravleniia, politiki, razvitiia svobody i blagosostoianiia narodov. Per. s 3-go pererab. i znach. dop. nem. izd.: A. A. Reingoldt (ed.). Kn. 2. Kyiv – Kharkiv [in Russian].
Linovskii, V. A. (1849). Opyt istoricheskikh razyskanii o sledstvennom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve v Rossii. Odessa [in Russian].
Martens, F. F. (1883). Sovremennoe mezhdunarodnoe pravo tcivilizovannykh narodov: v 2 t. T. 2. Sankt-Peterburg [in Russian].
Novosivskyi, I. M. (1986). Narysy istorii prava Bukovyny i Basarabii. Niu-York, Paryzh, Sidnei, Toronto [in Ukrainian].
Pakhman, S. V. (1851). O sudebnykh dokazatelstvakh po drevnemu russkomu pravu, preimushchestvenno grazhdanskomu, v istoricheskom ikh razvitii: Rassuzhdenie Semena Pakhmana. Moscow [in Russian].
Pilenko, A. A. (1902). Pravo izobretatelia: Privilegii na izobreteniia i ikh zashchita v russkom i mezhdunarodnom prave: Istoriko-dogmaticheskoe issledovanie. Kn. 1: Ocherk istorii privilegii na izobreteniia (v sviazi s evoliutciei doktriny). Kn. 2: Pravo na patent. T. 1. Sankt-Peterburg [in Russian].
Sluchevskii, V. K. (1910). Uchebnik russkogo ugolovnogo protcessa. Sudoustroistvo-sudoproizvodstvo. 3-e izd., peredel. i dop. Sankt-Peterburg [in Russian].
Sobranie vazhneishikh pamiatnikov po istorii drevnego russkogo prava. (1859). Sost. I. Lazarevskii, Iak. Utin. Sankt-Peterburg [in Russian].
Spasovich, V. D. (1865). Prava avtorskie i kontrafaktciia. Sankt-Peterburg [in Russian].
Spasovich, V. D. (1890). O prave sobstvennosti v literature. Sochineniia. T. 3: Stati, dissertatcii, lektcii iuridicheskogo soderzhaniia. Sankt-Peterburg [in Russian].
Stanislavskii, A. G. (1855). Issledovanie nachal imushchestvennykh otnoshenii v drevneishikh pamiatnikakh russkogo zakonodatelstva. Kazan [in Russian].
Statuty Velykoho Kniazivstva Lytovskoho (2008): repryntne vydannia 1854 r. Peredmova I. Bondaruka. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Sudovi ekspertyzy v protsesualnomu pravi Ukrainy (2019): navch. Posib. Ed.: O. H. Ruvin. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Trotcina, K. E. (1851). Istoriia sudebnykh uchrezhdenii v Rossii. Sankt-Peterburg [in Russian].
Uchrezhdenie sudebnykh ustanovlenii. Sudebnye ustavy 20 noiabria 1864 goda. (1864). Moscow [in Russian].
Varadinov, N. V. (1855). Issledovanie ob imushchestvennykh ili veshchestvennykh pravakh po zakonam russkim. Statia I: O prave sobstvennosti. Sankt-Peterburg [in Russian].
Vladimirov, L. E. (1886). Uchenie ob ugolovnykh dokazatelstvakh. Osobennaia chast. Kniga pervaia: Lichnyi sudeiskii osmotr i zakliucheniia ekspertov. Kharkiv [in Russian].
Vladislavlev, I. A. (1857). Obshchie osnovaniia grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva. Sankt-Peterburg [in Russian].
Volter, F. M. (1809). Istoriia tcarstvovaniia Liudovika XIV i Liudovika XV, korolei frantcuzskikh, s prisovokupleniem slovaria vsekh znamenitykh Frantcuzskikh muzhei: ministrov, polkovodtcev, pisatelei i khudozhnikov, proslavivshikh tcarstvovanie sikh gosudarei: v 4 ch. Per. s fr. A. Voeikov. Ch. 4. Moscow [in Russian].
Abstract views: 312 PDF Downloads: 562


