PROBLEMS OF USING THE METHOD OF RECONSTRUCTION WHILE LEGAL ACTIVITY
Abstract
The peculiarities of using the method of reconstruction as a forensic method not only while pre-trial investigation of crimes, but also in the process of carrying out other types of legal activity are considered. The forensic essence of investigative, prosecutorial, advocacy and judicial activity is analyzed. Peculiarities of execution of forensic method of reconstruction while implementation of these types of legal activity are determined.
The conclusion as to inter-branch nature of criminalistics as a science has been drawn. On the example of implementation of the method of reconstruction, it is determined that application of criminalistics provisions is the basis for other types of legal activity.
The importance of the method of reconstruction in investigative activity is substantiated which is due to its retrospective nature. The process of reproduction serves as the basis for the possibility to discover the events of a criminal offense by investigators.
Application of the method of reconstruction while implementation of prosecutorial activity is studied. Its pervasive nature during participation in criminal proceedings which are conditioned by the need for a prosecutor to exercise both procedural guidance and support for public prosecution in court has been established.
The problems of advocacy implementation from forensics perspective are analyzed. The need for constant implementation of the process of reproduction of corresponding processes, phenomena, actions and events while implementation of this type of activity has been established.
Peculiarities of application of the reconstruction method during implementation of judicial activity are considered. The process of reproduction is defined as the basis for administrating justice by considering legal disputes, criminal charges, and issuing court’s judgement.
The impossibility of implementation of investigative, prosecutorial, lawyer and judicial activities without application of the method of reconstruction is highlighted. The definition of the method of reconstruction as a basis for discovering events, phenomena, processes that existed in the past and are important for implementation of these types of legal activities is substantiated.
References
Arzamasov, Iu. G. (2007). Priroda iuridicheskoi deiatelnosti. Leningradskii iuridicheskii zhurnal. № 3 (9) [in Russian].
Bernaz, P. (2016). Sledstvennaia deiatelnost kak obekt kriminalisticheskogo obespecheniia. Legea şi viaţa. № 1/3 (289) [in Russian].
Gustov, G. A. (1993). Problemy metodov nauchnogo poznaniia v organizatcii rassledovaniia prestuplenii. (Abstract of candidates thesis). Moscow [in Russian].
Kolodchyn, V. V., Tumaniants, A. R. (2016). Povnovazhennia prokurora v sudovomu provadzhenni u pershii instantsii: monohrafiia. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
Konstytutsiia Ukrainy: Zakon Ukrainy vid 28.06.1996 r. № 254k/96-VR (zi zmin. ta dopov.). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy. 1996. № 30. St. 141 [in Ukrainian].
Kryminalnyi protsesualnyi kodeks Ukrainy: Zakon Ukrainy vid 13.04.2012 r. № 4651-VI (zi zmin. ta dopov.). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy (VVR). 2013. № 9–10, 11–12, 13. St. 88 [in Ukrainian].
Lakomskaia, M. Iu. (2018). Takticheskie operatcii gruppy «rekonstruktciia» (operatcii planirovaniia i organizatcii otdelnykh sledstvennykh deistvii). Obshchestvo i pravo. № 3 (65) [in Russian].
Lapkin, A. V. (2012). Rol prokurora v zabezpechenni prav i zakonnykh interesiv poterpiloho u kryminalnomu sudochynstvi Ukrainy: monohrafiia. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
Lapkin, A. V. (2018) Prokuror yak menedzher dosudovoho rozsliduvannia. Pravovyi chasopys Donbasu. № 1 (62) [in Ukrainian].
Nykytchenko, N. V. (2017). Uchast prokurora u kryminalnomu provadzhenni na stadii sudovoho rozghliadu. Mizhnarodnyi yurydychnyi visnyk: aktualni problemy suchasnosti (teoriia ta praktyka). Vyp. 4–5 (8–9) [in Ukrainian].
Pro advokaturu ta advokatsku diialnist: Zakon Ukrainy vid 05.07.2012 r. № 5076-VI (zi zmin. ta dopov.). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy (VVR). 2013. № 27. St. 282 [in Ukrainian].
Pro prokuraturu: Zakon Ukrainy vid 14.10.2014 r. № 1697-VII (zi zmin. ta dopov.). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy (VVR). 2015. № 2–3. St. 12 [in Ukrainian].
Pro sudoustrii i status suddiv: Zakon Ukrainy vid 02.06.2016 r. № 1402-VIII (zi zmin. ta dopov.). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy. 2016. № 31. St. 545. S. 7 [in Ukrainian].
Rohatiuk, I. V. (2016). Protsesualna diialnist prokurora na stadii dosudovoho rozsliduvannia: monohrafiia. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Rohatiuk, I. V. (2017). Pidtrymannia prokurorom publichnoho obvynuvachennia v sudi: protsesualna taktyka v nestandartnykh umovakh. Iurydychnyi chasopys Natsionalnoi akademii vnutrishnikh sprav. № 1 (13) [in Ukrainian].
Rozum, I. O. (2017). Sudove rishennia u spravakh administratyvnoi yurysdyktsii: spektralnyi analiz dyskusiinykh teoretychnykh aspektiv sutnosti ta pravovoi pryrody. Iurydychnyi visnyk. № 3 (44) [in Ukrainian].
Samoliuk, Yu. M. (2009). Sudove rishennia u tsyvilnomu protsesi: spirni pytannia. Sudova apeliatsiia. № 1 (14) [in Ukrainian].
Shepitko, V. Yu., Zhuravel, V. A., Konovalova, V. O. ta in. (2019). Kryminalistyka: pidruchnyk: u 2 t. T. 1. V. Yu. Shepitko (ed.). Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
Skybitskyi, B. A. (2016). Povnovazhennia slidchoho suddi u kryminalnomu provadzhenni. Visnyk Lvivskoho torhovelno-ekonomichnoho universytetu. Yurydychni nauky. Vyp. 3. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/nvlkau_2016_3_21 (data zvernennia: 25.11.2020) [in Ukrainian].
Stepanov, V. V., Galushkin, V. I. (2020). Rekonstruktciia – effektivnoe sredstvo issledovaniia obstoiatelstv prestupleniia. Vestnik Saratovskoi gosudarstvennoi iuridicheskoi akademii. № 2 (133) [in Russian].
Talykin, Ye. A. (2008). Hospodarsko-protsesualni zapobizhni zakhody v systemi derzhavnoho rehuliuvannia hospodarskoi diialnosti. Sotsialno-ekonomichni problemy suchasnoho periodu Ukrainy. Vyp. 6. URL: http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/12315 (data zvernennia: 25.11.2020) [in Ukrainian].
Talykin, Ye. A. (2011). Zmist poniattia «pravosuddia» u konteksti funktsii hospodarskoho sudu. Universytetski naukovi zapysky. № 4 (40) [in Ukrainian].
Vilchyk, T. B. (2015). Instytut advokatury Ukrainy: novi pidkhody ta tendentsii rozvytku. Naukovyi visnyk Mizhnarodnoho humanitarnoho universytetu. Seriia: Yurysprudentsiia. Vyp. 16 (1). URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Nvmgu_ jur_2015_16%281%29__8 (data zvernennia: 25.11.2020) [in Ukrainian].
Vilchyk, T. B. (2017). Funktsii instytutsiinoi advokatury. Forum prava. № 2 [in Ukrainian].
Yefimenko, M. Yu. (2012). Zavdannia ta funktsii advokata v administratyvnomu protsesi. Forum prava. № 4 [in Ukrainian].
Abstract views: 331 PDF Downloads: 345
